The ontological grounding of aesthetical judgment’s ethical structure in early German romanticism: for the historical-systematic construction of the Unending Judgment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v29i2p73-99Keywords:
Unending Judgement, Novalis, Schlegel, Kant, Early German RomanticismAbstract
Reading the fragments of Schlegel and Novalis in Blüthenstaub (2016), the article seeks to understand how the romantic thinkers ontologize Kant's argument regarding aesthetic judgment. To do this, we read the Analitik des Schönen, from the Kritik der Urteilskraft (1974b), to understand how the ethical structure of aesthetic judgment, suggested in Kant only by the as-if clause, receives an ontological interpretation in Novalis and Schlegel. We thus develop the figure of unending judgment, a concept with which we seek to circumscribe the triple movement by which Schlegel and Novalis ontologically ground the ethical structure of aesthetic judgment.
Downloads
References
Allison, H. (2001). Kant’s Theory of Taste. Cambridge: Cambrdgie University Press.
Beiser, F. (2002). German Idealism: the Struggle Against Subjectivism, 1781-1801. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Bowie, A. (1997). From Romanticism to Critical Theory: the philosophy of German literary theory. London: Routledge.
Bowie, A. (2003). Aesthetics and subjectivity. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Costa Lima, L. (2014). Mímesis: desafio ao pensamento. Santa Catarina: UFSC.
Frank, M. (1989). Einführung in der frühromantischen ästhetik: Vorlesungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
García, M. (2017). Menschliche Existenz und Metaphysik. In: Erhardt & Meißner. Wozu Metaphysik? München: Verlag Karl Alber.
Guyer, P. (1997). Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge: Cambrdgie University Press.
Heidegger, M. (2010). Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik. Frankfurt am Main: Vitorio Klostermann.
Holz, H. (1970). Spekulation und Faktizität: Zum Freiheitsbegriff des mittleren und späten Schelling. Bonn: Bouvier.
Hughes, F. (2007). Kant’s aesthetic epistemology: form and world. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
Kant, I. (1974a). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp taschenbuch.
Kant, I. (1974b). Kritik der Urteilskraft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp taschenbuch.
Kant, I. (2016). Crítica da Faculdade de Julgar. Tradução de Fernando Costa Matos. Petrópolis: Vozes.
Lebrun, G. (2002). Kant e o fim da metafísica. 2ª ed. São Paulo, SP: Martins Fontes
Levinas, E. (1971). Totalité et infini: essai sur l'extériorité. Paris: Le Livre de Poche, 1971.
Loureiro. G. (2024) Saudade do Infinito: ensaios de metafísica romântica I. Belo Horizonte: Quixote + e Associadas.
Novalis. (2016). Blüthenstaub. Berlin: Hofenberg.
Pareyson, L. (2017). Ontologia da liberdade: o mal e o sofrimento. Tradução de Vinicius Honesko. São Paulo: Edições Loyola.
Pinkard. T. (2014). German Philosophy 1760-1860: The Legacy of Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pippin, R. (1982). Kant’s Theory of Form: an Essay on the Critique of Pure Reason. Yale: Yale University Press.
Schlegel, F. Fragmente. (1973). In Hans, E. & Mohrlüder, G. (Orgs.) Ironie als literarische Phänomen. Stuttgart: Neue Wissenschaftliche Bibliothek.
Schelling, F. W. J. (1985). Philosophische Einleitung zur Philosophie der Mytologie. In Frank, M. (Org.), Ausgewählte Schriften, Band 5. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Schelling, F. W. J. (1995). Zur Geschichte der neueren Philosophie. In: Frank, M. (org.), Ausgewählte Schriften, Band 4. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Schuback, M. de S. C. (1998). O começo de Deus: a filosofia do devir no pensamento tardio de F. W. J. Schelling. Petrópolis: Vozes.
Strawson, P. (1975) The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Abingdon: Routledge.
Tilliette, X. (1987). L'Absolu et la philosophie: essais sur Schelling. Paris: PUF.
Uehling, T. E. (1971). The Notion of Form in Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Paris: The Hague.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gabriel Loureiro Pereira da Mota Ramos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Information and conceptions on the texts are complete responsibility of the authors.
All the articles submitted before July 5th 2018 and those published after July 2021 are licensed under a CC BY-NC-ND license – except those published between the aforementioned dates, which are under the CC BY-NC-SA license. The permission for the translation of the material published under the license CC BY-NC-ND by third parts can be obtained with the consent of the author.
Open access policies - Diadorim
Rules applied before July 5th 2018:
Presenting a submission to our Editorial Board implies granting priority of publication for “Cadernos de filosofia alemã”, as well as transferring the copyright of texts (once published), which will be reproduced only with the manifest authorization of the editors. Authors keep the right to reuse the texts published in future editions of their work, without paying any fees to "Cadernos”. We will not grant the permission to re-edit or translate the texts for third parts without agreement of the author.
