Biomimetic Restorative Dentistry
an evidence-based discussion of common myths
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/Keywords:
Adhesive dentistry, Restorative dentistry, Biomimetic restorations, Evidence-based dentistry, Evidence-based practice, In vitro, Randomized controlled trial, Research designAbstract
This narrative review critically examines some protocols of biomimetic restorative dentistry (BRD), which supposedly outperforms traditional adhesive techniques. This review explores the origins of BRD, introduces cognitive biases influencing the adoption of BRD protocols without evidence scrutiny, and discusses nine BRD protocols. For this, we searched randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews in the literature on the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library CENTRAL databases, which lead to the following conclusions about the revised protocols: 1) The use of dyes excessively removes carious dentin; 2) Aluminum oxide air abrasion contributes to overtreatment and may pose long-term health risks to dental professionals; 3) Beveling enamel in posterior teeth is technically difficult and leads to unnecessary loss of adjacent sound enamel with no evidence of its use outperforming butt-joint preparations; 4) Deactivating matrix metalloproteinases with chlorhexidine shows no clinical evidence of improving restoration longevity. 5) “Elected“ gold-standard adhesive systems perform no better than other good performing available systems; 6) Immediate dentin sealing and resin coating result in similar post-operative sensitivity and longevity of indirect fillings as delayed dentin sealing; 7) Deep margin elevation is a viable alternative to manage subgingival margins in occlusoproximal cavities; 8) The process of “decoupling” with time lacks scientific evidence to support its use; 9) Placing fiber inserts on the pulpal floor and/or axial wall to minimize stress offers no benefits over current alternatives. In conclusion, more rigorous research is needed to validate BRD protocols, focusing on important clinical outcomes that impact in the longevity of the restoration, such as fracture, debonding, post-operative sensitivity, esthetic quality, presence of caries lesions adjacent to restorations and patients’ satisfaction need to be thoroughly investigated. Reliance on anecdotal evidence, clinical experience, and common sense propagates myths and undervalues the need for a critical approach in evaluating dental techniques.
Downloads
References
- Magne PB. U Biomimetic restorative dentistry. Illinois: Quintessence; 2022.
- Deliperi S, Alleman D, Rudo D. Stress-reduced direct composites for the restoration of structurally compromised teeth: fiber design according to the "Wallpapering" technique. Oper Dent. 2017;42(3):233-43. doi: 10.2341/15-289-t
» https://doi.org/10.2341/15-289-t
- Alleman D, Nejad M, Alleman C. The protocols of biomimetic restorative dentistry: 2002 to 2017. Inside Dentistry. 2017;13(6):64-73.
- Magne P, Belser U. Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition: a biomimetic approach. Illinois: Quintessence; 2002.
- Bazos P, Magne P. Bio-Emulation: biomimetically emulating nature utilizing a histoanatomic approach; visual synthesis. Int J Esthet Dent. 2014;9(3):330-52.
- Bazos P, Magne P. Bio-emulation: biomimetically emulating nature utilizing a histo-anatomic approach; structural analysis. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2011;6(1):8-19.
- Lima AF, Watts DC. Upholding scientific integrity in dental materials adoption. Dent Mater. 2024;40(5):765-66. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2024.03.005
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2024.03.005
- Morrison KR, Matthes J. Socially motivated projection: need to belong increases perceived opinion consensus on important issues. Eur J Social Psychol. 2011;41(6):707-19. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.797
» https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.797
- Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Straus and Giroux; 2011.
- Bauer J, Spackman S, Chiappelli F, Prolo P. Evidence-based decision making in dental practice. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2005;5(3):125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2005.06.001
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2005.06.001
- Nickerson RS. Confirmation Bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of general psychology. 1998;2(2):175-220. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
» https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
- Tversky A, Kahneman D. Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology. 1973;5(2):207-32. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
» https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
- Karlsson N, Loewenstein G, Seppi D. The ostrich effect: selective attention to information. J Risk Uncertain. 2009;38:95-115. doi: 10.1007/s11166-009-9060-6
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-009-9060-6
- Milgram S. Behavioral study of obedience. J Abnorm Psychol. 1963;67(4):371-8. doi: 10.1037/h0040525
» https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525
- Cialdini RB. Influence: the psychology of persuasion, revised edition. New York: Harper Bussiness; 2021.
