Apical delta filling with calcium silicate and epoxy resin sealers using different obturation techniques by microcomputed tomography

Authors

  • Washington Soares dos Santos Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora
  • Jefferson Augusto Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora
  • Angelo José Sócrates Torres-Carrillo Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora
  • Igor Bassi Ferreira Petean Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora
  • Antonio Miranda da Cruz-Filho Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora
  • Manoel Damião de Sousa-Neto Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora
  • Fabiane Carneiro Lopes-Olhê Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora
  • Jardel Francisco Mazzi-Chaves Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7765-2025-0774

Keywords:

3D printing, Calcium silicate cement-based sealers, Micro–computed tomography, Obturation, Apical delta

Abstract

Objectives  This study aimed to evaluate the filling quality of simulated apical deltas in 3D-printed tooth replicas using microcomputed tomography and comparisons of two obturation techniques and calcium silicate cement-based sealer groups. Methodology  A single-rooted, straight maxillary premolar was instrumented and scanned by microcomputed tomography to generate a 3D model. Apical delta configurations were digitally created and integrated into the canal anatomy. In total, 40 translucent resin replicas were 3D printed and randomly assigned for obturation with one of four sealer groups (AH Plus Resin, AH Plus Bioceramic, Bio-C Sealer, and NeoSealer Flo). Following obturation, all specimens were rescanned, and a volumetric analysis was performed to determine the percentage of the filled volume in the apical delta region. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA and the Kruskal-Wallis test (α=0.05). Results  The continuous wave technique resulted in significantly greater apical delta filling than the single-cone one regardless of sealer. For the single-cone technique, NeoSealer Flo showed the highest filling percentage (42.7±2.0), followed by Bio-C Sealer (28.7±1.1), AH Plus Resin (24.9±1.9), and AH Plus Bioceramic (17.9±1.0). For the continuous wave technique, Bio-C Sealer showed the most filling (66.2±2.0), followed by NeoSealer Flo (54.2±1.4), AH Plus Resin (45.9±1.5) and AH Plus Bioceramic (36.8±1.0). Conclusions  The continuous wave technique achieved the most apical filling, with Bio-C sealer showing the highest performance. Bio-C and NeoSealer Flo achieved significantly higher filling percentages than AH Plus Resin and AH Plus Bioceramic under the single-cone technique.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1- Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984;58(5):589-9. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(84)90085-9

» https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(84)90085-9

2- Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Topics. 2005;10(1):3-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00129.x

» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00129.x

3- Briseño-Marroquín B, Paqué F, Maier K, Willershausen B, Wolf TG. Root canal morphology and configuration of 179 maxillary first molars by means of micro-computed tomography: an ex vivo study. J Endod. 2015;41(12):2008-13. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.09.007

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.09.007

4- Mazzi-Chaves JF, Silva-Sousa YT, Leoni GB, Silva-Sousa AC, Estrela L, Estrela C, et al. Micro-computed tomographic assessment of the variability and morphological features of root canal system and their ramifications. J Appl Oral Sci. 2020;28:e20190393. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0393

» https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0393

5- Rosa-e-Silva VL, Ramirez I, Prado HS, Cardoso GS, Petean I, Sousa-Neto MD, et al. Efficacy of calcium silicate cement-based sealer in filling lateral root canals: a simulated lateral canal study. J Endod. 2025;51(9):1242-50. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2025.05.022

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2025.05.022

6- Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN. Clinical implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures. J Endod. 2008;34(11):1291-301. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.028

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.07.028

7- Barthel C, Zimmer S, Trope M. Relationship of radiologic and histologic signs of inflammation in human root-filled teeth. J Endod. 2004;30(2):75-9. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200402000-00003

» https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200402000-00003

8- Seltzer S, Bender IB, Smith J, Freedman I, Nazimov H. Endodontic failures: an analysis based on clinical, roentgenographic, and histologic findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1967;23(4):500-16. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(67)90546-4

» https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(67)90546-4

9- Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr. Fate of the tissue in lateral canals and apical ramifications in response to pathologic conditions and treatment procedures. J Endod. 2010;36(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.038

