Voice as Difference in Aristotelian Zoology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v7i1p1-18Keywords:
Aristotle, zoology, method, animal life, soul, psychology, languageAbstract
The Aristotelian treatment of animal voice reveals a significant wealth of philosophical issues and methodological approaches. The capability to emit voice, in fact, concerns different aspects of animal life, which Aristotle studies both from the point of view of the different aspects of the soul’s activity involved in phonation, and from the point of view of the bodily parts in control of voice emission and articulation. This paper attempts to provide a general survey of these issues.Downloads
References
AA.VV. 1968. Animal communication. ed. by T. A. Sebeok, Indianapolis.
Apostle, H. G. 1980. Aristotle, Categories and Propositions (De Interpretatione). Grinnel (Iowa).
Arbo, A. 1998. ‘Gli uccelli cantano davvero?’. Rivista di estetica, n.s., 8, XXXVIII: 113-126.
Aristotele. 2004. De partibus animalium, introduzione, traduzione e commento a cura di A. L. Carbone, Milano, Rizzoli.
Ax, W. yo@fov, fwnh@ und dia@lektov als Grundbegriffe aristotelischer Sprachreflexion’ Glotta LVI, pp. 245-271.
Carbone, A. L. 1998. ‘La sensazione come tratto distintivo dell’animale nella zoologia aristotelica’. Rivista di Estetica, n.s., 8, XXXVIII: 95-112.
Frede, D. 'The cognitive role of phantasia in Aristotle', in AA.VV. Essays on Aristotle's De anima, ed. by M. C. Nussbaum and A. Oksenberg-Rorty, Oxford 1992. pp. 279-295. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/019823600X.003.0016
Gontier, T. 1999. L’homme et l’animal. La philosophie antique, Paris.
Labarrière, J.-L. 1984. ‘Imagination humaine et imagination animale chez Aristote’. Phronesis, 29: 17-49. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852884X00175
Laspia, P. L’articolazione linguistica. Origini biologiche di una metafora, Roma 1997.
Polansky, R.; Kuczewski, M. 1990. ‘Speech and Thought, Symbol and Likeness: Aristotle’s De Interpretatione 16a 3-9’ Apeiron, 23: 51-63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.1990.23.1.51
Preus, A. Science and philosophy in Aristotle’s biological works, Olms 1975.
Schofield, M. 1992. ‘Aristotle on the imagination’ in AA.VV. Essays on Aristotle's De anima, ed. by M. C. Nussbaum and A. Oksenberg-Rorty, Oxford: 249-277.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/019823600X.003.0015
Sorabji, R. 1997. ‘Esprits d'animaux’. in: AA.VV. L’animal dans l’antiquité, édité par B. Cassin et J.-L. Labarrière, sous la direction de G. Romeyer Dherbey, Paris 1997.
Sorabji, R. 1992. ‘Intentionality and physiological processes: Aristotle’s theory of sense perception’ in AA.VV., Essays on Aristotle's De anima, ed. by M. C. Nussbaum and A. Oksenberg-Rorty, Oxford: 195-225. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/019823600X.003.0013
Waitz, T. 1965. Aristoteles Organon. Aallen; Neudruck der Ausgabe Leipzig [1844].
Zanatta, M. 1992. Aristotele, De interpretatione, Milano.
Zirin, R. 1979. 'Aristotle’s biology of language', Transactions of the American Philological Association, CX: 325-347.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/284226
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).