- Newell BR, Shanks DR. Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2014;37(1):1-19. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12003214
» https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12003214
- Hovland CI, Janis IL, Kelley HH. Communication and persuasion: psychological studies of opinion change; New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1953.
- Kunda Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psycholl Bull. 1990;108(3):480-98. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
» https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
- Guyatt GH, Rennie D, Meade MO, Cook DJ. Users' guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill Professional; 2014.
- Murad MH, Asi N, Alsawas M, Alahdab F. New evidence pyramid. Evid Based Med. 2016;21(4):125-7. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401.
» https://doi.org/10.1136/ebmed-2016-110401
- Jokstad A. Dentists and new digital appliances - to buy or delay until the next model? Clin Exp Dent Res. 2016;2(3):177-78. doi: 10.1002/cre2.56.
» https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.56
- Tellez M, Kinner DG, Heimberg RG, Lim S, Ismail AI. Prevalence and correlates of dental anxiety in patients seeking dental care. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2015;43(2):135-42. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12132
» https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12132
- Alleman DS, Magne P. A systematic approach to deep caries removal end points: the peripheral seal concept in adhesive dentistry. Quintessence Int. 2012;43(3):197-208.
- Schwendicke F, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L, Maltz M, Manton DJ, Ricketts D, et al. Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on carious tissue removal. Adv Dent Res. 2016;28(2):58-67. doi: 10.1177/0022034516639271.
» https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516639271
- Fusayama T. New concepts in operative dentistry: differentiating two layers of carious denitin and using an adhesive resin. Michigan: Quintessense Books; 1980.
- Yip HK, Stevenson AG, Beeley JA. The specificity of caries detector dyes in cavity preparation. Br Dent J. 1994;176(11):417-21. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808470.
» https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808470
- McComb D. Caries-detector dyes--how accurate and useful are they? J Can Dent Assoc. 2000;66(4):195-8.
- Hosoya Y, Taguchi T, Arita S, Tay FR. Clinical evaluation of polypropylene glycol-based caries detecting dyes for primary and permanent carious dentin. J Dent. 2008;36(12):1041-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.08.010
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.08.010
- Bjørndal L, Simon S, Tomson PL, Duncan HF. Management of deep caries and the exposed pulp. Int Endod J. 2019;52(7):949-73. doi: 10.1111/iej.13128
» https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13128
- Figundio N, Lopes P, Tedesco TK, Fernandes JC, Fernandes GV, Mello-Moura AC. Deep carious lesions management with stepwise, selective, or non-Selective removal in permanent dentition: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. In: Healthcare (Basel) 2023;11(16):2338. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162338
» https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11162338
- Peumans M, Politano G, Van Meerbeek B. Effective protocol for daily high-quality direct posterior composite restorations. Cavity preparation and design. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(6):581-96. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a45515
» https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a45515
- Isolan CP, Sarkis-Onofre R, Lima GS, Moraes RR. Bonding to sound and caries-affected dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(1):7-18. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a39775
» https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a39775
- Schwendicke F, Paris S, Tu YK. Effects of using different criteria for caries removal: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.004
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.10.004
- Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Failure rate of high-viscosity GIC based ART compared with that of conventional amalgam restorations-evidence from an update of a systematic review. SADJ. 2012;67(7):329-31.
- Amorim RG, Frencken JE, Raggio DP, Chen X, Hu X, Leal SC. Survival percentages of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) restorations and sealants in posterior teeth: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(8):2703-25. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2625-5
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2625-5
- Huang CT, Kim J, Arce C, Lawson NC. Intraoral air abrasion: a review of devices, materials, evidence, and clinical applications in restorative dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2019;40(8):508-13; quiz 14.
