Hydrogel microarchitecture as a regulatory cue for in vitro odontogenic differentiation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7765-2025-0607Keywords:
GelMA, Hydrogel, Dentin, Human dental pulp cells, Regenerative dentistry, Tissue engineeringAbstract
Objective This study introduces an innovative, cost-effective, and easily reproducible strategy for engineering three-dimensional bioprinted GelMA-based scaffolds, designed with ordered macroporous and tubular architectures, and integrated microfluidic channels to advance structural and functional performance. Their geometric features were specifically designed to investigate how microarchitectural cues influence the mineralizing cell differentiation of human dental pulp cells (HDPCs). Methodology The scaffolds were fabricated via an indirect bioprinting process using resin molds, resulting in cylindrical structures with distinct grid or honeycomb surface architectures. Biomaterials were characterized for morphology, surface topography, porosity, pore diameter, and degradability. Biological performance was evaluated by culturing HDPCs for 21 days to assess viability, proliferation, and mineralizing differentiation (ANOVA/Tukey; α=0.05). Results Both scaffold designs exhibited interconnected porous networks, with the honeycomb configuration presenting significantly larger pores. HDPCs cultured on the scaffolds showed high viability and proliferation, with the honeycomb architecture promoting elevated ALP activity. However, the grid architecture more effectively influenced odontoblastic differentiation and mineralized matrix deposition. Conclusion Our findings highlight the impact of biomaterial architecture on cellular behavior and reveal the potential of this novel bioprinting approach for bioactive dentin regeneration in dental tissue engineering.
Downloads
References
1- Athirasala A, Tahayeri A, Thrivikraman G, França CM, Monteiro N, Ferracane VTJ, et al. A dentin-derived hydrogel bioink for 3D bioprinting of cell laden scaffolds for regenerative dentistry. Biofabrication. 2018;10(2):024101. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa9b4e
» https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa9b4e
2- Zhang YY, Li QL, Wong HM. Cell-free biomimetic mineralization strategies to regenerate the enamel microstructure. Crystals 2021;11(11):1385. doi: 10.3390/cryst11111385
3- Bi F, Zhang Z, Guo W. Treated dentin matrix in tissue regeneration: recent advances. Pharmaceutics. 2022 Dec 27;15(1):91. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010091
4- Jia L, Tao S, Yang J, Liang K, Yu Z, Gao Y, et al. Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans on remineralized enamel surface induced by poly(amido amine) dendrimers. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2020;197:111409. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111409
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111409
5- Rosaian AS, Rao GN, Mohan SP, Vijayarajan M, Prabhakaran RC, Sherwood A. Regenerative capacity of dental pulp stem cells: a systematic review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2020;12(Suppl 1):S27-S36. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_121_20
» https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_121_20
6- Pohl S, Akamp T, Smeda M, Uderhardt S, Besold D, Krastl G, et al. Understanding dental pulp inflammation: from signaling to structure. Front. Immunol. 2024;15:1474466. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1474466
» https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2024.1474466
7- Gurucharan I, Saravana Karthikeyan B, Mahalaxmi S, Baskar K, Rajkumar G, Dhivya V, et al. Characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite incorporated carboxymethyl chitosan composite on human dental pulp stem cells. Int Endod J. 2023;56(4):486-501. doi: 10.1111/iej.13885
» https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13885
8- Zhou L, Shi W, Zhang X, Liu M, Zhang L, Jiang X, et al. Injectable tannin-containing hydroxypropyl chitin hydrogel as novel bioactive pulp capping material accelerates repair of inflamed dental pulp. Biomolecules. 2024;14(9):1129. doi: 10.3390/biom14091129
» https://doi.org/10.3390/biom14091129
9- Karunakaran S, Praveen N, Selvandran KE, Leburu A, Madhuram K, Kumar AR. Effectiveness of mineral trioxide aggregate and its modifications in inducing dentin bridge formation during pulp capping: a systematic review. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025;28(3):222-30. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_848_24
» https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_848_24
10- Umapathy VR, Natarajan PM, Swamikannu B. Regenerative strategies in dentistry: harnessing stem cells, biomaterials and bioactive materials for tissue repair. Biomolecules. 2025;15(4):546. doi: 10.3390/biom15040546
» https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15040546
11- Brizuela C, Ormeño A, Cabrera C, Cabezas R, Silva CI, Ramírez V, et al. Direct pulp capping with calcium hydroxide, mineral trioxide aggregate, and biodentine in permanent young teeth with caries: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2017;43(11):1776-80. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.06.031
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.06.031
12- Chung M, Lee S, Kim S, Kim E. Inflammatory response and odontogenic differentiation of inflamed dental pulp treated with different pulp capping materials: an in vivo study. Int Endod J. 2023;56(9):1118-28. doi: 10.1111/iej.13947
» https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13947
13- Huang ZY, Hermosa GC, Wu JS, Wu TL, Chien CC, Liao CS, et al. Chitosan-based antibacterial bioceramic materials for dental pulp capping. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025;11(10):6119-33. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c00466
