Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement

Authors

  • Marcelo Lelis Zuppardo Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Pós-graduação em Biopatologia Bucal, Curso de Odontologia - ICT, Disciplina de Periodontia, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1707-0198
  • Milton Santamaria Jr UNIARARAS, Centro Universitário Hermínio Ometto, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ortodontia e Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biomédicas, Araras http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3490-5030
  • Camila Lopes Ferreira Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Pós-graduação em Biopatologia Bucal, Curso de Odontologia - ICT, Disciplina de Periodontia, São José dos Campos, São Paulo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2320-6525
  • Mariéllen Longo Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Curso de Odontologia - ICT, Pos-Doutorado, Disciplina de Periodontia, São José dos Campos, São Paulo http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0487-4728
  • Joni Augusto Cirelli Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Faculdade de Odontologia - FOAR, Disciplina de Periodontia, Araraquara, São Paulo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7082-9290
  • Mauro Pedrine Santamaria Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Curso de Odontologia - ICT, Disciplina de Periodontia, São José dos Campos, São Paulo http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9468-0729
  • Maria Aparecida Neves Jardini Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Curso de Odontologia - ICT, Disciplina de Periodontia, São José dos Campos, São Paulo http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3229-8019

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0766

Keywords:

Corticotomy, Orthodontic movement, Animal study

Abstract

Objective: To compare two corticotomy surgical protocols in rats to verify whether they alter conventional orthodontic movement. Methodology: Sixty Wistar rats were divided into three groups – orthodontic movement (CG), orthodontic movement and corticotomy (G1) and orthodontic movement with corticotomy and decortication (G2) – and euthanized after 7 and 14 days. Tooth movement (mm), bone volume fraction and bone volume ratio to total volume (BV/TV), and bone mineral density (BMD) were evaluated by micro-CT. The total amount of bone was measured in square millimeters and expressed as the percentage of bone area in the histomorphometry. The number of positive TRAP cells and RANK/RANKL/OPG interaction were also investigated. Results: Day 14 showed a statistically significant difference in orthodontic tooth movement in CG compared with G1 (7.52 mm; p=0.009) and G2 (7.36 mm; p=0.016). A micro-CT analysis revealed a difference between CG, G1 and G2 regarding BV/TV, with G1 and G2 presenting a lower BV/TV ratio at 14 days (0.77 and 0.73 respectively); we found no statistically significant differences regarding BMD. There was a difference in the total amount of bone in the CG group between 7 and 14 days. At 14 days, CG presented a significantly higher bone percentage than G1 and G2. Regarding TRAP, G2 had more positive cells at 7 and 14 days compared with CG and G1. Conclusion: Corticotomy accelerates orthodontic movement. Decortication does not improve corticotomy efficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Effect of two corticotomy protocols on periodontal tissue and orthodontic movement. (2021). Journal of Applied Oral Science, 28, e20190766. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0766