How to Individuate the Powers of Knowledge and Opinion in Plato's Republic V
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v8i2p92-115Keywords:
Plato, Republic, powers, knowledge, opinion, beliefAbstract
At the end of Republic V Socrates argues that differences between knowledge and opinion justify rule by philosophers in his ideal city; within this argument he gives a theory of powers. The theory contains a logical gap: Socrates mentions two criteria by which he individuates powers, yet assumes in his argument that both criteria will speak with a single voice. I argue that these criteria are two ways of picking out a power’s manifestation—that is, the change a power is directed toward; I shall call this view the Identity Reading. Since they refer to a single phenomenon, the results of consulting both criteria cannot differ. The Identity Reading both solves the logical problem with the argument and sheds light four other features of the passage. This reading also provides support for what Gail Fine has called the “contents analysis” of a power’s relation to its “objects,” as opposed to the “objects analysis.”Downloads
References
Allen, Archibald. “A Double Hendiadys in Sophocles”. Glotta 60, nos. 3/4 (1982): 235.
Annas, Julia. An introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.
Barney, Rachel. “Review of Explorations in Ancient and Modern Philosophy, Volumes 1–2, Cambridge University Press 2012, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews”. October 2013.
Bird, Alexander. Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Boylu, Ayca. “The Powers Argument in Plato’s Republic”. History of Philosophy Quarterly 28, number 2 (2011): 107–24.
Crombie, I. M. An examination of Plato’s doctrines. New York: Humanities Press, 1962.
Crystal, Ian. “Parmenidean Allusions in Republic V”. Ancient Philosophy 16 (1996): 351–363. DOI: 10.5840/ancientphil199616239
Denniston, J. D. The Greek particles. 2nd. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954.
Fine, Gail. “Knowledge and Belief in Republic 5-7”. in Plato on Knowledge and Forms, edited by Gail Fine, 85–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Fine, Gail. “Knowledge and Belief in Republic V”. in Plato on Knowledge and Forms, 66–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Gonzalez, Francisco. “Propositions or Objects? A Critique of Gail Fine on Knowledge and Belief in Republic V”. Phronesis 41, number 3 (1996): 245–275. DOI: 10.1163/156852896321051620
Gosling, J.C. “Δόξα and Δύναμις in Plato’s Republic”. Phronesis 13, number 2 (1968): 119–130.
Grube, G. M. A., and C. D. C. Reeve, translators. Plato: Republic. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1992.
Heil, John. From an Ontological Point of View. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. DOI: 10.1093/0199259747.001.0001
Hintikka, Jaakko. “Knowledge and Its Objects in Plato”. In Patterns in Plato’s Thought, edited by J. M. E. Moravcsik, 7–18. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1973. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-2545-4_1
Liddell, Henry George, revised by Sir Henry Stuart Jones Robert Scott, and Roderick McKenzie. Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
Luraghi, Silvia. On the meaning of prepositions and cases: the expression of semantic roles in ancient Greek. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, 2003. DOI: 10.1075/slcs.67
Marmodoro, Anna, editor. The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and Their Manifestations. New York: Routledge, 2010. DOI: 10.4324/9780203851289
Marshall, Mason. “The Possibility Requirement in Plato’s Republic”. Ancient Philosophy 28, number 1 (2008): 71–85. DOI: 10.5840/ancientphil20082814
Martinez, Joel A. “Rethinking Plato’s Conception of Knowledge: The Non-philosopher and the Forms”. Apeiron 44, number 4 (2011): 326–334. DOI: 10.1515/apeiron.2011.019
Molnar, George. Powers. Edited by Stephen Mumford. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Plato. Platonis Rempublicam. Edited by S. R. Slings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Reeve, C. D. C. Blindness and reorientation : problems in Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199934430.001.0001
Reeve, C. D. C. Republic. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2004.
Riddell, James. The Apology of Plato, with a Revised Text and English Notes, and a Digest of Platonic Idioms. Oxford: Clarendon Press ; Oxford University Press, 1867.
Robinson, T. M. Cosmos as Art Object. Binghampton, NY: Global Academic Publishing, 2004.
Rowe, Christopher. Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Sansone, David. “On Hendiadys in Greek”. Glotta 62, nos. 1./2. (1984): 16–25.
Santas, Gerasimos. “Hintikka on Knowledge and its Objects in Plato”. In Patterns in Plato’s Thought, edited by J. M. E.
Moravcsik, 36–42. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1973.
Scaltsas, Theodore. “Knowledge as ‘True Belief Plus Individuation’ in Plato”. Topoi 31, number 2 (2012): 137–149.
Smith, Nicholas D. “Plato on Knowledge as a Power”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 38, number 2 (April 2000): 145–168.
Smith, Nicholas D. “Plato on the Power of Ignorance”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy Supplementary Volume (2012): 51–73.
Smyth, Herbert Weir. Greek Grammar. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1920.
Stokes, Michael C. “Plato and the Sightlovers of the Republic”. Apeiron 25, number 4 (December 1992): 103–132.
Verdenius, W. J. “Epexegesis in Plato”. Mnemosyne 33 (Fourth Series), nos. 3/4 (1980): 351–353.
Vogt, Katja Maria. Belief and Truth: A Skeptic Reading of Plato. Oxford University Press, 2012.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC By 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
