Os efeitos do Programa Bolsa Família(PBF) no mercado de trabalho: uma análise com Causal Forest

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-53575625rrs

Palavras-chave:

Programa Bolsa Família (PBF), Causal Forest, Heterogeneidade dos efeitos

Resumo

Este estudo investiga o impacto do Programa Bolsa Família (PBF) em três desfechos: a probabilidade de estar empregado, a probabilidade de ter carteira de trabalho assinada e a quantidade de horas trabalhadas. Utilizando o método Causal Forest e dados do segundo trimestre de 2023 da PNAD Contínua, os resultados mostram que beneficiários do PBF têm menor probabilidade de estar empregados, especialmente em empregos formais, e trabalham menos horas semanalmente. Os efeitos variam entre grupos. Mulheres, indivíduos com 30 anos ou mais e residentes urbanos são os mais afetados, com maiores reduções na formalização e nas horas trabalhadas.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Alvim, Augusto Mussi, e Carlos David Godward. 2020. “O Programa Bolsa Família Estimula a Permanência Dos Trabalhadores Brasileiros de Baixa Renda No Mercado Informal”. Redes 25 (dezembro): 2227–50. https://doi.org/10.17058/REDES.V25I0.14011.

Alzúa, María Laura, Guillermo Cruces, e Laura Ripani. 2013. “Welfare Programs and Labor Supply in Developing Countries: Experimental Evidence from Latin America”. Journal of Population Economics 26 (4): 1255–84.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-012-0458-0.

Amarante, Verónica, Marco Manacorda, Andrea Vigorito, e Mariana Zerpa. 2011. Social assistance and labor market outcomes: Evidence from the Uruguayan PANES. https://publications.iadb.org/en/handle/11319/5853.

Araújo, Jevuks Matheus, Gustavo Saraiva Frio, e Pedro Jorge Holanda Alves. 2021. “O efeito do Bolsa Família sobre a distorção idade-série”. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo) 51 (2): 343–71. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-41615125jgp.

Asfaw, Solomon, Benjamin Davis, Josh Dewbre, Sudhanshu Handa, e Paul Winters. 2014. “Cash Transfer Programme, Productive Activities and Labour Supply: Evidence from a Randomised Experiment in Kenya”. The Journal of Development Studies 50 (8): 1172–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2014.919383.

Athey, Susan, e Guido Imbens. 2016. “Recursive partitioning for heterogeneous causal effects”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (27): 7353–60. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510489113.

Athey, Susan, e Stefan Wager. 2019. “Estimating Treatment Effects with Causal Forests: An Application”. Observational Studies 5 (2): 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2019.0001.

Banerjee, Abhijit V., Rema Hanna, Gabriel E. Kreindler, e Benjamin A. Olken. 2017. Debunking the Stereotype of the Lazy Welfare Recipient: Evidence from Cash Transfer Programs. 32 (2): 155–84.

Barbosa, Ana Luiza Neves de Holanda, e Carlos Henrique Leite Corseuil. 2014. “Conditional cash transfer and informality in Brazil”. IZA Journal of Labor & Development 3 (37).

https://izajold.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40175-014-0024-0.

Basu, Sumanta, Karl Kumbier, James B. Brown, e Bin Yu. 2018. “Iterative Random Forests to Discover Predictive and Stable High-Order Interactions”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115 (8): 1943–48.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711236115.

Borjas, George J. 2016. Labor Economics. Seventh edition, International student edition. The McGraw-Hill Series in Economics. McGraw-Hill Education.

Brasil. 1988. “Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988”. Presidência da República Casa Civil.

https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao/Constituicao.htm.

Brauw, Alan de, Daniel O. Gilligan, John Hoddinott, e Shalini Roy. 2015. “Bolsa Família and Household Labor Supply”. Economic development and cultural change 63 (3): 423–57.

Cedeplar, Centro de Desenvolvimento e Planejamento Regional, Secretaria de Avaliação e Gestão da Informação SAGI, e Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome MDS. 2007. Sumário Executivo. Avaliação de impacto do programa bolsa família. UFMG. https://fpabramo.org.br/acervosocial/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2017/08/448.pdf.

Chen, Tzai-Shuen. 2018. “Evaluating Conditional Cash Transfer Policies with Machine Learning Methods”. arXiv:1803.06401. Preprint, arXiv, março 16. http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.06401.

Chernozhukov, Victor, Mert Demirer, Esther Duflo, e Ivan Fernandez-Val. 2018. Generic machine learning inference on heterogeneous treatment effects in randomized experiments, with an application to immunization in India. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w24678.

Covarrubias, Katia, Benjamin Davis, e Paul Winters. 2012. “From Protection to Production: Productive Impacts of the Malawi Social Cash Transfer Scheme”. Journal of Development Effectiveness, março 1. world. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19439342.2011.641995.