» https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c00466
14- Anselmi C, Dal-Fabbro R, Abada H, Mendes Soares IP, Cardoso LM, Mahmoud AH, et al. Bilayer gelatin-methacryloyl scaffold for pulp inflammation suppression and dentin-like tissue regeneration. J Control Release. 2025 Nov 25;389:114469. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114469
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.114469
15- Osman M, Sharmin Z, Suchy S, Gao F, Kaminski A, Mitchell JC, et al. Bioinspired smart dentin ECM-chitosan hydrogels for dentin-pulp complex regeneration. J Dent. 2025;159:105811. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105811
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105811
16- Widyasari R, Cahyanto A, Widyaputra S, Rachman A. Fabrication and characterization of carbonate apatite-bovine gelatin scaffolds for endodontic regeneration: a lyophilization-based approach. Eur J Dent. 2025;19(4):1106-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1809306
» https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1809306
17- Peng M, Zhao Q, Wang M, Du X. Reconfigurable scaffolds for adaptive tissue regeneration. Nanoscale 2023;15(13):6105-20. doi: 10.1039/D3NR00281K
» https://doi.org/10.1039/D3NR00281K
18- Saravana-Karthikeyan B, Madhubala MM, Rajkumar G, Dhivya V, Kishen A, Srinivasan N, et al. Physico-chemical and biological characterization of synthetic and eggshell derived nanohydroxyapatite/carboxymethyl chitosan composites for pulp-dentin tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;271(Pt 1):132620. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.132620
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.132620
19- Cooke ME, Ramirez-GarciaLuna JL, Rangel-Berridi K, Park H, Nazhat SN, Weber MH, et al. 3D printed polyurethane scaffolds for the repair of bone defects. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:557215. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.557215
» https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.557215
20- Xia K, Chen Z, Chen J, Xu H, Xu Y, Yang T, et al. RGD- and VEGF-mimetic peptide epitope-functionalized self assembling peptide hydrogels promote dentin-pulp complex regeneration. Int J Nanomedicine. 2020;15:6631-47. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S253576
» https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S253576
21- Kamatar A, Gunay G, Acar H. Natural and synthetic biomaterials for engineering multicellular tumor spheroids. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(11):E2506. doi: 10.3390/polym12112506
» https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12112506
22- Swetha S, Lavanya K, Sruthi R, Selvamurugan N. An insight into cell-laden 3D-printed constructs for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8(43):9836-62. doi: 10.1039/d0tb02019b
» https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb02019b
23- Li L, Lin H, Jin S, Hu S, Sun W, Ji W. Synthetic sticky bone grafts enhance bone regeneration: a preclinical evaluation in rat models. J Appl Oral Sci. 2025;33:e20250108. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2025-0108
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2025-0108
24- Rajabi N, Kharaziha M, Emadi R, Zarrabi A, Mokhtari H, Salehi S. An adhesive and injectable nanocomposite hydrogel of thiolated gelatin/gelatin methacrylate/Laponite® as a potential surgical sealant. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;564:155-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.12.048
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.12.048
25- Liao F, Tian Z, Yang X, Yang H, Liu X, Liao H, et al. Hydrophobic association: a facile approach to prepare physical cross-linked gelatin hydrogel with desirable thermal stability, flexibility and self-healing ability. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;262(Pt 1):130058. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130058
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.130058
26- Duymaz D, Karaoglu IC, Kizilel S. Effect of photoinitiation process on photo-crosslinking of gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel networks. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2025;46(20):e00376. doi: 10.1002/marc.202500376
» https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.202500376
27- Qiao Y, Liu X, Zhou X, Zhang H, Zhang W, Xiao W, et al. Gelatin templated polypeptide co-cross-linked hydrogel for bone regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020;9(1):e1901239. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201901239
» https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201901239
28- Yuan Z, Yuan X, Zhao Y, Cai Q, Wang Y, Luo R. Injectable GelMA cryogel microspheres for modularized cell delivery and potential vascularized bone regeneration. Small 2021;17(11):2006596. doi: 10.1002/smll.202006596
» https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202006596
29- Zhang X, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Huangfu H, Yang Y, Qin Q, et al. 3D printed reduced graphene oxide-gelma hybrid hydrogel scaffolds for potential neuralized bone regeneration. J. Mater. Chem. B 2023;11(6):1288-301. doi: 10.1039/D2TB01979E
» https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TB01979E
30- Silva IS, Bordini EA, Bronze-Uhle ES, Stuani V, Costa MC, Carvalho LA, et al. Photo-crosslinkable hydrogel incorporated with bone matrix particles for advancements in dentin tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2024;112(12):2273-88. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.37777
