Inteligência Artificial e democracia: humanos, máquinas e instituições algorítmicas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-4014.202539113.005Palavras-chave:
Democracia, Inteligência Artificial, Instituições algorítmicas, Governança, LegitimidadeResumo
Este artigo trata das mudanças na dinâmica dos regimes democráticos em razão da emergência da Inteligência Artificial (IA). A teoria democrática avançou na epistemologia da política considerando os avanços de inteligências individuais e coletivas, compreendendo como atores e movimentos sociais tensionam e produzem formas de convivência no seio de democracias. A emergência da Inteligência Artificial significa uma complexificação das dinâmicas democráticas uma vez que ela fundamenta uma epistemologia da política baseada na relação com outras formas de inteligência (individuais e coletivas). A coexistência dessas três formas de inteligência proporciona novos desafios para a teoria democrática no contexto da interação entre humanos e máquinas. Concluímos observando como soluções democráticas têm sido criadas para enfrentar os dilemas sociais que emergem com a Inteligência Artificial.
Downloads
Referências
ABRAHAM, Y. ‘Lavender’: The AI machine directing Israel’s bombing spree in Gaza. In: +972 Magazine, 2024. Available at: https://www.972mag.com/lavender-ai-israeli-army-gaza/
ACEMOGLU, D.; ROBINSON, J.A. Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Currency, 2012.
ACHEN, C. H.; BARTELS, L. M. Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.
ALARIE, B.; NIBLETT, A.; YOON, A.H. How artificial intelligence will affect the practice of law. University of Toronto Law Journal, v.68, n.1, p.106-24, 2018.
ALLEN, D.; WEYL, E. G. The real dangers of generative AI. Journal of Democracy, v.35, n.1, p.147-62, 2024.
AMOORE, L. Machine learning political orders. Review of International Studies, v.49, n.1, p.20-36, 2022.
BACHRACH, P.; BARATZ, M. S. Two faces of power. American Political Science Review, v.56, n.4, p.947-52, 1972.
BENGIO, Y. AI and catastrophic risk. Journal of Democracy, v.34, n.4, p.111-21, 2023.
BENN, C.; LAZAR, S. What’s wrong with automated influence. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, v.52, n.1, p.125-48, 2022.
BENJAMIN, R. Race after technology. New York: Polity Press, 2019.
BOSTROM, N. Racing to the precipice: A model of artificial intelligence development. AI & Society, v.31, n.2, p.201-6, 2016.
BRENNAN, J. Against democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.
BURGESS, P. Algorithmic augmentation of democracy: considering whether technology can enhance the concepts of democracy and the rule of law through four hypotheticals. AI & Society, v.37, n.4, p.97-112, 2022.
CALO, R. Artificial Intelligence policy: A primer and roadmap. University of California Davis Law Review, v.51, n.399, p.399-435, 2017.
CHAMBERS, S. Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, v.6, n.1, p.307-26, 2003.
COECKELBERGH, M. Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence. AI Ethics, v.3, n.1, p..1341-50, 2023.
COHEN, M. et al. Regulating advanced artificial agents. Governance frameworks should address the prospect of AI systems that cannot be safely tested. Science, v.384, n.6691, p.36-38, 2024.
CRAWFORD, K. Atlas of AI: power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2021.
DAHL, R. A. The concept of power. Behavioral Science, v.2, n.3, p.201-15, 1957.
DAHL, R. A. Poliarchy: Participation and opposition. New Heaven: Yale University Press, 1971.
DAHL, R. A. Democracy and its critics. New Heaven: Yale University Press, 1989.
DALTON, R. J.; KLINGEMANN, H. D. Citizens and political behavior. In: DALTON, R. J.; KLINGEMANN, H. D. (Ed.) The Oxford handbook of political behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. p.3-26.
DEWEY, J. The public and its problems. An essay in political inquiry. University Park: Penn State University Press, 2012.
DOWNS, A. The economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1957.
DRYZEK, J. S.; NIEMEYER, S. Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
DUBERRY, J. Artificial intelligence and democracy. Risks and promises of AI-mediated citizen-government relations. Chentelham: Edward-Elgar, 2022.
ESTLUND, D. Democratic authority: A philosophical framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.
FELDSTEIN, S. The road to the digital unfreedom: How artificial intelligence is reshaping repression. Journal of Democracy, v.30, n.1, p.40-52, 2019.
FILGUEIRAS, F. The politics of AI: Democracy and authoritarianism in developing countries. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, v.19, n.4, p.1-16, 2022.
FLORIDI, L. Establishing the rules for building trustworthy AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, v.1, n.1, p.261-2, 2019.
HABERMAS, J. Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.
HELBING, D. et al. Will democracy survive big data and artificial intelligence? Scientific American, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/will-democracy-survive-big-data-and-artificial-intelligence/
HIMMELREICH, J. Against “Democratizing AI”. AI & Society, v.38, p.1333-46, 2023.
HOLZINGER, A. et al. AI for life: Trends in artificial intelligence for biotechnology. New Biotechnology, v.74, n.4, p.16-24, 2023.
INNERARITY, D. The epistemic impossibility of an artificial intelligence take-over of democracy. AI & Society, early view, p.1-5, 2023.
ISSAR, S.; ANEESH, A. What is algorithmic governance? Sociology Compass, v.16, n.1, e12955, 2022.
JANSSEN, M.; HELBIG, P. Innovating and change the policy cicle: Policy-makers be prepared! Government Information Quarterly, v.34, n.4, p.99-105, 2018.