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.038

10- Mittal N, Gupta S, Gupta S, Bansal R, Grover V, Bogra P, et al. Comparative evaluation of the sealing ability of root canal sealers: an in vitro study using dye penetration and scanning electron microscopic analysis. Cureus. 2025;17(3):e80741. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80741

» https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.80741

11- Chelja R, Revankar VD, Chakravarthy Y, Aarthi G, Noon AM. In vitro comparison of bioceramic and silicone-based root canal sealers with different obturation technique. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025;28(6):527-31. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_175_25

» https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_175_25

12- Duarte MA, Marciano MA, Vivan RR, Tanomaru-Filho M, Tanomaru JM, Camilleri J. Tricalcium silicate-based cements: properties and modifications. Braz Oral Res. 2018;32(Suppl 1):e70. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0070

» https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0070

13- Arslan H, Abbas A, Karatas E. Influence of ultrasonic and sonic activation of epoxy-amine resin-based sealer on penetration of sealer into lateral canals. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(8):2161-4. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1737-z

» https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1737-z

14- Zamparini F, Prati C, Taddei P, Spinelli A, Di Foggia M, Gandolfi MG. Chemical-physical properties and bioactivity of new premixed calcium silicate-bioceramic root canal sealers. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(22):13914. doi: 10.3390/ijms232213914

» https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232213914

15- Fonseca B, Coelho MS, Bueno CE, Fontana CE, Martin AS, Rocha DG. Assessment of extrusion and postoperative pain of a bioceramic and resin-based root canal sealer. Eur J Dent. 2019;13(3):343-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3399457

» https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3399457

16- Ørstavik D. Endodontic filling materials. Endod Topics. 2014;31(1):53-67. doi: 10.1111/etp.12068

» https://doi.org/10.1111/etp.12068

17- Chybowski EA, Glickman GN, Patel Y, Fleury A, Solomon E, He J. Clinical outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment using a single-cone technique with endosequence bioceramic sealer: a retrospective analysis. J Endod. 2018;44(6):941-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.019

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.019

18- Goldberg F, Artaza L, Silvio A. Influence of calcium hydroxide dressing on the obturation of simulated lateral canals. J Endod. 2002;28(2):99-101. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200202000-00012

» https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200202000-00012

19- Dulac KA, Nielsen CJ, Tomazic TJ, Ferrillo PJ Jr, Hatton JF. Comparison of the obturation of lateral canals by six techniques. J Endod. 1999;25(5):376-80. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)81175-1

» https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(06)81175-1

20- Venturi M, Lenarda R, Prati C, Breschi L. An in vitro model to investigate filling of lateral canals. J Endod. 2005;31(12):877-81. doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000164131.46519.d5

» https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000164131.46519.d5

21- Venturi M, Lenarda R, Breschi L. An ex vivo comparison of three different gutta-percha cones when compacted at different temperatures: rheological considerations in relation to the filling of lateral canals. Int Endod J. 2006;39(8):648-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01133.x

» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01133.x

22- Keles A, Alcin H, Kamalak A, Versiani MA. Micro-CT evaluation of root filling quality in oval-shaped canals. Int Endod J. 2014;47(12):1177-84. doi: 10.1111/iej.12269

» https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12269

23- Wolf TG, Willems L, Briseño-Marroquín B. An in vitro endodontic model to quantify the accessory canal filling potential of the vertical and lateral condensation techniques. Aust Endod J. 2021;47(2):245-51. doi: 10.1111/aej.12465

» https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12465

24- Naseri M, Kangarlou A, Khavid A, Goodini M. Evaluation of the quality of four root canal obturation techniques using micro-computed tomography. Iran Endod J. 2013;8(3):89-93.