» https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37777
31- Huang X, Xie S, Liu C, Xiao X, Tang H, Xu Y, et al. A novel vascularized hydrogel by encapsulation of lyophilized platelet-rich fibrin into gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel for bone regeneration. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2025;37(1):5 doi: 10.1007/s10856-025-06975-3
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-025-06975-3
32- Visser J, Gawlitta D, Benders KE, Toma SM, Pouran B, van Weeren PR, et al. Endochondral bone formation in gelatin methacrylamide hydrogel with embedded cartilage-derived matrix particles. Biomaterials. 2015;37:174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.020
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.020
33- Li Z, Li S, Yang J, Ha Y, Zhang Q, Zhou X, et al. 3D Bioprinted gelatin/gellan gum-based scaffold with double-crosslinking network for vascularized bone regeneration. Carbohydrate Polymers 2022; 290:119469. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119469
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119469
34- Yang T, Zhang Q, Xie L, Zhang R, Qian R, Tian Y, et al. hDPSC-Laden GelMA microspheres fabricated using electrostatic microdroplet method for endodontic regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021;121:111850. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111850
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111850
35- Bedell ML, Wang Z, Hogan KJ, Torres AL, Pearce HA, Chim LK, et al. The effect of multi-material architecture on the ex vivo osteochondral integration of bioprinted constructs. Acta Biomaterialia, 2023;155:99-112. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.11.014
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.11.014
36- Egan P F. Integrated design approaches for 3D printed tissue scaffolds: review and outlook. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(15): 2355. doi: 10.3390/ma12152355
» https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12152355
37- Bertassoni LE. Dentin on the nanoscale: hierarchical organization, mechanical behavior and bioinspired engineering. Dental Materials 2017;33(6):637-49. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.03.00
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.03.00
38- Sinha R, Câmara-Torres M, Scopece P, Falzacappa EV, Patelli A, Moroni L, et al. A hybrid additive manufacturing platform to create bulk and surface composition gradients on scaffolds for tissue regeneration. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):651. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20865-y
» https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20865-y
39- Bordini EA, Ferreira JA, Dubey N, Ribeiro JS, Souza Costa CA, Soares DG, et al. Injectable multifunctional drug delivery system for hard tissue regeneration under inflammatory microenvironments. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2021;4(9):6993-7006. doi: 10.1021/acsabm.1c00620
» https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.1c00620
40- Ribeiro JS, Daghrery A, Dubey N, Li C, Mei L, Fenno JC, et al. Hybrid antimicrobial hydrogel as injectable therapeutics for oral infection ablation. Biomacromolecules. 2020;21(9):3945-56. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c01131
» https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c01131
41- Soares DG, Anovazzi G, Bordini EA, Zuta UO, Silva Leite ML, Basso FG, et al. Biological analysis of simvastatin-releasing chitosan scaffold as a cell-free system for pulp-dentin regeneration. J Endod. 2018;44(6):971-6.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.014
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.014
42- Salem EM, Abdelfatah OM, Hanafy RA, El-Sharkawy RM, Elnawawy G, Alghonemy WY. Comparative study of pulpal response following direct pulp capping using synthesized fluorapatite and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05285-4
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05285-4
43- Tiyapitsanupaisan N, Kantrong N, Puasiri S, Makeudom A, Krisanaprakornkit S, Chailertvanitkul P. Effects of Thai propolis mixed in mineral trioxide aggregate on matrix metalloproteinase-2 expression and activity in inflamed human dental pulp cells. J Appl Oral Sci. 2024;32:e20240168. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2024-0168
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2024-0168
44- Dadgar A, Maleki Dizaj S, Alizadeh Oskoee P, Pournaghi Azar F, Jafari Navimipour E. Gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds containing rutin nanoparticles: physicochemical properties, antibacterial action, and anti-inflammatory effect on dental pulp stem cells. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):1129. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06385-5
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06385-5
45- Li X, Zhao S, Liu Y, Gu Y, Qiu L, Chen X, et al. Electric field promoted odontogenic differentiation of stem cells from apical papilla by remodelling cytoskeleton. Int Endod J. 2025;58(6):873-89. doi: 10.1111/iej.14213
» https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14213
46- Mendi A, Yagci BG, Kiziloglu M, Saraç N, Yilmaz D, Ugur A, et al. Effects of Syzygium aromaticum, Cinnamomum zeylanicum, and Salvia triloba extracts on proliferation and differentiation of dental pulp stem cells. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017;25(5):515-22. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0522
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0522
47- Machla F, Sokolova V, Platania V, Prymak O, Kostka K, Kruse B, et al. Tissue engineering at the dentin-pulp interface using human treated dentin scaffolds conditioned with DMP1 or BMP2 plasmid DNA-carrying calcium phosphate nanoparticles. Acta Biomater. 2023;159:156-72. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2023.01.044
