The Use of Aristotle’s Biology in Nemesius’ On Human Nature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v15i2p170-189Keywords:
Nemesius, Galen, Aristotle, body and soulAbstract
Towards the end of the fourth century CE Nemesius, bishop of Emesa in Syria, composed his treatise On Human Nature (Περὶ φύσεως ἀνθρώπου). The nature of the soul and its relation to the body are central to Nemesius’ treatment. In developing his argument, he draws not only on Christian authors but on a variety of pagan philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, the Stoics and the great physician-cum-philosopher Galen of Pergamum. This paper examines Nemesius’ references to Aristotle’s biology in particular, focusing on a few passages in the light of Aristotle’s Generation of Animals and History of Animals as well as the doxographic tradition. The themes in question are: the status of the intellect, the scale of nature and the respective roles of the male and female in reproduction. Central questions are: Exactly which impact did Aristotle make on his thinking? Was it mediated or direct? Why does Nemesius cite Aristotle and how? Long used as a source for earlier works now lost, Nemesius’ work may provide intriguing glimpses of the intellectual culture of his time. This paper is designed to contribute to this new approach to his work.
Downloads
References
Boudon-Millot, V. and B. Pouderon, eds., Les Pères de l’Église face à la science médicale de leur temps (Paris: Duchesne, 2005).
Connell, S. Aristotle on Female Animals: A Study of the Generation of Animals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).
Diels, H. Doxographi Graeci. (Berlin: Reimer, De Gruyter and Cambridge University Press, 1879 with later reprints).
Festugière, A.J. “Aristote dans la littérature grecque chrétienne jusqu’à Théodoret”, in L’idéal religieux des Grecs et l’Évangile (Paris: Librairie Lecofre / J. Gabalda Et Cie, 1932).
Freeland, C. “Aristotle on Bodies, Matter and Potentiality,” in Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, eds. A. Gotthelf & J.G. Lennox (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 392–407.
Gottschalk, H. “Aristotelian philosophy in the Roman world,” ANRW II, 36.2 (1987), 1079-1174.
Jaeger, W.W. Nemesius von Emesa, (Berlin: Weidmann, 1914).
Kallis, A. Der Mensch im Kosmos: das Weltbild Nemesios’ von Emesa, Münsterische Beiträge zur Theologie 43 (Münster: Aschendorff, 1978).
Karamanolis, G. “Early Christian Philosophers on Aristotle,” in Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, ed. A. Falcon (Leiden: Brill, 2016), 460–479.
Lavalle Norman, D.T. “Becoming Female: Marrowy Semen and the Formative Mother in Methodius of Olympus’ Symposium”, Journal of Early Christian Studies 27.2 (2019), 185-209.
Limone, V. “Origen’s Explicit References to Aristotle and the Peripateticians”, Vigiliae Christianae 72.4 (2018), 390-404.
Mansfeld, J. “Doxography and Dialectic. The Sitz im Leben of the Placita,” ANRW II 36.4 (1990): 3076-3077.
Mansfeld, J. “Aristotle in the Aëtian Placita,” in Falcon, ed., Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity, (Leiden: Brill, 2016), 299-318.
Morani, M. Nemesio di Emesa. La natura dell’ uomo (Salerno: Grafiche Moriniello, 1982).
Mansfeld, J. & D.T. Runia, Aëtiana. The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer. Volume One: The Sources (Leiden: Brill, 1996).
Mansfeld, J. & D.T. Runia, Aëtiana Vol. II. The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer. The Compendium, Part One (Leiden: Brill, 2009)
Mansfeld J. & D.T. Runia, Aëtiana V. An Edition of the Reconstructed text of the Placita with a Commentary and a Collection of Related Texts. 4 vols. (Leiden: Brill, 2020).
Motta, B. “Nemesius of Emesa”, in The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity, ed. L.P. Gerson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 509-519.
Pope, M. “Luke’s Seminal Annunciation: An Embryological Reading of Mary’s Conception,” JBL 138,4 (2019), 791-807.
Runia, D.T. “Festugière Revisited. Aristotle in the Greek Patres,” in Vigiliae Christianae 43.1 (1989), 1-34.
Schrenk, L. ed., Aristotle in Late Antiquity (Catholic University of America Press, 1994).
Scott, A. “Pseudo-Aristotle’s Historia Animalium 9 in Origen”, The Harvard Theological Review 85 (1992), 235–239.
Sharples, R.W. Peripatetic Philosophy 200 BC to AD 200 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Sharples, R.W. and Ph. J. Van der Eijk, Nemesius on the Nature of Man (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2008).
Siclari, L’antropologia di Nemesio di Emesa (Padua: La Garangola, 1974).
Skard, E. “Nemesiosstudien: 3. Nemesios und die Elementenlehre des Galenos,” Symbolae Osloenses 18 (1938), 31-41.
Streck, M. “Aristotelische und neuplatonische Elemente in der Anthropologie des Nemesius von Emesa”, Studia Patristica 34 (2001), 559-564.
Telfer, W. Cyril of Jerusalem and Nemesius of Emesa (London: SCM Press, 1955).
Telfer, W. “The Birth of Christian Anthropology,” JTS 13 (1962), 347-54.
Tieleman, T. Chrysippus On Affections. Reconstruction and Interpretation (Leiden: Brill, 2003).
Tieleman, T. “The Spirit of Stoicism,” in The Holy Spirit, Inspiration, and the Cultures of Antiquity. Multidisciplinary Perspectives, eds. J. Frey and J.R. Levison (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014), 39-62.
Tieleman, T. “Galen and Doxography,” in Aëtiana IV: Papers of the Melbourne Colloquium on Ancient Doxography, eds. J. Mansfeld & D.T. Runia (Leiden: Brill, 2018), 452-471.
van der Eijk, P.J. “Galen on the Nature of Human Beings,” in Philosophical Themes in Galen, eds. Adamson, Hansberger & Wilberding (London: BICS, 2014), 89–134.
van der Horst, P.W. “Sarah’s Seminal Emission: Hebrews 11:11 in the Light of Ancient Embryology,” in Van der Horst, Hellenism – Judaism – Christianity: Essays on Their Interaction (Kampen: Kok Pharos, 1994), 203-224.
Verbeke, G. and J.R. Moncho, eds., Némésius d’Émèse, De natura hominis, traduction de Burgundio de Pise. Corpus Latinum commentariorum in Aristotelem Graecorum, Suppl. I. (Leiden: Brill, 1975).
Wallace-Hadrill, The Greek Patristic View of Nature (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1968).
Weissenrieder, A. “What does σωθήσεσθαι δὲ διὰ τεκνογονίας ‘to be saved by childbearing’ mean (1 Timothy 2:15)? Insights from Ancient Medical and Philosophical Texts,” Early Christianity 5 (3) (2014), 313-336.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
