Experiencing failure: the twofold cause of error in Stoicism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v19i1p144-170Keywords:
Stoicism, epistemology, ontologyAbstract
According to Stoicism, nature has endowed us with reason, enabling us, through the function of kataleptic impressions, to perceive the world truly. Yet most people deviate from this ideal. To explain this, the Stoics identify two causes: (a) the persuasiveness of impressions and (b) the teachings of our associates. While both Galen and Posidonius challenge the validity of these causes, and many scholars highlight their complexity, this paper aims to provide a deeper Stoic foundation for them.
As I will propose, addressing these two causes requires a comprehensive analysis of several aspects of Stoic ontology, epistemology, and causation. This paper argues that the persuasiveness of impressions is rooted, on the one hand, in the intricate causal structure of the Stoic world and the similarities between the causal interactions our soul establishes with virtue and preferable externals, and, on the other hand, in the resemblance between the affections experienced in both passions and virtuous emotions—specifically, the experience of expansion and contraction of the soul when we gain or are deprived of something.
Furthermore, I will contend that the influence of associates affects our evaluative judgments due to the causal power of beliefs, which is continually reinforced by the persuasiveness of relevant impressions. To support these conclusions, a detailed examination of both the Stoic theory of causation and the status of sayables in Stoic ontology is essential.
Downloads
References
Algra K. (2003), “Stoic Theology” in Inwood, B. (Ed.) The Cambridge companion to the Stoics, Cambridge University Press.
Annas, J. (1990), “Stoic epistemology” in Everson S. (ed.) Epistemology, Companions to ancient thought, 1, pp 184-203, Cambridge University Press.
Annas J. (1992), Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Arthur, E. P. (1983), “The stoic analysis of the mind's reactions to presentations”, Hermes, pp. 69-78, Franz Steiner Verlag, Germany.
Bobzien, S. (1998), Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy, Oxford.
Bréhier, É. (1987), La théorie des incorporels dans l’ancien stoïcisme, Vrin, Paris.
Brennan, T. (1998), “The old Stoic theory of emotions” in (Sihvola, Engberg-Pedersen eds) The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy (pp 21-70), Springer, Dordrecht.
Bronowski, A., (2019), The Stoics on Lekta: All There Is to Say, Oxford Classical Monographs.
Brunschwig, J. & Sedley, D., (2003), “Hellenistic philosophy” in (Sedley, Gutting, eds.) The Cambridge companion to Greek and Roman philosophy (pp. 151-183), Cambridge University Press.
Caston, V. (1999), “Something and nothing: the Stoics on concepts and universals” in Sedley (ed.) Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17 (pp.145-213), Oxford University Press.
Collette, B. (2021), The Stoic Doctrine of Providence: A Study of Its Development and of Some of Its Major Issues, Routledge.
Edelstein, L. & Kidd, I. G. (Eds.) (1989), Posidonius (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.
Frede, M. (1986), “The Stoic Doctrine of the Affections of the Soul” in Schofield, Striker (eds.) The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics (pp. 93–110), Proceedings of the Third Symposium Hellenisticum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frede, M. (1987), Essays in ancient philosophy, University of Minnesota Press.
Frede, M. (1990), “An empiricist view of knowledge” in Everson (ed.) Epistemology (pp. 225-250), Cambridge.
Frede, M. (1994), “The Stoic Notion of a lekton.” in Everson (ed.), Language (pp 109–28) (= Companions to Ancient Thought, vol. 3.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frede, M. (1999), “Stoic Epistemology” in Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld, Schofield (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy (pp.295–322), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goerler W. (2004), “Ασθενής συγκατάθεσις: Zur Stoischen Erkrnntnistheorie” in Kleine Schriften zur hellenistisch-römischen Philosophie (pp. 1-15), Brill.
Gourinat, J. B. (1996), Les stoïciens et l’âme, Presses Universitaires de France - PUF.
Graver, M. (2007), Stoicism and Emotion, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Gill, C. (2006), The structured self in Hellenistic and Roman thought, OUP Oxford.
Inwood B. (1985), Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Hankinson R. J. (2006), “Stoic Epistemology” in Inwood, B. (Ed.). The Cambridge companion to the Stoics, Cambridge University Press.
Irvine, W. B. (2008). A guide to the good life: The ancient art of Stoic joy. Oxford University Press.
Klein, J. (2015), “Making sense of Stoic indifferents” in Inwood (ed.) Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 49, Oxford University Press.
Klein, J. (2016), “The Stoic argument from oikeiōsis” in Caston (ed.) Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 50, Oxford University Press.
Long, A.A. και Sedley D.N., (1987), The Hellenistic Philosophers (2 Volumes), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Long, A. A. (2002), Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic guide to life, Clarendon Press.
Magee, J. (2016), On Plato’s Timaeus. Calcidius, Cambridge, Mass. - London: Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (1994), The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sedley, D. (1997), “Philosophical allegiance in the Greco-Roman world” in Barnes & Griffin (eds.), Philosophia togata. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sedley, D. (Ed) (2003), The Cambridge companion to Greek and Roman philosophy, Cambridge University Press.
Totschnig, W. (2013): “Bodies and their Effects: The Stoics on Causation and Incorporeals”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95:119–147.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Panagiotis Poulakidas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