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2023.01.044
48- Chen C, Yun Q, Ran J, Zhou Z, Zhang P, Li R. The Hippo-YAP/ß-catenin signaling axis coordinates odontogenic differentiation in dental pulp stem cells: implications for dentin-pulp regeneration. PLoS One. 2025;20(6):e0326978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326978
» https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326978
49- Hosseini FS, Whitfield T, Orlando JD, Deng C, Abedini AA, Argyrou C, et al. Osteoinductive low-dose 3D porous calcium phosphate graphene oxide-integrated matrices enhance osteogenesis and mechanical properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025;122(28):e2427124122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2427124122
» https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2427124122
50- Wei S, Ma JX, Xu L, Gu XS, Ma XL. Biodegradable materials for bone defect repair. Mil Med Res. 2020;7(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40779-020-00280-6
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00280-6
51- Li J, Moeinzadeh S, Kim C, Pan CC, Weale G, Kim S, et al. Development and systematic characterization of GelMA/alginate/PEGDMA/xanthan gum hydrogel bioink system for extrusion bioprinting. Biomaterials. 2023;293:121969. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121969
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121969
52- Takabatake K, Tsujigiwa H, Nakano K, Inada Y, Qiusheng S, Kawai H, et al. Geometrical structure of honeycomb TCP to control dental pulp-derived cell differentiation. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(22):5155. doi: 10.3390/ma13225155
» https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13225155
53- Cedillo-Servin G, Dahri O, Meneses J, van Duijn J, Moon H, Sage F, et al. 3D printed magneto-active microfiber scaffolds for remote stimulation and guided organization of 3D in vitro skeletal muscle models. Small. 2024;20(12):e2307178. doi: 10.1002/smll.202307178
» https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202307178
54- Olivares AL, Marsal E, Planell JA, Lacroix D. Finite element study of scaffold architecture design and culture conditions for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30(30):6142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.07.041
55- Wu MC, Yu HW, Chen YQ, Ou MH, Serrano R, Huang GL, et al. Early committed polarization of intracellular tension in response to cell shape determines the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells. Acta Biomaterialia. 2023;163:287-301. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.10.052
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.10.052
56- Ma C, Qu T, Chang B, Jing Y, Feng JQ, Liu X. 3D maskless micropatterning for regeneration of highly organized tubular tissues. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018;7:1700738. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700738
» https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700738
57- Schmidleithner C, Malferrari S, Palgrave R, Bomze D, Schwentenwein M, Kalaskar DM. Application of high resolution DLP stereolithography for fabrication of tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration. Biomed Mater. 2019;14(4):045018. doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ab279d
58- Gao C, Rahaman MN, Gao Q, Teramoto A, Abe K. Robotic deposition and in vitro characterization of 3D gelatin-bioactive glass hybrid scaffolds for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;101(7):2027-37. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34496
» https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34496
59- Lee W, Oh JH, Park JC, Shin HI, Baek JH, Ryoo HM, et al. Performance of electrospun poly (e-caprolactone) fiber meshes used with mineral trioxide aggregates in a pulp capping procedure. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(8):2986-95. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.032
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.04.032
60- Hayashi K, Ishikawa K. Effects of nanopores on the mechanical strength, osteoclastogenesis, and osteogenesis in honeycomb scaffolds. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8(37):8536-45. doi: 10.1039/d0tb01498b
» https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb01498b
61- Liu T, Zhang Y, Sun M, Jin M, Xia W, Yang H, et al Effect of freezing process on the microstructure of gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:810155. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.810155
» https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.810155
62- Sun M, Sun X, Wang Z, Guo S, Yu G, Yang H. Synthesis and properties of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels and their recent applications in load-bearing tissue. Polymers (Basel). 2018;10(11):1290. doi: 10.3390/polym10111290
» https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10111290
63- Martinez-Garcia FD, Fischer T, Hayn A, Mierke CT, Burgess JK, Harmsen MC. A Beginner's guide to the characterization of hydrogel microarchitecture for cellular applications. Gels. 2022;8(9):535. doi: 10.3390/gels8090535
» https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8090535
64- Njeh A, Uzunoglu E, Ardila-Osorio H, Simon S, Berdal A, Kellermann O, et al. Reactionary and reparative dentin formation after pulp capping: hydrogel vs. Dycal. Evid Based Endod. 2016;1(1). doi: 10.1186/s41121-016-0003-9
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todo o conteúdo do periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons do tipo atribuição CC-BY.
