Plotinus on Transmigration: a Reconsideration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v7i1p49-64Keywords:
Plotinus, transmigration, soul, virtue, moral, metaphysics, reincarnation, Neoplatonism, dual-aspect theory of the soulAbstract
The aim of this paper is to reconsider Plotinus’ account of transmigration in the light of his dual-aspect theory of the soul. It is argued that transmigration is discussed in the Enneads only in relation to the lower perceptible part of the soul. The higher intelligible part of the soul remains undescended and uninvolved in any kind of transmigration. Plotinus’ treatment of transmigration also aims at emphasizing the soul’s higher life of virtue. The noble soul concentrates on its higher intelligible part in constant contemplation of the Forms without being affected by its lower perceptible part and therefore transmigration.
Downloads
References
Armstrong, A. H. 1966-1988. Plotinus. 7 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Blumenthal H. J. 1966. ‘Did Plotinus Believe in Ideas of Individuals?’ Phronesis 11, 1: 61-80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852866X00139
Blumenthal, H. J. 1971 Plotinus’ Psychology. The Hague: Martinus Nijhorf.
Clark, S. R. L. 1996. ‘Plotinus: Body and Soul’ in L. P. Gerson ed. The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 275-291. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521470935.012
Diels, H. 1951-2. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. 6th ed. Revised with additions and index by W. Kranz, Berlin: Weidmann.
Dillon, J. M. 1992. ‘Plotinus at Work on Platonism’ Greece & Rome 39, 2: 189-204.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0017383500024177
Dillon, J. M. 1996. ‘An ethic for the late antique sage’ in L. P. Gerson ed. The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 315-335. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521470935.014.
Dörrie, H. 1957. ‘Kontroversen um die Seelenwanderung im kaiserzeitlichen Platonismus'. Hermes 85: 414-435.
Helleman-Elgersma, W. 1980 Soul-Sisters. A Commentary on Enneads IV, 3 (27) 1-8 of Plotinus. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Henry, P. and H. R. Schwyzer. 1964-1982. Plotini Opera. editio minor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Inge, W. R. 1929. The Philosophy of Plotinus. vol. II. London: Longmans, Green & Co.
Inwood, B. 2001. The Poem of Empedocles: A Text with an Introduction. Revised Edition. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Kalligas, P. 1994. Plotinus’ Ennead I: Ancient Greek text, translation and commentary. Athens: Centre of Edition of Ancient Greek Authors.
Kalligas, P. 1997. Plotinus Ennead II: Ancient Greek text, translation and commentary. Athens: Centre of Edition of Ancient Greek Authors.
Kalligas, P. 2004. Plotinus Ennead III: Ancient Greek text, translation and commentary. Athens: Centre of Edition of Ancient Greek Authors.
Kalligas, P. 2009. Plotinus Ennead IV: Ancient Greek text, translation and commentary. Athens: Centre of Edition of Ancient Greek Authors.
Leftow, B. 2011. ‘The humanity of God’ 20-44 in Anna Marmodoro and Jonathan Hill edd. The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583164.003.0002
Luchte, J. 2009. Pythagoras and the doctrine of transmigration: wandering souls. Continuum.
Pistorius, P. V. 1952. Plotinus and Neoplatonism: An Introductory Study. Cambridge: Bowes & Bowes.
Plass, P. 1982. ‘Plotinus' ethical theory’ Illinois Classical Studies 7, 2: 241-259.
Puech, H.-Ch. 1960. ‘Plotin et les Gnostiques’. in Les sources de Plotin. Entretiens sur l'antiquité class. 5, Vandoeuvres-Genève, Fond. Hardt: 159-190.
Rangos, S. 1999. ‘Between Physics and Nous: Logos as Principle of Meditation in Plotinus’. Journal of Neoplatonic Studies 7, 2: 1-42.
Remes, P. 2006. ‘Plotinus’ ethics of disinterested interest’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44: 1-23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hph.2006.0006
Remes, P. 2007 Plotinus on self: the philosophy of the 'We'. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597411
Rich, A. N. M. 1957. ‘Reincarnation in Plotinus’ Mnemosyne 10: 232-238. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852557X00204
Rist, J. M. 1963 ‘Forms of Individuals in Plotinus’ The Classical Quarterly 13, 2: 223-231. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800001828
Rist, J. M. 1965. ‘Monism. Plotinus and some predecessors’ Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 69: 329-344. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/310786
Roussos, E. 2007. Empedocles. Athens: Stigmi.
Smith, A. 1974. Porphyry's Place in the Neoplatonic Tradition. A Study in post-Plotinian Neoplatonism. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Smith, A. 1984. ‘Did Porphyry Reject the Transmigration of Human Souls into Animals?’ Rheinisches Museum für Philologie Band, Heft I: 276-284.
Smith, A. 1987. ‘Porphyrian Studies Since 1913’. in Haase, W. Aufstieg und
Niedergang der Römischen Welt II.36.2, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter: 717-773.
Smith, A. 1999. ‘The significance of practical ethics for Plotinus’. in Cleary, J. J. ed. Traditions of Platonism: Essays in Honor of John Dillon. Aldershot: 227-236.
Stamatellos, G. 2007 Plotinus and the Presocratics. Albany: SUNY Press.
Stamatellos, G. 2012 Introduction to Presocratics: A Thematic Approach to Early Greek Philosophy with Key Readings. Wiley-Blackwell.
Schniewind, A. (2003) L’Éthique du Sage chez Plotin. Le paradigme du spoudaios. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.
Stern-Gillet, S. 2009. 'Dual Selfhood and Self-Perfection in the Enneads'. Epoché 13, 2: 331- 345. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/epoche200913210
Stubenberg, L. 2010. 'Neutral Monism' in: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2010 ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/neutral-monism/>.
Vogel (De), C. J. 1969. 'The monism of Plotinus'. Philosophia: Studies in Greek Philosophy 1: 399-416.
Wallis, R. T. 1995 Neoplatonism. London: Duckworth.
Westerink, L.G. 2009 The Greek commentaries on Plato's Phaedo: Olympiodorus, vol. 1, Prometheus Trust.
Wright, M. R. 1981. Empedocles: The Extant Fragments. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).