- Almeida G, Marques JA, Van Meerbeek B, Ramos JC, Falacho RI. Particle abrasion as a pre-bonding dentin surface treatment: a scoping review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024;36(5):746-60. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13183
» https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13183
- Lima VP, Soares K, Caldeira VS, Faria ES, Loomans B, Moraes RR. Airborne-particle abrasion and dentin bonding: systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Dent. 2021;46(1):E21-e33. doi: 10.2341/19-216-l
» https://doi.org/10.2341/19-216-l
- Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos. RBR-4hbcn6z Technique for improving the retention of composite Resin Restorations in non-carious cervical lesions [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: REBEC; 2023 [cited 2024 Sept 2]. Available from: https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-4hbcn6z
» https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-4hbcn6z
- Anusavice K, Shen C, Rawls H. Phillips' science of dental materials.. St. Louis, Missouri Elsevier; 2013.
- Bühler J, Amato M, Weiger R, Walter C. A systematic review on the effects of air polishing devices on oral tissues. Int J Dent Hyg. 2016;14(1):15-28. doi: 10.1111/idh.12120
» https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12120
- Dekali S, Bourgois A, François S. Critical review on toxicological mechanisms triggered by inhalation of alumina nanoparticles on to the lungs. Biomedicines. 2022;10(10):2664. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10102664
» https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102664
- Opdam NJ, Roeters JJ, Kuijs R, Burgersdijk RC. Necessity of bevels for box only Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(3):274-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70127-1
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70127-1
- Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effects of regional enamel and prism orientation on resin bonding. Oper Dent. 2003;28(1):20-7.
- Carvalho RM, Santiago SL, Fernandes CA, Suh BI, Pashley DH. Effects of prism orientation on tensile strength of enamel. J Adhes Dent. 2000;2(4):251-7.
- Ben-Amar A, Metzger Z, Gontar G. Cavity design for class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1987;58(1):5-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(87)80133-6
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(87)80133-6
- Moore DH, Vann WF Jr. The effect of a cavosurface bevel on microleakage in posterior composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;59(1):21-4. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(88)90100-x
» https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90100-x
- Hoelscher DC, Gregory WA, Linger JB, Pink FE. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent. 2000;13(4):171-5.
- Saunders WP, Grieve AR, Russell EM, Alani AH. The effects of dentine bonding agents on marginal leakage of composite restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 1990;17(6):519-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1990.tb01423.x
» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1990.tb01423.x
- Heintze SD. Clinical relevance of tests on bond strength, microleakage and marginal adaptation. Dent Mater. 2013;29(1):59-84. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.158
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.158
- Isenberg BP, Leinfelder KF. Efficacy of beveling posterior composite resin preparations. J Esthet Dent. 1990;2(3):70-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1990.tb00612.x
» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1990.tb00612.x
- Wilson NH, Lynch CD. The teaching of posterior resin composites: planning for the future based on 25 years of research. J Dent. 2014;42(5):503-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.014
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.014
- Lynch CD, Frazier KB, McConnell RJ, Blum IR, Wilson NH. State-of-the-art techniques in operative dentistry: contemporary teaching of posterior composites in UK and Irish dental schools. Br Dent J. 2010;209(3):129-36. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.674
» https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.674
- Wang C, Xu J, Xu J, Deng S, Fu B, Zhang L. Effect of the prism-interprisms three-dimension spatial microstructure on the enamel bond strength. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):855. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03599-3
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03599-3
- Apel Z, Vafaeian B, Apel DB, Hussain A. Occlusal stresses in beveled versus non-beveled tooth preparation. Biom Eng Adv. 2021;2:100010. doi: 10.1016/j.bea.2021.100010
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bea.2021.100010
- Soliman S, Preidl R, Karl S, Hofmann N, Krastl G, Klaiber B. Influence of cavity margin design and restorative material on marginal quality and seal of extended class II resin composite restorations in vitro. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(1):7-16. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a35520
» https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a35520
- Coelho-De-Souza FH, Camargo JC, Beskow T, Balestrin MD, Klein-Júnior CA, Demarco FF. A randomized double-blind clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 1-year follow-up. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20(2):174-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572012000200009
» https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-77572012000200009
