Implications of the health information pollution for society, health professionals, and science

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/

Keywords:

Access to information, Disinformation, Information-seeking behavior, Science, Social media

Abstract

In the era of ultra-connectivity, the proliferation of speculative notions driven by personal emotions eclipses the credibility of scientific evidence. This trend has led to an alarming surge in information pollution, particularly by the pervasive influence of social media platforms. Consequently, this overflow of falsehoods poses a significant threat to public health and overall societal well-being. In this sense, this critical review aims to present the harmful impacts of the health information pollution on society, health professionals, and health science, as well as strategies for their mitigation. The management of information pollution requires coordinated efforts to develop and implement multiple effective preventive and debunking strategies, such as the regulation of big tech companies’ actions and algorithm data transparency, the education of health professionals on responsible social media use, and the establishment of a novel academic culture, shifting from the valorization of productivism to socially relevant scientific production. By acknowledging the complexities of this contemporary issue and drawing insights from distinct perspectives, it is possible to safeguard the integrity of information dissemination and foster a more informed and resilient community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

- United Nations Development Programme. Mapping and analysis of efforts to counter information pollution in Europe and Central Asia region [Internet]. New York: United Nations; 2022 [cited 2024 Aug 26]. Available from: https://www.undp.org/eurasia/publications/information-pollution

» https://www.undp.org/eurasia/publications/information-pollution

- Wardle C, Derakhshan H. Information disorder: toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making [Internet]. Strasburg: Council of Europe; 2017 [cited 2024 Aug 26]. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-researc/168076277c

» https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-researc/168076277c

- United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Journalism, 'fake news' & disinformation [Internet]. Paris: UNESCO; 2018 [cited 2024 Aug 26]. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265552

» https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265552

- Douglas KM, Uscinski JE, Sutton RM, Cichocka A, Nefes T, Ang CS, et al. Understanding conspiracy theories. Polit Psychol. 2019;40(S1):3-35. doi: 10.1111/pops.12568

» https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568

- Talwar S, Dhir A, Kaur P, Zafar N, Alrasheedy M. Why do people share fake news? Associations between the dark side of social media use and fake news sharing behavior. J Retail Consum Serv. 2019;72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.026

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.026

- Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e85. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1933

» https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1933

- Lazer DM, Baum MA, Benkler Y, Berinsky AJ, Greenhil KM, Menczer F, et al. The science of fake news: addressing fake news requires a multidisciplinary effort. Science. 2018;359(6380):1094-6. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998

» https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998

- Strieder AP, Aguirre PE, Lotto M, Cruvinel AF, Cruvinel T. Digital behavior surveillance for monitoring the interests of Google users in amber necklace in different countries. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019;29(5):603-14. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12500

» https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12500

- Lotto M, Menezes TS, Hussain IZ, Tsao SF, Butt ZA, Morita PP, et al. Characterization of false or misleading fluoride content on Instagram: infodemiology study. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(5):e37519. doi: 10.2196/37519

» https://doi.org/10.2196/37519

- Harper CA, Satchell LP, Fido D, Latzman RD. Functional fear predicts public health compliance in the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2021;19(5):1875-88. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00281-5

» https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00281-5

- Granovetter MS. The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol. 1973;78(6):1360-80.

- Guess A, Nagler J, Tucker J. Less than you think: prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Sci Adv. 2019;5(1):eaau4586. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau4586

» https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586

- van der Linden S. Misinformation: Susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public. Nat Med. 2022;28(3):460-7. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6

» https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6

- McIntyre L. Post-truth. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2018.

- Stokes B, Wike R, Carle J. Global concern about climate change, broad support for limiting emissions [Internet]. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2015 [2024 Aug 26]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2015/11/05/global-concern-about-climate-change-broad-support-for-limiting-emissions/

» https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2015/11/05/global-concern-about-climate-change-broad-support-for-limiting-emissions/

- Foucault M. Hermeneutics of the subject. New York: Picador; 2005.

- Jia X, Pang Y, Liu LS. Online health information seeking behavior: a systematic review. Healthcare. 2021;9(12):1740. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121740

» https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9121740

- Lotto M, Jorge OS, Cruvinel T. Digital surveillance: are people actively seeking non-factual fluoride content on Google? Fluoride [Internet]. Forthcoming 2024 [cited 2024 Ag 26]. Available from: https://www.fluorideresearch.online/epub/files/267.pdf

» https://www.fluorideresearch.online/epub/files/267.pdf

- Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S. The spread of true and false news online. Science. 2018;359(6380):1146-51. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559

