Sobre Merleau-Ponty, Husserl, Wittgenstein: fenomenologia e dogmatismo

Authors

  • Luiz Henrique Lopes dos Santos Universidade de São Paulo - USP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.2021.188273

Keywords:

Merleau-Ponty, Husserl, Wittgenstein, Phenomenology, Dogmatism

Abstract

Husserl and the young Wittgenstein proposed analogous answers to the critical question concerning the harmony between thought, language and reality. Both answers draw upon the assumption of a non-worldly transcendental subject to which the whole world would be essentially correlated. Merleau-Ponty and the later Wittgenstein criticized this assumption and proposed alternative answers to that question on analogous basis. Both denounced its essentialist presuppositions and both called for notions of worldly and practical transcendental operations. Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenological answer, however, is still not completely free from dogmatic remains.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Husserl, E. (1973). Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. In: Husserliana – Edmund Husserl, Gesammelte Werke, Band I. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.

Husserl, E. (1976). Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie I: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. In: Husserliana – Edmund Husserl, Gesammelte Werke, Band III/1. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1960). “Le philosophe et son ombre”. In: Merleau-Ponty, M., Signes. Paris: Les Éditions Gallimard, p. 201-228.

Husserl, E. (1967). La Structure du comportement. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

Husserl, E. (2020). O Visível e o invisível. 4. ed. Trad. José Artur Gianotti; Ar-mando Mora d'Oliveira. São Paulo: Perspectiva.

Wittgenstein, L. (2017). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Trad. Luiz Henrique Lo-pes dos Santos, 3ª edição. São Paulo: EDUSP.

Published

2021-06-30

Issue

Section

Artigos

How to Cite

Santos, L. H. L. dos. (2021). Sobre Merleau-Ponty, Husserl, Wittgenstein: fenomenologia e dogmatismo. Discurso, 51(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-8863.discurso.2021.188273