Motivational interview and scales used to assess the degree of motivation for treatment in drug abuse patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832005000600004Keywords:
Drug dependence, motivation, motivational interview, scalesAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify and review tools used in specialized services to explore aspectos of motivation as a predictive factor of treatment outcome in drug-abusing patients. METHOD: Comprehensive literature review of scales used to assess the degree of motivation. RESULT: Four scales to evaluate stages of behavioural change related to motivation were identified and described, together with their associated psychometric properties - Rhode Island Change Assessment Questionnaire (URICA), Stages of Change Readiness and Treatment Eargness Scale (SOCRATES), Treatment Motivation Questionnaire (TMQ), Readiness to Change Questionnaire (RCQ); The first two have Portuguese validated versions. CONCLUSION: Motivacional theory has been regularly studied in the last decade, allowing the definition of pragmatic evaluation parameters in scales with validity and reliabilities that vary from good to excellent.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2005-12-01
Issue
Section
Reviews of Literature
License
Once accepted for publication, the manuscript becomes permanent property of the Archives of Clinical Psychiatry. This copyright transfer subsumes exclusive and unlimited entitlement of the Archives of Clinical Psychiatry to publish and distribute the full contents of articles in whichever publishing medium, including press and electronic media, in Brazil and abroad.
Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that the Editor and the editorial staff have the right to make revisions aimed at greater conciseness, clarity, and conformity with Journal style, of course without changing its content.
How to Cite
Motivational interview and scales used to assess the degree of motivation for treatment in drug abuse patients . (2005). Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo), 32(6), 330-335. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832005000600004