- Montagner AF, Sarkis-Onofre R, Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS. MMP Inhibitors on dentin stability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014;93(8):733-43. doi: 10.1177/0022034514538046
» https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514538046
-Kiuru O, Sinervo J, Vähänikkilä H, Anttonen V, Tjäderhane L. MMP inhibitors and dentin bonding: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Dent. 2021;2021:9949699. doi: 10.1155/2021/9949699
» https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9949699
- Perdigão J, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Dentin adhesion and MMPs: a comprehensive review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2013;25(4):219-41. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12016
» https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12016
- Loguercio AD, Hass V, Gutierrez MF, Luque-Martinez IV, Szezs A, Stanislawczuk R, et al. Five-year effects of chlorhexidine on the in vitro durability of resin/dentin interfaces. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(1):35-42. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a35514
» https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a35514
- Breschi L, Maravic T, Comba A, Cunha SR, Loguercio AD, Reis A, et al. Chlorhexidine preserves the hybrid layer in vitro after 10-years aging. Dent Mater. 2020;36(5):672-80. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.03.009
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.03.009
- Carrilho MR, Geraldeli S, Tay F, Goes MF, Carvalho RM, Tjäderhane L, et al. In vivo preservation of the hybrid layer by chlorhexidine. J Dent Res. 2007;86(6):529-33. doi: 10.1177/154405910708600608
» https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910708600608
- Hebling J, Pashley DH, Tjäderhane L, Tay FR. Chlorhexidine arrests subclinical degradation of dentin hybrid layers in vivo. J Dent Res. 2005;84(8):741-6. doi: 10.1177/154405910508400811
» https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400811
- Pannuti CM, Sendyk DI, Graças YT, Takai SL, Sabóia VP, Romito GA, et al. Clinically relevant outcomes in dental clinical trials: challenges and proposals. Braz Oral Res. 2020;34 Suppl 2:e073. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0073
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0073
- Heintze SD, Rousson V, Mahn E. Bond strength tests of dental adhesive systems and their correlation with clinical results: a meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2015;31(4):423-34. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.011
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.011
- Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e100-21. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.148
- Araújo MS, Souza LC, Apolonio FM, Barros LO, Reis A, Loguercio AD, et al. Two-year clinical evaluation of chlorhexidine incorporation in two-step self-etch adhesive. J Dent. 2015;43(1):140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.010
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.07.010
- Favetti M, Schroeder T, Montagner AF, Correa MB, Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS. Effectiveness of pre-treatment with chlorhexidine in restoration retention: a 36-month follow-up randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2017;60:44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.014
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.014
- Sartori N, Stolf SC, Silva SB, Lopes GC, Carrilho M. Influence of chlorhexidine digluconate on the clinical performance of adhesive restorations: a 3-year follow-up. J Dent. 2013;41(12):1188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.09.004
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.09.004
- Josic U, D'Alessandro C, Miletic V, Maravic T, Mazzitelli C, Jacimovic J, et al. Clinical longevity of direct and indirect posterior resin composite restorations: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2023;39(12):1085-94. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2023.10.009
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.10.009
- Maske TT, Kuper NK, Cenci MS, Huysmans M. Chlorhexidine, a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor and the development of secondary caries wall lesions in a microcosm biofilm model. Caries Res. 2019;53(1):107-17. doi: 10.1159/000490195
» https://doi.org/10.1159/000490195
- Maske TT, Kuper NK, Hollanders AC, Bronkhorst EM, Cenci MS, Huysmans M. Secondary caries development and the role of a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor: a clinical in situ study. J Dent. 2018;71:49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2018.01.011
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2018.01.011
- Pedrazzi V, Figueiredo FA, Adami LE, Furlaneto F, Palioto DB, Messora MR. Surrogate endpoints: when to use and when not to use? A critical appraisal of current evidences. Braz Oral Res. 2020;34 Suppl 2:e074. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0074
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0074
- Reis A, Loguercio AD, Favoreto M, Chibinski AC. Some myths in dentin bonding: an evidence-based perspective. J Dent Res. 2023;102(4):376-82. doi: 10.1177/00220345221146714
» https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345221146714
- Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M. From Buonocore's pioneering acid-etch technique to self-adhering restoratives. a status perspective of rapidly advancing dental adhesive technology. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(1):7-34. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a43994.