» https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559

- Vilmer JB, Escorcia A, Guilaume M, Herrera J. Information manipulation: a challenge for our democracies [Internet]. Paris: Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs and Ministry for the Armed Forces; 2018 [cited 2024 Aug 24]. Available from: https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/information_manipulation_rvb_cle838736.pdf

» https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/information_manipulation_rvb_cle838736.pdf

- Lotto M, Hussain IZ, Kaur J, Butt ZA, Cruvinel T, Morita PP. Analysis of fluoride-free content on Twitter: topic modeling study. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e44586. doi: 10.2196/44586

» https://doi.org/10.2196/44586

- Sharon AJ, Baram-Tsabari A. Can science literacy help individuals identify misinformation in everyday life? Sci Educ. 2020;104:873-94. doi: 10.1002/sce.21581

» https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21581

- Jones-Jang SM, Mortensen T, Liu J. Does media literacy help identification of fake news? Information literacy helps, but other literacies don't. Am Behav Sci. 2021;65(2):371-88. doi: 10.1177/000276421986940

» https://doi.org/10.1177/000276421986940

- Nascimento IJ, Pizarro AB, Almeida JM, Azzopardi-Muscat N, Golçalves MA, Björklund M, et al. Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews. Bull World Health Organ. 2022;100(9):544-61. doi: 10.2471/BLT.21.287654

» https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.21.287654

- Ecker UKH, Lewandowsky S, Cook J, Schmid P, Fazio LK, Brashier N, et al. The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nat Rev Psychol. 2022;1:13-29. doi: 10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y

» https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021-00006-y

- Skafle I, Nordahl-Hansen A, Quintana DS, Wynn R, Gabarron E. Misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines on social media: Rapid review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(8):e37367. doi: 10.2196/37367

» https://doi.org/10.2196/37367

- Mathes BM, Norr AM, Allan NP, Albanese BJ, Schmidt NB. Cyberchondria: overlap with health anxiety and unique relations with impairment, quality of life, and service utilization. Psychiatry Res. 2018;261:204-11. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.002

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.01.002

- Bianchi FP, Tafuri S. Spreading of misinformation on mass media and digital platforms regarding vaccines: a systematic scoping review on stakeholders, policymakers, and sentiments/behavior of Italian consumers. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023;19(2):2259398. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2259398

» https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2023.2259398

- Wonneberger A, Meijers MH, Schuck AR. Shifting public engagement: how media coverage of climate change conferences affects climate change audience segments. Public Underst Sci. 2020;29(2):176-93. doi: 10.1177/0963662519886474

» https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519886474

- Fleerackers A, Riedlinger M, Moorhead L, Ahmed R, Alperin JP. Communicating scientific uncertainty in an age of COVID-19: an investigation into the use of preprints by digital media outlets. Health Commun. 2022;37(6):726-38. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1864892

» https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1864892

- McLaren L, Patterson SK, Faris P, Chen G, Thawer S, Figueiredo R, et al. Fluoridation cessation and oral health equity: a 7-year post-cessation study of Grade 2 schoolchildren in Alberta, Canada. Can J Public Health. 2022;113(6):955-68. doi: 10.17269/s41997-022-00654-4

» https://doi.org/10.17269/s41997-022-00654-4

- Fernandez M, Bellogín A, Cantador I. Analysing the effect of recommendation algorithms on the spread of misinformation. In: Aiello LC, Mejova Y, Seneviratne O, Sun J, Kaiser S, Staab S, editors. WEBSCI '24: Proceedings of the 16th ACM Web Science Conference. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2024. p. 159-69. doi: 10.1145/3614419.3644003

» https://doi.org/10.1145/3614419.3644003

- Alenezi MN, Alqenaei M. Machine learning in detecting COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter. Future Internet. 2021;13(10):244. doi: 10.3390/fi13100244

» https://doi.org/10.3390/fi13100244

- Colomina C, Sánchez Margalef H, Youngs R. The impact of disinformation on democratic processes and human rights in the world [Internet]. Strasbourg: European Parliament; 2021 [cited 2024 Aug 28]. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/653635/EXPO_STU (2021)653635_EN.pdf

» https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/653635/EXPO_STU (2021)653635_EN.pdf

- Doss C, Mondschein J, Shu D, Wolfson T, Kopecky D, Fitton-Kane VA, et al. Deepfakes and scientific knowledge dissemination. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):13429. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39944-3

» https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-39944-3

- Cheng VC, Wong SC, Chuang VW, So SY, Chen JH, Sridhar S, et al. The role of community-wide wearing of face mask for control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic due to SARS-CoV-2. J Infect. 2020;81(1):107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.024

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.024

- Saeedi M, Al-Othman N, Rabayaa M, Dwaikat S. An investigation into religious awareness as a crucial factor in adherence to COVID-19 medical directives in Palestine. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1336. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13767-9

