Physicomechanical properties of PMMA denture base resins reinforced with nanofibers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

  • Bianca Tavares Rangel Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru. Departamento de Prótese e Periodontia
  • Amanda Aparecida Maia Neves Garcia Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru. Departamento de Prótese e Periodontia
  • Carolina Yoshi Campos Sugio lUniversidade Federal de Uberlândia. Faculdade de Odontologia, Departamento de Prótese Removível e Materiais Dentários
  • Vanessa Migliorini Urban Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa. Departamento de Odontologia.
  • Simone Soares Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru. Departamento de Prótese e Periodontia
  • Joel Ferreira Santiago Júnior lUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Ribeirão Preto. Departamento de Materiais Dentários e Prótese.
  • André Ulisses Dantas Batista Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru. Departamento de Prótese e Periodontia
  • Karin Hermana Neppelenbroek Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru. Departamento de Prótese e Periodontia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7765-2026-0076

Keywords:

Dentures, Polymethyl methacrylate, Acrylic resins, Nanofibers, Flexural strength

Abstract

Despite the potential of nanofibers to reinforce poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) denture base resins, no consensus exists regarding their effects on material properties. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether the incorporation of nanofibers into PMMA denture base resins improves flexural strength and other physicomechanical properties when compared with unmodified PMMA. Methodology:  This study followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered on the Open Science Framework (<osf.io/3g9pn>). Searches were conducted on Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, and SciELO. Eligibility criteria included in vitro or in vivo studies comparing nanofiber-reinforced PMMA to conventional PMMA. The meta-analysis was conducted for flexural strength (the only property assessed in all studies). A subgroup meta-analysis was performed to explore heterogeneity between studies. Results:  From the 1,893 initially screened articles, six were included. The investigated nanofibers included carbon, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, polyamide-6, polystyrene, cellulose, PMMA–cerium, and polyvinyl alcohol at concentrations from 0.1 to 23%. The evaluated properties included impact strength, flexural strength, fracture resistance, hardness, elasticity, toughness, surface roughness, contact angle, and spectrophotometric color analysis. While the qualitative analysis showed divergent findings regarding property improvement, the quantitative analysis revealed no significant differences in flexural strength between nanofiber-reinforced PMMA and conventional PMMA at the evaluated concentrations: PMMA vs. 0.5% PMMA (p=0.554), PMMA vs. 1% PMMA (p=0.847), PMMA vs. 3% PMMA (p=0.9825), and PMMA vs. 5% PMMA (p=0.222). However, subgroup analysis indicated higher flexural strength for the conventional PMMA when compared with nanofiber-reinforced PMMA, particularly at higher nanofiber concentrations (p<0.0001). Conclusion:  Incorporating nanofibers into PMMA resulted in no significant increase in flexural strength, showing inconsistent effects on other physicomechanical properties. Therefore, further standardized laboratory and clinical studies are needed to clarify its efficacy and clinical applicability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1- Garcia AA, Sugio CY, Azevedo-Silva LJ, Gomes AC, Batista AU, Porto VC, et al. Nanoparticle-modified PMMA to prevent denture stomatitis: a systematic review. Arch Microbiol. 2022;204(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02653-4

» https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02653-4

2- Uyar T, Çökeliler D, Doğan M, Koçum IC, Karatay O, Denkbaş EB. Electrospun nanofiber reinforcement of dental composites with electromagnetic alignment approach. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;62:762–70. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.02.001

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.02.001

3- Somani MV, Khandelwal M, Punia V, Sharma V. The effect of incorporating various reinforcement materials on flexural strength and impact strength of polymethylmethacrylate: a meta-analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2019;19(2):101–12. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_313_18

» https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_313_18

4- Vallittu PK, Lassila VP, Lappalainen R. The effect of notch shape and self-cured acrylic resin repair on the fatigue resistance of an acrylic resin denture base. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23(2):108-13. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb01218.x

» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1996.tb01218.x

5- Gad MM, Fouda SM, Al-Harbi FA, Näpänkangas R, Raustia A. PMMA denture base material enhancement: a review of fiber, filler, and nanofiller addition. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:3801-12. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S130722

» https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S130722

6- Al-Dwairi ZN, Tahboub KY, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ. A comparison of the flexural and impact strengths and flexural modulus of CAD/CAM and conventional heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). J Prosthodont. 2020;29(4):341-9. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12926

» https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12926

7- Gonçalves NI, Münchow EA, Santos JD, Sato TP, Oliveira LR, Arruda Paes-Junior TJ, et al. The role of polymeric nanofibers on the mechanical behavior of polymethyl methacrylate resin. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;112:104072. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104072

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104072

8- Cramer NB, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN. Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials. J Dent Res. 2011;90(4):402-16. doi: 10.1177/0022034510381263