» https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a43994
- Peumans M, De Munck J, Mine A, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review. Dent Mater. 2014;30(10):1089-103. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.007
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.07.007
- Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005;21(9):864-81. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003
- De Munck J, Mine A, Poitevin A, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Van Landuyt KL, et al. Meta-analytical review of parameters involved in dentin bonding. J Dent Res. 2012;91(4):351-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034511431251
» https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511431251
- Dreweck F, Burey A, Dreweck MO, Fernandez E, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Challenging the concept that OptiBond FL and Clearfil SE Bond in NCCLs are gold standard adhesives: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oper Dent. 2021;46(6):E276-95. doi: 10.2341/20-059-lit
» https://doi.org/10.2341/20-059-lit
- Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Effect of resin-coating technique on dentin tensile bond strengths over 3 years. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2002;14(2):115-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00160.x
» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00160.x
- Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2005;17(3):144-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00103.x
» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00103.x
- Ozer F, Batu Eken Z, Hao J, Tuloglu N, Blatz MB. Effect of immediate dentin sealing on the bonding performance of indirect restorations: a systematic review. Biomimetics (Basel). 2024;9(3):182. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics9030182
» https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9030182
- Feitosa VP, Medina AD, Puppin-Rontani RM, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA. Effect of resin coat technique on bond strength of indirect restorations after thermal and load cycling. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2010;51(3):111-8. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.51.111
» https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.51.111
- Elbishari H, Elsubeihi ES, Alkhoujah T, Elsubeihi HE. Substantial in-vitro and emerging clinical evidence supporting immediate dentin sealing. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2021;57:101-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.05.004
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.05.004
- Kitayama S, Nasser NA, Pilecki P, Wilson RF, Nikaido T, Tagami J, et al. Effect of resin coating and occlusal loading on microleakage of Class II computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing fabricated ceramic restorations: a confocal microscopic study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2011;69(3):182-92. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2010.549504
» https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2010.549504
- Kolanko J, Bonsor S. Does immediate dentine sealing improve bonding effectiveness of glass ceramic restorations compared to delayed dentine sealing? Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2022;30(2):65-75. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2299Kolanko11
» https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2299Kolanko11
- Gresnigt MM, Cune MS, Schuitemaker J, van der Made SAM, Meisberger EW, Magne P, et al. Performance of ceramic laminate veneers with immediate dentine sealing: an 11 year prospective clinical trial. Dent Mater. 2019;35(7):1042-52. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2019.04.008
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.04.008
- van den Breemer CR, Cune MS, Özcan M, Naves LZ, Kerdijk W, Gresnigt MM. Randomized clinical trial on the survival of lithium disilicate posterior partial restorations bonded using immediate or delayed dentin sealing after 3 years of function. J Dent. 2019;85:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.02.001
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.02.001
- van den Breemer C, Gresnigt M, Özcan M, Kerdijk W, Cune MS. Prospective randomized clinical trial on the survival of lithium disilicate posterior partial crowns bonded using immediate or delayed dentin sealing: short-term results on tooth sensitivity and patient satisfaction. Oper Dent. 2019;44(5):E212-22. doi: 10.2341/18-047-c
» https://doi.org/10.2341/18-047-c
- Alghauli MA, Alqutaibi AY, Borzangy S. Clinical benefits of immediate dentin sealing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. Forthcoming 2024 [cited 2024 Aug 30]. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.014. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.014
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.014
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.014
- Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent. 1997;25(6):435-40. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00063-2
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(96)00063-2
- Reis A, Carrilho M, Breschi L, Loguercio AD. Overview of clinical alternatives to minimize the degradation of the resin-dentin bonds. Oper Dent. 2013;38(4):E1-25. doi: 10.2341/12-258-lit
» https://doi.org/10.2341/12-258-lit
- Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Smale I. A radiographic and scanning electron microscopic study of approximal margins of Class II resin composite restorations placed in vivo. J Dent. 1998;26(4):319-27. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(97)00024-9
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-5712(97)00024-9
- Cavalheiro CP, Scherer H, Imparato JCP, Collares FM, Lenzi TL. Use of flowable resin composite as an intermediate layer in class II restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(10):5629-39. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04090-5
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04090-5
- Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Current clinical concepts for adhesive cementation of tooth-colored posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1998;10(1):47-54.