JIMÉNEZ-LUNA, J.; GRISONI, F.; SCNEIDER, G. Drug Discovery with explainable artificial intelligence. Nature Machine Intelligence, v.2, n.1, p.573-84, 2020.
JUNGHERR, A. Artificial intelligence and democracy: A conceptual framework. Social Media + Society, v.9, n.3, p.1-14, 2023.
KÖNIG, P. D. Dissecting the algorithmic Leviathan: On the socio-political anatomy of algorithmic governance, Philosophy & Technology, v.33, n.4, p.467-85, 2019.
KÖNIG, P. D. WENZELBURGER, G. Opportunity for renewal or disruptive force? How artificial intelligence alters democratic politics. Government Information Quarterly, v.37, n.3, 101489, 2020.
KREPS, S.; KRINER, D. How AI threatens democracy. Journal of Democracy, v.34, n.4, p.122-31, 2023.
LANDEMORE, H. Collective wisdom: Old and new. In: LANDEMORE, H.; ELSTER, J. (Ed.) Collective wisdom: Principles and mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012a. p.1-20.
LANDEMORE, H. Democratic reason. Politics, collective intelligence, and the rule of many. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012b.
LASSWELL, H. D.; KAPLAN, A. Power and society: A framework for political inquiry. New York: Routledge, 2017.
LAZAR, S.; PASCAL, A. Can democracy survive artificial general intelligence? In: Tech Policy.Press, 2024. Available at: https://www.techpolicy.press/can-democracy-survive-artificial-general-intelligence/
LÉVY, P. Collective intelligence. Mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace. New York: Basic Books, 1999.
LUKES, S. Power: A radical view. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
MARCH, J. G.; OLSEN, J. P. The uncertainty of the past: Organizational learning under ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research, v.3, n.2, p.147-71, 1975.
MARCH, J. G.; OLSEN, J. P.Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press, 1989.
MARCH, J. G.; OLSEN, J. P. The logic of appropriateness. In: GOODIN, R. E. (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. p.478-97.
MCCARTHY, J. Epistemological problems of artificial intelligence. In: WEBBER, B. L.; NILSSON, N. J. Readings in artificial intelligence. Berlin: Springer, 1981. p.459-65.
MEIJER, A.; LORENZ, L.; WESSELS, M. Algorithmization of bureaucratic organizations: using a practice lens to study how context shapes predictive policing systems. Public Administration Review, v.81, n.5, p.837-46, 2021.
MENDONÇA, R. F. Dimensões democráticas nas jornadas de junho. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, v.33, p.1-23, 2018.
MENDONÇA, R. F.; BERNARDES, C. B. Crise epistêmica e democracia: amadores e especialistas. In: TATAGIBA, L. et al. (Org.) Participação e ativismos: entre retrocessos e resistências. Porto Alegre: Zouk, 2022. p.327-46.
MENDONÇA, R. F.; FILGUEIRAS, F.; ALMEIDA, V. Algorithmic institutionalism: The changing rules of social + political life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.
MINSKY, M. The society of mind. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1986.
MURPHY, J. W.; TAYLOR, R. R. To democratize or not to democratize AI? That is the question. AI and Ethics, early view, p.1-7, 2023.
NEMITZ, P. Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society, n.376, A.37620180089, 2018.
NOBLE, S.U. Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: New York University Press, 2018.
NORTH, D. C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
NOWOTNY, E. In AI we trust: Power, illusion, and control of predictive algorithms. New York: Polity Books, 2021.
OSTROM, E. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential address, American Political Science Review, v.92, n.1, p.1-22, 1999.
OVADYA, A. Reimagining democracy for AI. Journal of Democracy, v.34, n.4, p.162-70, 2023.
PASQUALE, F. The black box society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015.
PIERSON, P.; SKOCPOL, T. Historical institutionalism in contemporary Political Science. In: KATZNELSON, I.; MILNER, H. V. (Ed.) Political Science: State of discipline. New York: Norton, 2002. p.693-721.
RUSSELL, S. Human compatible: Artificial intelligence and the problem of control. New York: Penguim Books, 2019.
SAFAEI, M.; LONGO, J. The end of policy analyst? Testing the capability of artificial intelligence to generate plausible, persuasive and useful policy analysis. Digital Government: Research and Practice, v.5, n.1, p.4-35, 2024.
SALMI, J. A democratic way of controlling artificial general intelligence. AI & Society, v.38, p.1785-91, 2023.
SANTOS, F. Reavaliando a contribuição do “paradoxo” de Condorcet para a moderna análise política. Revista de Sociologia & Política, v.31, e012, 2023.
SCHARRE, P. Army of none: Autonomous weapons and the future of war. New York: W.W. Norton, 2018.
SCHMIDT, V. A. Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth “New Institutionalism”’, European Political Science Review, v.2, n.1, p.1-25, 2010.
SCHUMPETER, J. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Row, 1942.
SIMON, H. A. Reason in human affairs. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1983.
SIMON, H. A. Artificial intelligence: an empirical science. Artificial Intelligence, v.77, n.1, p.95-127, 1995.
TURING, A. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind-A Quarterly Review of Psychology and Philosophy, v.59, n.236, p.433-60, 1950.
WEBER, M. Economy and society. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1978.
WEIZENBAUM, J. Computer power and human reason: From judgment to calculation. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1976.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Fernando Filgueiras, Ricardo Fabrino Mendonça, Virgílio Almeida
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Estudos Avançados não celebra contrato de cessão de direitos autorais com seus colaboradores, razão pela qual não detém os direitos autorais dos artigos publicados. Os interessados em reproduzir artigos publicados na revista devem necessariamente obter o consentimento do autor e atribuir devidamente os créditos ao periódico.
