Revisiting the Geometric Order in Spinoza’s Ethics

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2447-9012.espinosa.2025.231714

Palabras clave:

Geometric order, Spinoza, Ethics, Affect, Geometry

Resumen

In Spinoza’s Ethics, the geometric order functions as a comprehensive methodological framework intended to lead individuals towards a state of freedom and beatitude. Traditionally perceived as a pedagogical tool, Spinoza’s geometric exposition exemplifies a systematic and rigorous approach to presenting the logical ratiocination and argumentation underlying his philosophical thought. By investigating the variegated interplay between geometry and philosophical intent in the Ethics, we examine how Spinoza’s geometric reasoning enables individuals to achieve blessedness and liberation from the passions, independently of revelation and the institutional control of organised religion.The geometrical order that spans the five parts of the Ethics offers a hierarchical sequence of development that reconciles a posteriori and a priori modes of geometric thought and allows the progressive adequation of thought from the empirical to the mental, and also serves as the foundational background for a democratising approach to spiritual self-liberation. We examine the ordine geometrico in the Ethics as expressive of “a demonstrative technique”; how the more geometrico, the geometric method, can articulate “geometry as ontology”; and delve into how his one-substance metaphysics becomes “geometry is ontology”. We move beyond the assertion that Spinoza’s geometrical order is purely Euclidean, and posit polemically that an imagistic intuition for his monadic substance metaphysics can be found in Kepler’s application of perspectival projective geometry to the study of the conics.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

  • Felix Rebolledo Palazuelos, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria

    Doutor, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil.

Referencias

ALDERSEY-WILLIAMS, H. (2020). Dutch Light. Christiaan Huygens and the Making of Science Europe. London: Picador.

BERGGREN, J. L., & THOMAS, R. S. D. (1996). Euclid’s Phaenomena: A Translation and Study of a Hellenistic Treatise in Spherical Astronomy. American Mathematical Society.

CAIRD, J. (1888). Spinoza. Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons.

CURLEY, E. S. (1988). Behind the Geometrical Method: A Reading of Spinoza’s Ethics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

DEBRABANDER, F. (2007). Spinoza and the Stoics: Power, Politics and the Passions. London: Continuum.

De JIJIN, H. (1996). Spinoza: The Way to Wisdom. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

DELEUZE, G. (1993). The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (T. Conley, Trans.). London: Athlone Press.

DELEUZE, G. (1997). Essays Critical and Clinical (D. W. Smith & M. A. Greco, Trans.). Minnesota University Press.

DELEUZE, G. & GUATARI, F. (1986) Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature (D. Polan, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.

DELEUZE, G. & GUATARI, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.

DELUCCA, J. (1967). Wolfson on Spinoza's Use of the More Geometrico. Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie, Volume 6, Issue 1, June 1967, pp. 89 - 102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S001221730003523X

DEMOS, V. E. (2007). The Dynamics of Development. In C. Piers, J. P. Muller, & J. Brent (Eds.), Self-organizing complexity in psychological systems. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

DERRIDA, J. (2017). Dissemination (B. Johnson, Trans.). London: The Athlone Press.

DESCARTES, R. (1958a). Discourse on Method. In N. K. Smith (Trans.), Descartes Philosophical Writings. New York: The Modern Library.

DESCARTES, R. (1958b). Meditations on First Philosophy. In N. K. Smith (Trans.), Descartes Philosophical Writings. New York: The Modern Library.

DESCARTES, R. (1985a). Rules for the Direction of the Mind (D. Murdoch, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

DESCARTES, R. (1985b). The Principles of Philosophy. In J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch, (Trans.), The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. 1. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

FETISOV, A.I. (2017). Proof in geometry (Little Mathematics Library). Moscow: Mir Publishers.

FUYS, D.; GEDDES, D.; and TISCHER, R. (1988). The van Hiele Model of Thinking in Geometry Among Adolescents. Mathematics Education, Monograph Number 3. Vol. 3, pp. i+1-196. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Stable URL: hNp://www.jstor.org/stable/749957.

GARRET, D. (1996). Introduction. The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza (Sec. Ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

GARRET, D. & Sons Ltd.

GULLAN-WHUR, M. (1998). Within Reason: A Life of Spinoza. London: Pimlico.

HAMPSHIRE, S. (1956). Spinoza. London: Faber and Faber.

ISRAEL, J. I. (2023). Spinoza: Life and Legacy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

JANHKE, H. N. (2010). "The Conjoint Origin of Proof and Theoretical Physics". In Hanna, G.; Jahnke, H.N.; Pulte, H. (eds.). Explanation and Proof in Mathematics: Philosophical and Educational Perspectives. New York: Springer US.