- Magne P, Spreafico RC. Deep margin elevation: a paradigm shift. Am J Esthet Dent. 2012;2(2):86-96.
- Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M. 3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities. Am J Dent. 2003;16(1):33-6.
- Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities. J Dent. 2007;35(2):124-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.06.003
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.06.003
- Samartzi TK, Papalexopoulos D, Ntovas P, Rahiotis C, Blatz MB. Deep margin elevation: a literature review. Dent J (Basel). 2022;10(3):48. doi: 10.3390/dj10030048
» https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10030048
- McLean JW, Powis DR, Prosser HJ, Wilson AD. The use of glass-ionomer cements in bonding composite resins to dentine. Br Dent J. 1985;158(11):410-4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4805621
» https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805621
- Dablanca-Blanco AB, Blanco-Carrión J, Martín-Biedma B, Varela-Patiño P, Bello-Castro A, Castelo-Baz P. Management of large class II lesions in molars: how to restore and when to perform surgical crown lengthening? Restor Dent Endod. 2017;42(3):240-52. doi: 10.5395/rde.2017.42.3.240.
» https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2017.42.3.240
- Ghezzi C, Brambilla G, Conti A, Dosoli R, Ceroni F, Ferrantino L. Cervical margin relocation: case series and new classification system. Int J Esthet Dent. 2019;14(3):272-84.
- Ferrari M, Koken S, Grandini S, Ferrari CagidiacoE, Joda T, Discepoli N. Influence of cervical margin relocation (CMR) on periodontal health: 12-month results of a controlled trial. J Dent. 2018;69:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.10.008.
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.10.008
- Chun EP, Andrade GS, Grassi ED, Garaicoa J, Garaicoa-Pazmino C. Impact of deep margin elevation procedures upon periodontal parameters: a systematic review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2023;31(1):10-21. doi: 10.1922/EJPRD_2350Chun12
- Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW, Kieri C. Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years. Am J Dent. 2004;17(1):43-50.
- Bresser RA, Gerdolle D, van den Heijkant IA, Sluiter-Pouwels LM, Cune MS, Gresnigt MM. Up to 12 years clinical evaluation of 197 partial indirect restorations with deep margin elevation in the posterior region. J Dent. 2019;91:103227. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103227
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103227
- El-Ma'aita AM, Radwan H, Al-Rabab'ah MA. Deep Margin Elevation - A Retrospective Clinical Study. J Adhes Dent. 2024;26(1):117-24. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b5199089
» https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b5199089
- Farouk AT, Hassanein OES, Fahmy OI, Elkady AM, ElNahass H. Biological evaluation of indirect restorations in endodontically treated posterior teeth with deeply located proximal margins following deep margin elevation versus surgical crown lengthening: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;28(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05434-z
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05434-z
- Gözetici-Çil B, Öztürk-Bozkurt F, Genç-Çaliskan G, Yilmaz B, Aksaka N, Özcan M. Clinical performance of posterior indirect resin composite restorations with the proximal box elevation technique: a prospective clinical trial up to 3 years. J Adhes Dent. 2024;26(1):19-30. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.b4908449
» https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b4908449
- Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Loomans BA, Huysmans MC. 12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations. J Dent Res. 2010;89(10):1063-7. doi: 10.1177/0022034510376071
» https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510376071
- Rodolpho PA, Rodolfo B, Collares K, Correa MB, Demarco FF, Opdam NJ, et al. Clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations after up to 33 years. Dent Mater. 2022;38(4):680-88. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.02.009
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.02.009
- Veiga AM, Cunha AC, Ferreira DM, Fidalgo TK, Chianca TK, Reis KR, et al. Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;54:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.003
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.003
- Spreafico RC, M. Composite resin restoration on posterior teeth. In: Roulet JF, Degrange M, editors. Adhesion: the silent revolution in dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 2000. p. 197-276.
