Uso do ambiente aquático para avaliar testes funcionais: viabilidade, benefícios e desafios em comparação com testes realizados em solo

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/

Palavras-chave:

Fisioterapia Aquática, Hidroterapia, Desempenho Físico Funcional, Estudo de Avaliação

Resumo

O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar a
viabilidade, os benefícios e os desafios do uso do ambiente
aquático para avaliar testes funcionais na comparação com
avaliações realizadas em solo. Neste estudo, 40 indivíduos
foram submetidos ao teste de caminhada de seis minutos
(TC6), ao teste de subida de degraus de dois minutos
(TSD2’) e ao teste timed-up-and-go (TUG), tanto em solo
quanto em uma piscina de 1,2 metros de profundidade.
O esforço dos participantes foi medido pela escala de
Borg. Testes t de Student e Cohen d foram usados para
comparar avaliações entre ambientes. Significância foi
estipulada em 5%. Em comparação com o teste em solo, os
participantes caminharam menos na água durante o TC6
(d=3,69, p<0,001) e levaram mais tempo para completar o
TUG (d=2,76, p=0,001). Não foram observadas diferenças
no esforço entre ambientes para o TC6 (p=0,055) e o
TUG (p=0,32). Em relação ao TSD2’, não houve diferença
no número de degraus entre ambientes (p=0,45) e os
participantes experimentaram um menor esforço na água
(d=1,15, p=0,001). Em conclusão, ambientes aquáticos são
uma opção viável para realizar testes funcionais. Embora a
água possa ter aumentado a dificuldade de certos testes,
o esforço na água foi igual ou menor do que em solo

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Oh S, Lee S. Effect of aquatic exercise on physical function and

QOL in individuals with neurological disorder: A systematic

review and meta-analysis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021;27:67-76.

doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.01.009

Most GA. Water and health: a forgotten connection? Perspect

Public Health. 2010;130(5):227-32. doi: 10.1177/1757913910379192

Xu Z, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Lu Y, Wen Y. Efficacy and safety of

aquatic exercise in knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review

and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil.

;37(3):330-347. doi: 10.1177/02692155221134240

Terra de Oliveira R, Lino TB, Scarmagnan GS, Miziara Barbosa

SR, Souza Pegorare ABG, Christofoletti G. Controlled Clinical

Trial on the Effects of Aquatic Exercise on Cognitive Functions

in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Brain Sci. 204;14:703.

doi: 10.3390/brainsci14070703

An J, Lee I, Yi Y. The thermal effects of water immersion on

health outcomes: an integrative review. Int J Environ Res Public

Health. 2019;16(7):1280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071280

Torres-Ronda L, Del Alcázar XS. The properties of water and

their applications for training. J Hum Kinet. 2014;44:237-48.

doi: 10.2478/hukin-2014-0129

Pieniążek M, Mańko G, Spieszny M, Bilski J, Kurzydło W,

et al. Body balance and physiotherapy in the aquatic

environment and at a gym. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:9925802.

doi: 10.1155/2021/9925802 8. Zhu Z, Cui L, Yin M, Yu Y, Zhou X, et al. Hydrotherapy vs.

conventional land-based exercise for improving walking and

balance after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil.

;30(6):587-93. doi: 10.1177/0269215515593392

Teng M, Zhou HJ, Lin L, Lim PH, Yeo D, et al. Cost-effectiveness

of hydrotherapy versus land-based therapy in patients with

musculoskeletal disorders in Singapore. J Public Health (Oxf).

;41(2):391-8. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy044

Curcio A, Temperoni G, Tramontano M, De Angelis S, Iosa

M, et al. The effects of aquatic therapy during post-acute

neurorehabilitation in patients with severe traumatic brain

injury: a preliminary randomized controlled trial. Brain Inj.

;34(12):1630-5. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1825809

Henwood T, Neville C, Baguley C, Beattie E. Aquatic exercise

for residential aged care adults with dementia: benefits and

barriers to participation. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017;29(9):1439-49.

doi: 10.1017/S104161021700028X

Cuesta-Vargas A, Martin-Martin J, Gonzalez-Sanchez M,

Merchan-Baeza JA, Perez-Cruzado D. Identification of Tools

for the Functional and Subjective Assessment of Patients in an

Aquatic Environment: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res

Public Health. 2020;17(16):5690. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165690

Santos DG, Pegoraro ASN, Abrantes CV, Jakaitis F, Gusnman

S, et al. Evaluation of functional mobility of patients with

stroke sequela after treatment in hydrotherapy pool using the

Timed Up and Go Test. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2011;9(3):302-6.

doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082011AO1772

ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary

Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the sixminute

walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):111-7.

doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102

Nogueira MA, Almeida TDN, Andrade GS, Ribeiro AS, Rêgo

AS, et al. Reliability and Accuracy of 2-Minute Step Test in

Active and Sedentary Lean Adults. J Manipulative Physiol Ther.