» https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13767-9

- Barros JAC. [Pensando o processo saúde doença: a que responde o modelo biomédico?] Considering the health-diesease process: What does the biomedical model answer to? Saude Soc. 2002;11(1):67-84. Portuguese. doi: 10.1590/S0104-12902002000100008

» https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902002000100008

- Cilliers EJ. The challenge of teaching Generation Z. People Int J Soc Sci. 2017;3(1):188-98. doi: 10.20319/pijss.2017.31.188198

» https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2017.31.188198

- Saxena M, Mishra DK. Gamification and Gen Z in higher education: a systematic review of literature. Int J Inf Educ Technol. 2021;17(4):1-22. doi: 10.4018/IJICTE.20211001.oa10

» https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.20211001.oa10

- Lee HY, Cheng YP, Wang WS, Lin CJ, Huang YM. Exploring the learning process and effectiveness of STEM education via learning behavior analysis and the interactive-constructive- active-passive framework. J Educ Comput Res. 2023;61(5):951-76. doi: 10.1177/07356331221136888

» https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221136888

- Brown B. Competition in healthcare: a review of international evidence. Perspect Public Health. 2016;136(3):121-2. doi: 10.1177/1757913916638233

» https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913916638233

- Santos CJ Júnior, Misael JR, Trindade EM Filho, Wyszomirska RM, Santos AA, Costa PJ. [Expansão de vagas e qualidade dos cursos de Medicina no Brasil: "Em que pé estamos?"] Expansion of vacancies and quality of medical courses in Brazil: "Where do we stand? Rev Bras Educ Med. 2021;45(2):e058. Portuguese. doi: 10.1590/1981-5271v45.2-20200523

» https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5271v45.2-20200523

- Anjum RL, Copeland S, Rocca E. Complexity, rethinking causality, complexity and evidence for the unique patient. New York: Springer; 2020.

- Ventola. Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. P T. 2014;39(7):491-520.

- Steinert Y, Cruess S, Cruess R, Snell. Faculty development for teaching and evaluating professionalism: From programme design to curriculum change. Med Educ. 2005;39(2):127-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02069.x

» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02069.x

- Jeyaraman M, Ramasubramanian S, Kumar S, Jeyaraman N, Selvaraj P, Nallakumarasamy A, et al. Multifaceted role of social media in healthcare: opportunities, challenges, and the need for quality control. Cureus. 2023;15(5):e39111. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39111

» https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39111

- Kaczmarczyk JM, Chuang A, Dugoff L, Abbott JF, Culimore AJ, Dalrymple J, et al. e-Professionalism: a new frontier in medical education. Teach Learn Med. 2013;25(2):165-70. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2013.770741

» https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2013.770741

- Parker MH, Wardle JL, Wer M, Stewart CL. Medical merchants: conflict of interest, office product sales and notifiable conduct. Med J Aus. 2011;194(1):34-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb04143.x

» https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb04143.x

- Lu L, Liu J, Yuan YC, Burns KS, Lu E, Li D. Source trust and COVID-19 information sharing: the mediating roles of emotions and beliefs about sharing. Health Educ Behav. 2021;48(2):132-9. doi:10.1177/1090198120984760

- Rosman T, Grösser S. Belief updating when confronted with scientific evidence: examining the role of trust in science. Public Underst Sci. 2024;33(3):308-24. doi: 10.1177/09636625231203538

» https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625231203538

- Hansson SO. Science denial as a form of pseudoscience. Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2017;63:39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.05.002

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.05.002

- Chavda VP, Sonak SS, Munshi NK, Dhamade PN. Pseudoscience and fraudulent products for COVID-19 management. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022;29(42):62887-912. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21967-4

» https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21967-4

- Iandoli L, Primario S, Zollo G. The impact of group polarization on the quality of online debate in social media: a systematic literature review. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021;170:120924. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120924

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120924

- Fanelli D, Costas R, Ioannidis JP. Meta-assessment of bias in science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(14):3714-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618569114

» https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618569114

- Morris RD. How denialist amplification spread COVID misinformation and undermined the credibility of public health science. J Public Health Policy. 2024;45(1):114-25. doi: 10.1057/s41271-023-00451-4

» https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-023-00451-4

- Stengers I. Another science is possible: a manifesto for slow science. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2018.