- Montag R, Dietz W, Nietzsche S, Lang T, Weich K, Sigusch BW, et al. Clinical and micromorphologic 29-year results of posterior composite restorations. J Dent Res. 2018;97(13):1431-37. doi: 10.1177/0022034518788798.
» https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034518788798
- van Dijken JW. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up. J Dent. 2010;38(6):469-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.007
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.02.007
- Alleman D, Alleman D, Deliperi S, Diaz J, Martins L, Keulemans F. Decoupling with time [Internet]. Tampa: CDEWorld; 2021 [cited 2024 Aug 30]. Available from: https://cdeworld.com/courses/5303-decoupling-with-time
» https://cdeworld.com/courses/5303-decoupling-with-time
- Irie M, Suzuki K, Watts DC. Marginal gap formation of light-activated restorative materials: effects of immediate setting shrinkage and bond strength. Dent Mater. 2002;18(3):203-10. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00083-5
» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(01)00083-5
- Deliperi S, Bardwell DN. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;133(10):1387-98. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0055
» https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0055
- Wilson NH, Cowan AJ, Unterbrink G, Wilson MA, Crisp RJ. A clinical evaluation of class II composites placed using a decoupling technique. J Adhes Dent. 2000;2(4):319-29.
- Nikolaenko SA, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf M, Petschelt A, Dasch W, Frankenberger R. Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater. 2004;20(6):579-85. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2003.08.001
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.08.001
- Magne P, Boff LL, Oderich E, Cardoso AC. Computer-aided-design/computer-assisted-manufactured adhesive restoration of molars with a compromised cusp: effect of fiber-reinforced immediate dentin sealing and cusp overlap on fatigue strength. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012;24(2):135-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00433.x
» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00433.x
- Albar N, Khayat W. Fracture load of mesio-occluso-distal composite restorations performed with different reinforcement techniques: an in vitro study. Polymers (Basel). 2023;15(6):1358. doi: 10.3390/polym15061358
» https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15061358
- Sadr A, Bakhtiari B, Hayashi J, Luong MN, Chen YW, Chyz G, et al. Effects of fiber reinforcement on adaptation and bond strength of a bulk-fill composite in deep preparations. Dent Mater. 2020;36(4):527-34. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.007
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.007
- Salem MN, Hassanein OE, ElKassas DW, Shaalan OO. 12-months clinical evaluation of fiber reinforced bulk fill resin composite versus incremental packing of nanohybrid resin composite in restoration of deep proximal lesions of permanent molars: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2022;56(3):267-80. doi: 10.15644/asc56/3/5
» https://doi.org/10.15644/asc56/3/5
- Guney T, Yazici AR. 24-month clinical evaluation of different bulk-fill restorative resins in class ii restorations. Oper Dent. 2020;45(2):123-33. doi: 10.2341/18-144-c
» https://doi.org/10.2341/18-144-c
- Tekçe N, Aydemir S, Demirci M, Tuncer S, Sancak E, Baydemir C. Clinical performance of direct posterior composite restorations with and without short glass-fiber-reinforced composite in endodontically treated teeth: 3-year results. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(2):127-37. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a44279
» https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a44279
- Sen Yavuz B, Kaya R, Kodaman Dokumacigil N, Ozgur EG, Bekiroglu N, Kargul B. Clinical performance of short fiber reinforced composite and glass hybrid on hypomineralized molars: a 36-month randomized split-mouth study. J Dent. 2024;144:104919. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104919
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104919
- Magne P, Goldberg J, Edelhoff D, Güth JF. Composite resin core buildups with and without post for the restoration of endodontically treated molars without ferrule. Oper Dent. 2016;41(1):64-75. doi: 10.2341/14-258-l
» https://doi.org/10.2341/14-258-l
- Aurélio IL, Fraga S, Rippe MP, Valandro LF. Are posts necessary for the restoration of root filled teeth with limited tissue loss? A structured review of laboratory and clinical studies. Int Endod J. 2016;49(9):827-35. doi: 10.1111/iej.12538
» https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12538