;44(2):120-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.07.013

Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic

functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc.

;39(2):142-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x

Borg GAV. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci

Sports Exerc. 1982;14:377-81.

Flynn JT, Urbina EM, Brady TM, Baker-Smith C, Daniels SR,

et al. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children and

adolescents: 2022 update: a scientific statement from the

American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2022;79(7):e114-

doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000215

Rojas-Camayo J, Mejia CR, Callacondo D, Dawson JA, Posso M, et

al. Reference values for oxygen saturation from sea level to the

highest human habitation in the Andes in acclimatized persons.

Thorax. 2018;73(8):776-8. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210598

Keys A, Fidanza F, Karvonen MJ, Kimura N, Taylor HL. Indices

of relative weight and obesity. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43(3):655-

doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu058

Cuesta-Vargas A, Hilgenkamp T. Reference Values of Grip

Strength Measured with a Jamar Dynamometer in 1526

Adults with Intellectual Disabilities and Compared to Adults

without Intellectual Disability. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0129585.

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129585

Mänttäri A, Suni J, Sievänen H, Husu P, Vähä-Ypyä H, et al. Sixminute

walk test: a tool for predicting maximal aerobic power

(VO2 max) in healthy adults. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018.

doi: 10.1111/cpf.12525

Stuart AR, Doble J, Presson AP, Kubiak EN. Anatomic landmarks

facilitate predictable partial lower limb loading during

aquatic weight bearing. Curr Orthop Pract. 2015;26(4):414-9.

doi: 10.1097/BCO.0000000000000250

Katsura Y, Yoshikawa T, Ueda SY, Usui T, Sotobayashi D, et al.

Effects of aquatic exercise training using water-resistance

equipment in elderly. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;108(5):957-64.

doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1306-0

Bressel E, Smith G, Miller A, Dolny D. Aquatic-treadmill walking:

quantifying drag force and energy expenditure. J Sport Rehabil.

;21(4):10.1123/jsr.2012.TR5. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2012.TR5

Heywood S, McClelland J, Geigle P, Rahmann A, Clark R.

Spatiotemporal, kinematic, force and muscle activation

outcomes during gait and functional exercise in water compared

to on land: A systematic review. Gait Posture. 2016;48:120-130.

doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.04.033

Jesus SFC, Bassi-Dibai D, Pontes-Silva A, Silva de Araujo A,

Freitas Faria Silva S, et al. Construct validity and reliability of

the 2-Minute Step Test (TME2’) in individuals with low back

pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):1062. doi: 10.1186/

s12891-022-06050-w

Pendergast DR, Moon RE, Krasney JJ, Held HE, Zamparo P.

Human physiology in an aquatic environment. Compr Physiol.

;5(4):1705-50. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c140018

Alberton CL, Nunes GN, Rau DGDS, Bergamin M, Cavalli

AS, et al. Vertical ground reaction force during a waterbased

exercise performed by elderly women: equipment

use effects. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2019;90(4):479-486.

doi: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1620910

Frohman AN, Okuda DT, Beh S, Treadaway K, Mooi C, et al.

Aquatic training in MS: neurotherapeutic impact upon quality

of life. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2015;2(8):864-72. doi: 10.1002/

acn3.220

Ivaniski-Mello A, Casal MZ, Costa RR, Alberton CL, Martinez

FG, Peyré-Tartaruga LA. Quantifying physiological and

biomechanical responses of shallow water walking: a systematic

review and meta-analysis. Res Sports Med. 2023;31(5):604-18.

doi: 10.1080/15438627.2021.2020786

Llano JS, Miranda, HCF, Felippe LA, Andrade LP, Silva TCD,

Christofoletti G. Investigação dos métodos avaliativos

utilizados por fisioterapeutas na especificidade da neurologia

funcional. Fisioter Pesq. 2013;20(1):31-6. doi: 10.1590/

S1809-29502013000100006

Publicado

2025-04-29

Edição

Seção

Pesquisa Original

Como Citar

Uso do ambiente aquático para avaliar testes funcionais: viabilidade, benefícios e desafios em comparação com testes realizados em solo. (2025). Fisioterapia E Pesquisa, 32(cont), e23017024pt. https://doi.org/10.1590/