Duarte, Gisléia Benini, Breno Sampaio, e Yony Sampaio. 2009. “Programa Bolsa Família: impacto das transferências sobre os gastos com alimentos em famílias rurais”. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural 47 (4):903–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20032009000400005.

Eggers, Andrew C., Guadalupe Tuñón, e Allan Dafoe. 2024. “Placebo Tests for Causal Inference”. American Journal of Political Science 68 (3): 1106–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12818.

Foguel, Miguel Nathan, e Ricardo Paes de Barros. 2010. “The Effects of Conditional Cash Transfer Programmes on Adult Labour Supply: An Empirical Analysis Using a Time-Series-Cross-Section Sample of Brazilian Municipalities”. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo) 40 (2): 259–93. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612010000200001.

Fruttero, Anna, Alexandre Ribeiro Leichsenring, e Luis Henrique Paiva. 2020. “Social Programs and Formal Employment: Evidence from the Brazilian Bolsa Família Program”. IMF Working Papers. IMF Working Papers 2020 (099). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513547701.001.A001.

Gerard, François, Joana Naritomi, e Joana Silva. 2021. “Cash Transfers and Formal Labor Markets: Evidence from Brazil”. SSRN Scholarly Paper N. 3886759. Social Science Research Network, junho 1. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3886759.

Géron, Aurélien. 2022. Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow. O’Reilly Media, Inc.

Hasan, Amer. 2010. “Time allocation in rural households: The indirect effects of conditional cash transfer programs”. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, n. 5256. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1585035.

Hirano, Keisuke, Guido W. Imbens, e Geert Ridder. 2003. “Efficient estimation of Average Treatment Effects using the estimated Propensity Score”. Econometrica 71 (4): 1161–89.

Imbens, Guido W., e Donald B. Rubin. 2015. Causal Inference in Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences. Cambridge University Press.

Jawadekar, Neal, Katrina Kezios, Michelle C. Odden, et al. 2023. “Practical guide to honest Causal Forests for identifying heterogeneous treatment effects”. American Journal of Epidemiology 192 (7): 1155–65.

Kuhn, Max, e Kjell Johnson. 2013. Applied Predictive Modeling. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3.

Marx, Luana. 2023. “How is the Bolsa Família program associated with the test scores performance of economically disadvantaged pupils in Brazil?” International Journal of Educational Development 102 (outubro): 102878.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102878.

Nazareno, Luísa, e Juliana De Castro Galvao. 2023. “The Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Poverty, Inequality, and Employment During COVID-19: A Case Study from Brazil”. Population Research and Policy Review 42 (2): 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-023-09749-3.

Olson, Zachary, Rachel Gardner Clark, e Sarah Anne Reynolds. 2019. “Can a Conditional Cash Transfer Reduce Teen Fertility? The Case of Brazil’s Bolsa Familia”. Journal of Health Economics 63 (janeiro): 128–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.10.006.

Rehill, Patrick, e Nicholas Biddle. 2024. “Heterogeneous treatment effect estimation with high-dimensional data in public policy evaluation -- an application to the conditioning of cash transfers in Morocco using causal machine learning”. arXiv:2401.07075. Preprint, arXiv, março 29. http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.07075.

Ribas, Rafael P., e Fábrio Versas Soares. 2011. “Is the effect of conditional transfers on labor supply negligible everywhere”. Trabalho em evento apresentado em IZA/World Bank Conference: Employment and Development.

https://conference.iza.org/conference_files/worldb2011/ribas_r6802.pdf

Silva, Jeudi Rufino Fernandes da. 2023. “Statistical learning and causal effects: an application to Bolsa Família Program”. Dissertação, UFRGS. https://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/274202.

Soares, Fábio Veras, Rafael Perez Ribas, e Rafael Guerreiro Osario. 2010. “Evaluating the Impact of Brazil´s Bolsa Família”. Latin American Research Rev 45 (2): 173–91.

Vidigal, Vinicius. 2026. “The Impact of Conditional Cash Transfers on Labor Supply: New Evidence from Brazil’s Bolsa Familia”. Journal of Development Effectiveness 18 (1): 86–103.

Wolrd Bank. 2009. “Conditional Cash Transfers: Paying People to Invest in Children”. fevereiro. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2009/02/12/conditional-cash-transfers-paying-people-to-invest-in-children

Zheng, Li, e Weiwen Yin. 2023. “Estimating and Evaluating Treatment Effect Heterogeneity: A Causal Forests Approach”. Research & Politics 10 (1): 20531680231153080. https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680231153080.

Downloads

Publicado

01-06-2026

Edição

Seção

Artigo

Como Citar

Rodrigues da Silva, R. (2026). Os efeitos do Programa Bolsa Família(PBF) no mercado de trabalho: uma análise com Causal Forest. Estudos Econômicos (São Paulo), 56(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-53575625rrs