The Legacy of Hermes: Deception and Dialectic in Plato’s Cratylus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v10i1p26-58Keywords:
Cratylus, Name, Language, Hermes, EtymologyAbstract
Against the background of a conventionalist theory, and staged as a defense of a naturalistic notion of names and naming, the critique of language developed in Plato’s Cratylus does not only propose that human language, in contrast to the language of the gods, is bound to the realm of myth and lie. The dialogue also concludes by offering a set of reasons to think that knowledge of reality is not within the reach of our words. Interpretations of the dialogue’s long etymological sections often neglect this critique and tend to end up with an overly optimistic assessment of the theory of language on offer. In the light of one of the dialogue’s central etymological accounts, Socrates’ etymology of the name Hermes, this paper discusses two recent and influential versions of such a view: David Sedley’s theory of onomatopoetic encapsulation and Franco Trivigno’s qualified referentialism. It argues that the complex relation between language and reality expressed in the Cratylus cannot be exhaustively captured by either of these theories because Plato considers all names to be semantically underdetermined until they are put to use. It suggests that Plato rather works with a functionalistic notion of names and naming, and that the dialogue’s account of natural and correct naming is to be understood in these terms.
Downloads
References
Anagnostopoulos, G. 1972. ‘Plato's Cratylus: The Two Theories of the Correctness of Names’ Review of Metaphysics 25 (4): 691-736.
Ademollo, F. 2011. The Cratylus of Plato: A Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511779022
Arieti, J.A. 1991. Interpreting Plato: The Dialogues as Drama. Savage (Maryland): Rowman & Littlefield.
Barney, R. 2001. Names and Nature in Plato’s Cratylus. New York and London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203800645
Barney, R. 1998. ‘Socrates Agonistes: the Case of the Cratylus Etymologies’ Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 16: 63-98.
Barney, R. 1997. ‘Plato on conventionalism’ Phronesis 42 (2): 143-162. DOI: 10.1163/156852897762700070
Baxter, T. 1992. The Cratylus: Plato’s Critique of Naming. Leiden, New York, Köln: Brill.
Benardete, S. 1980. ‘Physics and Tragedy: On Plato’s Cratylus’ Ancient Philosophy 1: 127-140. DOI: 10.5840/ancientphil1981123
Brock, R. 1990. ‘Plato and Comedy’ 39-49 in E.M. Craik ed. Owls to Athens: Essays on Classical Subjects Presented to Sir Kenneth Dover. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Brown, N.O. 2012. Hermes The Thief: The Evolution Of A Myth, Literary Licensing.
Ewegen, M. 2013. Plato's Cratylus: The Comedy of Language. Indiana University Press.
Findlay, J.N. 1973. Plato: The Written and Unwritten Doctrines. New York: Humanities Press.
Fowler, H.N. 1921. Translation of the Cratylus in Plato in Twelve Volumes. Vol.12. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. London: William Heinemann Ltd.
Goldschmidt, V. 1940. Essai sur le Cratyle: contribution à l’histoire de la pensée de Platon. Paris: Librairie Ancienne Honoré Champion.
Gonzalez, F.J. 1998. Dialectic and Dialogue: Plato’s Practice of Philosophical Inquiry. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Grote, G. 1867. Plato and the Other Companions of Socrates. Vol. 2. London: J. Murray.
Ketchum, R.J. 1979. ‘Names, Forms and Conventionalism: Cratylus, 383-395’ Phronesis 24 (2):133-147. DOI: 10.1163/156852879x00081
Kirkland, S. D. 2007. ‘Logos as the Message From the Gods: On the Etymology of Hermes in Plato's Cratylus’ Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 12 (1): 1-14.
Kretzmann, N. 1971. ‘Plato on the Correctness of Names’ American Philosophical Quarterly 8 (2): 126-138.
Luce, J.V. 1969. ‘Plato on Truth and Falsity in Names’ Classical Quarterly 63: 222-33. DOI: 10.1017/s0009838800024630
Luce, J.V. 1964. ‘The Date of the Cratylus’ The American Journal of Philology 85(2): 136-154. DOI: 10.2307/293061
Nightingale, A. 2003. ‘Subtext and Subterfuge in Plato’s Cratylus’ 223-240 in A.N. Michelini ed. Plato as Author: The Rhetoric of Philosophy. Leiden: Brill.
Mackenzie, M.M. 1986. ‘Putting the Cratylus in its Place’ Classical Quarterly 36 (1): 124-150. DOI: 10.1017/s0009838800010600
Riley, M.W. 2005. Plato's Cratylus: Argument, Form, and Structure. Amsterdam: Rodopi B.V.
Reeve, C.D.C. 1997. Translation of Plato’s Cratylus in Cooper ed. Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Sallis, J. 1996. Being and Logos: Reading the Platonic Dialogues. 3rd edn. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Schofield, M, 1972. ‘A Displacement in the Text of the Cratylus’ Classical Quarterly 22 (2): 246-253. DOI: 10.1017/s0009838800042051
Sedley, D. 2007. ‘Plato on Language’ in H. H. Benson ed. A Companion to Plato. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/9780470996256.ch15
Sedley, D. 1998. ‘The Etymologies in Plato's Cratylus’ Journal of Hellenic Studies 118: 140-154. DOI: 10.2307/632235
Sedley, D. 2003. Plato’s Cratylus. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511482649
Silverman, A. 2001. ‘The End of the Cratylus’ Ancient Philosophy 21 (1): 25-43. DOI: 10.5840/ancientphil20012115
Schofield, M. 1972. ‘A Displacement in the text of the Cratylus’ Classical Quarterly 22, 246-5. DOI: 10.1017/s0009838800042051
Smith, I. 2014. ‘Taking the Tool Analogy Seriously: Forms and Naming in the Cratylus’ The Cambridge Classical Journal 60, 75-99. DOI: 10.1017/s1750270514000037
Thomas, J.C. 2008. ‘Inquiry Without Names in Plato’s Cratylus’ Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (3): 341-364. DOI: /10.1353/hph.0.0027
Trivigno, F.V. 2012. ‘Etymology and the Power of Names in Plato's Cratylus’ Ancient Philosophy 32 (1): 35-75. DOI: 10.5840/ancientphil20123213
Weingartner, R. 1970. ‘Making Sense of the Cratylus’ Phronesis 15: 5-25. DOI: 10.1163/156852870x00026
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