- Jurema AL, Filgueiras AT, Santos KA, Bresciani E, Caneppele TM. Effect of intraradicular fiber post on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated and restored anterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(1):13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.013
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.013
- Fousekis E, Lolis A, Marinakis E, Oikonomou E, Foros P, Koletsi D, et al. Short fiber-reinforced composite resins as post-and-core materials for endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. Forthcoming 2023 [cited 2024 Aug 30]. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.09.026. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.09.026
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.09.026
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.09.026
- Bergoli CD, Machry RV, Schwantz JK, Brondani LP, Pereira-Cenci T, Pereira GK, et al. Survival rate and treatment success of glass fiber posts cemented with two adhesive cementation strategies after up to 106 months: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(5):2197-206. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04939-x
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04939-x
- Sarkis-Onofre R, Amaral Pinheiro H, Poletto-Neto V, Bergoli CD, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Randomized controlled trial comparing glass fiber posts and cast metal posts. J Dent. 2020;96:103334. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103334
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103334
- Pires A, Poletto-Neto V, Chisini LA, Schwendicke F, Pereira-Cenci T. Post-retained restorations: a cost-minimization analysis nested in a randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2021;46(3):255-62. doi: 10.2341/20-056-c
» https://doi.org/10.2341/20-056-c
- Elderton RJ. Clinical studies concerning re-restoration of teeth. Adv Dent Res. 1990;4:4-9. doi: 10.1177/08959374900040010701
» https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374900040010701
- Hirata R, Hilgert LA, Sampaio CS, Andrade OS, Melo G, Ritter AV. Quo vadis, esthetic dentistry? Part II: Composite resin overtreatment and social media appeal. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024;36(1):32-6. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13162
» https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13162
- Scotti N, Comba A, Gambino A, Manzon E, Breschi L, Paolino D, et al. Influence of operator experience on non-carious cervical lesion restorations: clinical evaluation with different adhesive systems. Am J Dent. 2016;29(1):33-8.
- Weyant RJ. Teaching evidence-based practice: considerations for dental education. Dent Clin North Am. 2019;63(1):97-117. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2018.08.010
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2018.08.010
- Palcanis KG, Geiger BF, O'Neal MR, Ivankova NV, Evans RR, Kennedy LB, et al. Preparing students to practice evidence-based dentistry: a mixed methods conceptual framework for curriculum enhancement. J Dent Educ. 2012;76(12):1600-14.
- Barzkar F, Baradaran HR, Koohpayehzadeh J. Knowledge, attitudes and practice of physicians toward evidence-based medicine: a systematic review. J Evid Based Med. 2018;11(4):246-51. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12325
» https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12325
- Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Tabrizi JS, Azami-Aghdash S. Barriers to evidence-based medicine: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20(6):793-802. doi: 10.1111/jep.12222
» https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12222
- AlKetbi H, Hegazy F, Alnaqbi A, Shousha T. Evidence-based practice by physiotherapists in UAE: Investigating behavior, attitudes, awareness, knowledge and barriers. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0253215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253215
» https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253215
- Li S, Cao M, Zhu X. Evidence-based practice: Knowledge, attitudes, implementation, facilitators, and barriers among community nurses-systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(39):e17209. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000017209
» https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000017209
- Berkhout C, Berbra O, Favre J, Collins C, Calafiore M, Peremans L, et al. Defining and evaluating the Hawthorne effect in primary care, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:1033486. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1033486
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Alessandra Reis, Victor Pinheiro Feitosa, Ana Cláudia Chibinski, Michael Willian Favoreto, Mario Felipe Gutierrez, Alessandro Dourado Loguercio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todo o conteúdo do periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons do tipo atribuição CC-BY.