JAQUET, C. (2018). Affects, Actions and Passions in Spinoza: The Unity of Body and Mind. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

KANT, I. (1991). An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’. In H. S. Reiss (Ed.), Kant: Political Writings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

KEPLER, J. (1979). L’harmonie du monde [Harmonices mundi]. Traduit par Jean Peyroux. Paris : A. Blanchard.

KEPLER, J. (2000). Optics: Paralipomena to Witelo and the Optical Part of Astronomy. Translated by William H. Donahue. Santa Fe: Green Lion

Press.

LANG, R. D. (1970). Knots. London: Tavistock Publications Limited.

MAIMONIDES, M. (1956). The Guide for the Perplexed (M. Friedlander, Trans.). Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

MONTAGUE, W. P. (1962). The Ways of Knowing or The Methods of Philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

NADLER, S. (2018). Spinoza: A Life (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

NICOD, J. (2014). Foundations of Geometry and Induction (P. P. Wiener, Trans.). London: Routledge.

PALAZUELOS, F. (2019). Becoming Child as Imagistic Process. (Tese de Doutorado). Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.

PALAZUELOS REBOLLEDO, F. & OLIVEIRA, A. M. (2020). Imagistic Projection as Relational Becoming. In: G. Menotti & V. Crisp (Eds.), Practices of Projection: Histories and Technologies (pp. 253-281). Oxford University Press.

PAULSEN, F. (1896). Introduction to Philosophy (2nd Ed.). (F. Thilly, Trans.). New York: Henry Holt and Company.

PLATO. (1952). The Dialogues of Plato (B. Jewett, Trans.). Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica.

PRINS, J. (2015). Echoes of an Invisible World: Marsilio Ficino and Francesco Patrizi on Cosmic Order and Music Theory. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill.

RAWES, P. (2008). Space, Geometry and Aesthetics: Through Kant and Towards Deleuze. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

ROVERE, M. (2018). Honors and theater: Spinoza’s pedagogical experience and his relation to F. Van den Enden. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 50(9), 809–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2017.1384722

SHMUELI, E. (1978). The Geometrical Method, Personal Caution, and the Idea of Tolerance. In J. I. Biro & R. W. Shahan (Eds.), Spinoza: New Perspectives. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

SPINOZA, B. (1951). A Theologico-political Treatise and A Political Treatise (R. H. M. Elwes, Trans.). Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

SPINOZA, B. (1955). The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza, vol. 2 (R. H. M. Elwes, Trans.). Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.

SPINOZA, B. (1996). Ethics (E. S. Curley, Trans.). London: Penguin Books.

SPINOZA, B. (2018). Ethics Proved in Geometrical Order (M. Silverthorne & M .J. Kisner, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

SPINOZA, B. (2020). Spinoza’s Ethics (G. Eliot, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

STRAUSS, L. (1952). Persecution and the Art of Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

TOROS, Y. (1990). Etude Spinoziste: Spinoza et l’espace projectif (Doctoral thesis). Paris: Université de Paris VIII - Vincennes.

USISKIN, Z. (1982). Van Hiele Levels and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry. CDASSG Project. Chicago: University of Chicago.

VANG-HIELE-GELDOF, D. (1984). Dissertation of Dina van Hiele-Geldof entitled: The Didactics of Geometry in the Lowest Class of Secondary School. In D. Fuys, D. Geddes, & R. Tischler (Eds.), English Translation of Selected Writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre M. van Hiele. New York: City University of New York/National Science Foundation.

VAN-HIELE, P. (1984). The Child’s Thought and Geometry. In: Fuys, David; Geddes, Dorothy; and Tischler, Rosamond, English Translation of Selected Writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre M. van Hiele. New York: City University of New York/National Science Foundation.

WHITEHEAD, A. N. (1958). An Introduction to Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

WIENER, N. (1976). The Relation of Space and Geometry to Experience. Collected Works with Commentaries, Volume 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

WOLFSON, H. A. (1934). The Philosophy of Spinoza (vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Zijpp, Nanne van der. (1956). “Collegiants”. Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online. Retrieved 23 October 2024, from https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Collegiants&oldid=120967.

Publicado

2025-06-30

Número

Sección

Artigos

Cómo citar

Palazuelos, F. R. . (2025). Revisiting the Geometric Order in Spinoza’s Ethics. Cadernos Espinosanos, 52, 31-66. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2447-9012.espinosa.2025.231714