Beyond technē: Thrasymachus, legitimacy, and the appearance of justice: a reply to Menezes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v19i2p1-17Abstract
This paper offers a new interpretation of Thrasymachus’ thesis in Republic I (338c–341a). Against readings that reduce his position either to sophistic cynicism or to a purely technical account of rule, I argue that Thrasymachus advances an implicit theory of legitimacy. Through a close reading of Socrates’ Polydamas parody (339a) and the technē exchange (340d–341a), I develop what I call the Principle of Appearances (PA): political power survives only when coercion presents itself as truth. This performative dimension clarifies why Thrasymachus demands the ruler’s infallibility and why law (nomos) appears as the advantage of the stronger. The paper situates this paradox of legitimation within the genealogy of political realism, from Plato’s dramatic text through Machiavelli’s verità effettuale della cosa to Bernard Williams’s Basic Legitimation Demand. The conclusion is that justice, for Thrasymachus, is not simply kratos or technē, but the linguistic and symbolic form by which domination sustains itself as acceptable order.
Downloads
References
BOTERO, G. (2017). The Reason of State. Robert Bireley (ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
BURNET, J. (1903) Platonis Opera, Vol. 3: Tetralogiae V–VII. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
EVERSON, S. (2020). Thrasymachus on Justice, Rulers, and Laws in Republic I. Journal of Ancient Philosophy, v. 14, n. 2, p. 76–98. 10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v14i2p76-98
GUICCIARDINI F. (1965). Maxims and Reflections of a Renaissance Statesman (Ricordi); Introduction by Nicolai Rubinstein. Translated by Domandi, Mario. Evanston and London: Harper Torchbooks. New York.
HOURANI, G.F. (1947). “Justice as Political Obedience in Thrasymachus.” Classical Philology 42, no. 3 (1947): p.161–175.
HOURANI, G.F. (1962). Thrasymachus' Definition of Justice in Plato's Republic Phronesis 7(1–2): 110–120.
KERFERD, G. B. (1976). The Doctrine of Thrasymachus in Plato’s Republic. Durham University Journal, v. 40, p. 19-27 (1947); reprinted in Classen, C. J. Sophistik. Wege der Forschung, vol. 187, Darmstadt, p. 545-563.
MENEZES, L. M. B. R. (2019). Thrasymachus’ government: an analogy with Machiavelli’s Prince. Journal of Ancient Philosophy 13(2): 1–13. 10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v18i2p01-13.
NAWAR, T. (2018). Thrasymachus’ Unerring Skill and the Arguments of Republic 1. Phronesis, v. 63, p. 359-391.
ROSSI E. (2019). Being Realistic and Demanding the Impossible.” Constellations 26, no. 4. p. 638–652, 10.1111/1467-8675.12446
ROSSI E. and SLEAT (2014). Realism in Normative Political Theory. Philosophy Compass 9, no. 10. p. 689–701. 10.1111/phc3.12148
SLEAT M. (2014). Legitimacy in Realist Thought: Between Moralism and Realpolitik. Political Theory vol 42, i. 3 10.1177/0090591714522250
SLINGS, S. R. (2003). Platonis Rempvblicam, recognovit brevique adnotatione critica instrvxit: S. R.Slings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
SPARSHOTT F. E. (1966). Socrates and Thrasymachus, The Monist 50(3): 330–349.
SPARSHOTT, F. E. (1988). An Argument for Thrasymachus. Apeiron 21(2): 1–20.
STRAUSS, L. (1964). The City and Man. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
VLASTOS, G. (1971). Justice and Happiness in the Republic in Plato II: A Collection of Critical Essays; Ethics, Politics and Philosophy of Art and Wisdom, ed. Gregory Vlastos (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 66–95.
WEISS, R. (2021). Socrates and Thrasymachus on perfect and imperfect injustice. Plato Journal, v. 22, p. 79-86.
WILLIAMS, B. (2005). In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Edited by Geoffrey Hawthorn. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gábor Szabó
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