25- Torres-Carrillo AJ, Assis HC, Salazar-Gamarra RE, Teodosio LM, Silva-Sousa AC, Mazzi-Chaves JF, et al. Evaluation of different techniques and materials for filling in 3-dimensional printed teeth replicas with perforating internal resorption by means of micro-computed tomography. J Endod. 2024;50(2):205-12. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.10.014

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2023.10.014

26- Donnermeyer D, Ibing M, Burklein S, Weber I, Reitze MP, Schafer E. Physico-chemical investigation of endodontic sealers exposed to simulated intracanal heat application: hydraulic calcium silicate-based sealers. Materials. 2021;14(4):728. doi: 10.3390/ma14040728

» https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14040728

27- Eid D, Medioni E, De-Deus G, Khalil I, Naaman A, Zogheib C. Impact of warm vertical compaction on the sealing ability of calcium silicate-based sealers: a confocal microscopic evaluation. Materials. 2021;14(2):372. doi: 10.3390/ma14020372

» https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14020372

28- Alberdi KJ, Martin G, Risso L, Kaplan A. Effect of heat generated by endodontic obturation techniques on bond strength of bioceramic sealers to dentine. J Endod. 2023;49(11):1565-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.08.021

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2023.08.021

29- Agrawal TS, Singh S, Podar RS, Kulkarni G, Gadkari A, Agarwal N. In vitro comparative evaluation of apical leakage using a bioceramic sealer with three different obturating techniques: a glucose leakage model. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024;27(1):76-81. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_303_23

» https://doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_303_23

30- Atmeh AR, Hadis M, Camilleri J. Real-time chemical analysis of root filling materials with heating: guidelines for safe temperature levels. Int Endod J. 2020;53(5):698-708. doi: 10.1111/iej.13269

31- Pradelli JA, Jampani JL, Santos-Junior AO, Tanomaru-Filho M, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM. Physicochemical and antibiofilm properties of new ready-to-use and powder/gel bioceramic endodontic sealers. Braz Oral Res. 2025;39:e076. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.076

» https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2025.vol39.076

32- Zhou HM, Shen Y, Zheng W, Li L, Zheng YF, Haapasalo M. Physical properties of 5 root canal sealers. J Endod. 2013;39(10):1281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.06.012

33- Akcay M, Arslan H, Durmus N, Mese M, Capar ID. Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, iRoot SP, MTA fillapex, and guttaflow bioseal root canal sealers after different final irrigation procedures: a confocal microscopic study. Lasers Surg Med. 2016;48(1):70-6. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22446

» https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22446

34- Gok T, Capar ID, Akcay I, Keles A. Evaluation of different techniques for filling simulated C-shaped canals of 3-dimensional printed resin teeth. J Endod. 2017;43(9):1559-64. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.04.029

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.04.029

35- Soo WK, Thong YL, Gutmann JL. A comparison of four gutta-percha filling techniques in simulated C-shaped canals. Int Endod J. 2015;48(8):736-46. doi: 10.1111/iej.12371

» https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12371

36- Gao X, Tay FR, Gutmann JL, Fan W, Xu T, Fan B. Micro-CT evaluation of apical delta morphologies in human teeth. Sci Rep. 2016;6:36501. doi: 10.1038/srep36501

» https://doi.org/10.1038/srep36501

37- Camilleri J. Sealers and warm Gutta-percha obturation techniques. J Endod. 2015;41(1):72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.007

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.007

38- Nawar NN, Elashiry MM, Banna A, Saber SM, Schäfer E. Ex vivo evaluation of clinically-set hydraulic sealers used with different canal dryness protocols and obturation techniques: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(11):612. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06006-5

» https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-06006-5

39- Pelozo LL, Souza-Gabriel AE, Santos GN, Camargo RV, Lopes-Olhê FC, Sousa-Neto MD, et al. Canal drying protocols to use with calcium silicate-based sealer: effect on bond strength and adhesive interface. J Endod. 2023;49(9):1154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.07.015

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2023.07.015

Downloads

Published

2026-03-23

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Santos, W. S. dos, Augusto, J., Torres-Carrillo, A. J. S., Petean, I. B. F., Cruz-Filho, A. M. da, Sousa-Neto, M. D. de, Lopes-Olhê, F. C., & Mazzi-Chaves, J. F. (2026). Apical delta filling with calcium silicate and epoxy resin sealers using different obturation techniques by microcomputed tomography. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 34, e2025-0744. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7765-2025-0774