Anticapital para o século XXI (sobre a metacrise do capitalismo e as possibilidades abertas para a política radical)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v25i1p149-163Palavras-chave:
capitalismo, crise, democracia, emancipação, hegemonia, marxismo, neoliberalismo, política radicalResumo
Tomando o caráter moderado dos protestos sociais recentes como seu ponto de partida, esta análise investiga as democracias liberais em seu estado atual, um estado em que a suposta crise do capitalismo entrou, ela própria, em crise – uma condição social de metacrise, marcada pela ausência de energias utópicas e da prospectiva de uma revolução –, ao mesmo tempo que a sociedade experiencia a si mesma em crise perpétua. Esta investigação apreende, então, o potencial de mudança radical pelo prisma da subversão do capitalismo (e não da derrubada dele ou da resistência a ele) através de práticas que combatam a própria dinâmica constitutiva do capitalismo – a produção de lucro.
Downloads
Referências
Apostolidis, P. (2018). The fight for time: migrant day laborers and the politics of precarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Azmanova, A. (2011a). Against the politics of fear: on deliberation, inclusion, and the political economy of trust. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 37 (2), pp. 401-12.
Azmanova, A. (2011b). After the left-right (dis)continuum: globalization and the remaking of Europe’s ideological geography. International Political Sociology, 5 (4), pp. 384-407.
Azmanova, A. (2012). The scandal of reason: a critical theory of political judgment. New York: Columbia University Press.
Azmanova, A. (2014). Crisis? capitalism is doing very well. How is critical theory? Constellations: an International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory, 21 (3), pp. 351-65.
Azmanova, A. (2018a). The populist catharsis: on the revival of the political. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 44 (4), pp. 399-411.
Azmanova, A. (2018b). Relational, structural and systemic forms of power: the “right to justification” confronting three types of domination. Journal of Political Power, 11 (1), pp. 68-78.
Azmanova, A. (2019). The emancipation paradox: populism, democracy, and the soul of the left. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 45 (9-10), pp. 1186-207.
Azmanova, A. (2020). Capitalism on edge. How fighting precarity can achieve radical change without crisis or utopia. New York: Columbia University Press.
Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: the powers of mourning and violence. New York: Verso.
Dean, J. (2009). Democracy and other neoliberal fantasies: communicative capitalism and left politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
Della Porta, D., Hänninen, S., Siisiäinen, M., & Silvasti, T. (2015). The precarization effect. In _____ (Orgs.), The new social division: making and unmaking precariousness (pp. 1-23). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Derrida, J. (2002 [1983]). Economies of the crisis. In Rottenberg, E. (Org.), Negotiations: interventions and interviews, 1971–2001 (pp. 69-73). Translated by Elizabeth Rottenberg. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Fraser, N. (2017a). Against progressive neoliberalism, a new progressive populism. Dissent. Recuperado de: https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/nancy-fraser-against-progressive-neoliberalism-progressive-populism. Acesso em: 9 abr. 2020.
Fraser, N. (2017b). The end of progressive neoliberalism. Dissent. Recuperado de: https://www.dissentmagazine.org/online_articles/progressive-neoliberalism-reactionary-populism-nancy-fraser. Acesso em: 9 abr. 2020.
Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from freedom. New York: Farrar and Rinehart.
Habermas, J. (1991 [1984]). The new obscurity: the crisis of the welfare state and the exhaustion of utopian energies. In Nicholsen, S. W. (Ed.), The new conservatism. Cultural criticism and the historians’ debate (pp. 48-70). Translated by Shierry Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kant, I. (1967). Philosophical correspondence 1759-99. Edited and translated by Arnulf Zweig. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kant, I. (2007 [1781]). Critique of pure reason. 2nd rev. ed. Translated by Norman Kemp Smith. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mouffe, C. (2018). For a left populism. London: Verso.
Mouffe, C., & Laclau, E. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.
Odendahl, C. (2017). The Hartz myth. A closer look at Germany’s labour market reforms. London: Centre for European Reform. Recuperado de: https://www.cer.eu/sites/default/files/pbrief_german_labour_19.7.17.pdf. Acesso em: 9 abr. 2020.
Price, J. J. (2001). Thucydides and internal war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rhodes, M. (2001). The political economy of social pacts: competitive corporatism and European welfare reform. In Pierson, P. (Ed.), The new politics of the welfare state (pp. 165-94). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: the new dangerous class. London: Bloomsbury.
Streeck, W. (1984). Neo-corporatist industrial relations and the economic crisis in West Germany. In Goldthorpe, J. H. (Ed.), Order and conflict in contemporary capitalism (pp. 291-314). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wright, E. O. (2019). How to be an anticapitalist in the twenty-first century. New York: Verso.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
As informações e conceitos emitidos em textos são de absoluta responsabilidade de seus autores.
Todos os artigos anteriores a 5 de julho de 2018 e posteriores a julho de 2021 estão licenciados sob uma licença CC BY-NC-ND, exceto os publicados entre as datas mencionadas, que estão sob a licença CC BY-NC-SA. A permissão para tradução por terceiros do material publicado sob a licença CC BY-NC-ND poderá ser obtida com o consentimento do autor ou autora.
Políticas de acesso aberto - Diadorim