- Glick M. Believing is seeing: confirmation bias. J Am Dent Assoc. 2017;148(3):131-2. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2017.01.009

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2017.01.009

- Juca AM, Jorge OS, Moreira YR, Lotto M, Menezes TS, Cruvinel T. Uncovering a pseudoscience: an analysis of 'biological dentistry' Instagram posts. Acta Odontol Scand. 2024;83:180-9. doi: 10.2340/aos.v83.40486

» https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v83.40486

- Sauvayre R. Dissemination of a "fake miracle cure" against COVID-19 on Twitter: the case of chlorine dioxide. Soc Sci. 2023;12(6):320. doi: 10.3390/socsci12060320

» https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12060320

- Hotez PJ. Will anti-vaccine activism in the USA reverse global goals? Nat Rev Immunol. 2022;22(9):525-6. doi: 10.1038/s41577-022-00770-9

» https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-022-00770-9

- Marginalia Science. Marginalised ideas are key to scientific progress. Nat Hum Behav. 2019;3(10):1024. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0699-y

» https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0699-y

- Menezes TD, Martini MM, Lotto M, Jucá AM, Jorge OS, Cruvinel A, et al. Untangling the truth: user engagement with misinformation in toothache-related Facebook posts. Community Dent Health. 2024;41(2):128-33. doi: 10.1922/CDH_00190Menezes06

» https://doi.org/10.1922/CDH_00190Menezes06

- Collyer TA. 'Salami slicing' helps careers but harms science. Nat Hum Behav. 2019;3(10):1005-6. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-06877-2

» https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-06877-2

- Popper K. Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach. Oxford: OUP Oxford; 1972.

- Kojaku S, Livan G, Masuda N. Detecting anomalous citation groups in journal networks. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):14524. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93572-3

» https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93572-3

- Retraction Watch. Papers and peer reviews with evidence of ChatGPT writing [Internet]. New York: Retraction Watch; 2024 [cited 2024 May 15] Available from: https://retractionwatch.com/papers-and-peer-reviews-with-evidence-of-chatgpt-writing/

» https://retractionwatch.com/papers-and-peer-reviews-with-evidence-of-chatgpt-writing/

- Figueiredo D Filho, Silva L, Medeiros H. "Won't get fooled again": statistical fault detection in COVID-19 Latin American data. Global Health. 2022;18(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00899-1

» https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-022-00899-1

- Gray R, Water A, MacKay B. How prospective trial registration can prevent selective outcome reporting and salami slicing? Women Birth. 2022;35(2):105-7. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.07.007

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2021.07.007

- Alam M, Ratner D, Coleman WP 3rd. How to understand, detect, and avoid plagiarism. Dermatol Surg. 2019;45(5):631-7. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001927

» https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000001927

- Esposito M. Editorial: The scientific plague affecting medical and dental research: from fake news to fake studies. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10(2):119-20.

- Schünemann H, Brozek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editors. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations [Internet]. Updated October 2013. [place unknown]: The GRADE Working Group; 2013 [cited 2024 Aug 28]. Available from: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html

» https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html

- Wilhite A, Fong EA, Wilhite S. The influence of editorial decisions and the academic network on self-citations and journal impact factors. Res Policy. 2019;48(6):1513-22. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.003

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.003

- Dance A. Stop the peer-review treadmill. I want to get off. Nature. 2023;614(7948):581-3. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00403-8

» https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00403-8

- D'Andrea R, O'Dwyer JP. Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers? PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186111

» https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186111

- Siler K, Vincent-Lamarre P, Sugimoto CR, Larivière V. Predatory publishers' latest scam: bootlegged and rebranded papers. Nature. 2021;598(7882):563-5. doi: 10.1038/d41586-021-02906-8

» https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02906-8

- Clemons M, Silva MC, Joy AA, Cobey KD, Mazzarello S, Stober C, et al. Predatory Invitations from journals: more than just a nuisance? Oncologist. 2017;22(2):236-40. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0371

» https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0371

- Else H. Multimillion-dollar trade in paper authorships alarms publishers. Nature. 2023;613(7945):617-8. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00062-9

» https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00062-9

- Lotto M, Strieder AP, Aguirre PE, Oliveira TM, Machado MA Rios D, et al. Parental-oriented educational mobile messages to aid in the control of early childhood caries in low socioeconomic children: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent. 2020;101:103456. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103456

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103456

- Morita MC, UriarteM Neto, Fontanella VR, Haddad AE. The unplanned and unequal expansion of Dentistry courses in Brazil from 1856 to 2020. Braz Oral Res. 2020;35:e009. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0009

» https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0009

- Weatherall JO, O'Connor C. The misinformation age: how false beliefs spread. Yale: Yale University Press; 2019.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-22

Issue

Section

Review

How to Cite

Lotto, M., Jorge, O. S., Cruvinel, A., & Cruvinel, T. (2024). Implications of the health information pollution for society, health professionals, and science. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 32, e20240222. https://doi.org/10.1590/