» https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510381263

9- Takamiya AS, Monteiro DR, Marra J, Compagnoni MA, Barbosa DB. Complete denture wearing and fractures among edentulous patients treated in university clinics. Gerodontology. 2012;29(2):e728-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00551.x

» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00551.x

10- Fong H. Electrospun nylon 6 nanofiber reinforced BIS-GMA/TEGDMA dental restorative composite resins. Polymer. 2004;45(7):2427-32. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.01.067

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2004.01.067

11- Dodiuk-Kenig H, Lizenboim K, Roth S, Zalsman B, McHale WA, Jaffe M, et al. Performance enhancement of dental composites using electrospun nanofibers. J Nanomater. 2008;2008:840254. doi: 10.1155/2008/840254

» https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/840254

12- Xue J, Xie J, Liu W, Xia Y. Electrospun nanofibers: new concepts, materials, and applications. Acc Chem Res. 2017;50(8):1976-87. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00174

» https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00174

13- Toriello M, Afsari M, Shon HK, Tijing LD. Progress on the fabrication and application of electrospun nanofiber composites. Membranes (Basel). 2020;10(9):204. doi: 10.3390/membranes10090204

» https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10090204

14- Kim JW, Gardner JM, Sauti G, Wincheski RA, Jensen BD, Wise KE, et al. Multi-scale hierarchical carbon nanotube fiber reinforced composites towards enhancement of axial/transverse strength and fracture toughness. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2023;167:107449. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107449

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107449

15- Chowdhury SA, Saha MC, Patterson S, Robison T, Liu Y. Highly conductive polydimethylsiloxane/carbon nanofiber composites for flexible sensor applications. Adv Mater Technol. 2019;4(1):1800398. doi: 10.1002/admt.201800398

» https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201800398

16- Wang X, Cai Q, Zhang X, Wei Y, Xu M, Yang X, et al. Improved performance of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA dental composites by net-like structures formed from SiO2 nanofiber fillers. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;59:464-70. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.044

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.044

17- Albergaria LS, Scotti CK, Mondelli RF, Vega HA, Faggion CM Jr, Bombonatti JF, et al. Effect of nanofibers as reinforcement on resin-based dental materials: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2023;59:239-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2023.07.002

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2023.07.002

18- Jeevanandam J, Barhoum A, Chan YS, Dufresne A, Danquah MK. Review on nanoparticles and nanostructured materials: history, sources, toxicity and regulations. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2018;9:1050-74. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.9.98

» https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.98

19- Sarma A, Bania R, Devi JR, Deka S. Therapeutic nanostructures and nanotoxicity. J Appl Toxicol. 2021;41(10):1494-517. doi: 10.1002/jat.4157

» https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.4157

20- Thostenson ET, Ren Z, Chou TW. Advances in the science and technology of carbon nanotubes and their composites: a review. Compos Sci Technol. 2001;61(13):1899-912. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00094-X

» https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00094-X

21- Alla RK, Sajjan S, Alluri VR, Ginjupalli K, Upadhya NP. Influence of fiber reinforcement on the properties of denture base resins. J Biomater Nanobiotechnol. 2013;4(1):91-7. doi: 10.4236/jbnb.2013.41012

» https://doi.org/10.4236/jbnb.2013.41012

22- Tacir IH, Kama JD, Zortuk M, Eskimez S. Flexural properties of glass fibre reinforced acrylic resin polymers. Aust Dent J. 2006;51(1):52-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00401.x

» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2006.tb00401.x

23- Elmadani AA, Radović I, Tomić NZ, Petrović M, Stojanović DB, Heinemann RJ, et al. Hybrid denture acrylic composites with nanozirconia and electrospun polystyrene fibers. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0226528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226528

» https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226528

24- Karatepe UY, Ozdemir T. Improving mechanical and antibacterial properties of PMMA via polyblend electrospinning with silk fibroin and polyethyleneimine towards dental applications. Bioact Mater. 2020;5(3):510-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.04.005

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.04.005

25- Aldegheishem A, AlDeeb M, Al-Ahdal K, Helmi M, Alsagob EI. Influence of Influence of reinforcing agents on the mechanical properties of denture base resin: a systematic review. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(18):3083. doi: 10.3390/polym13183083

» https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13183083

26- Santiago JF Jr, Batista VE, Verri FR, Honório HM, Mello CC, Almeida DA, et al. Platform-switching implants and bone preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(3):332-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.11.009

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.11.009

27- Medeiros FC, Kudo GA, Leme BG, Saraiva PP, Verri FR, Honório HM, et al. Dental implants in patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47(4):480-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.021

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.021

28- Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley; 2009. doi: 10.1002/9780470743386

» https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386

29- Fekete JT, Győrffy B. MetaAnalysisOnline.com: web-based tool for the rapid meta-analysis of clinical and epidemiological studies. J Med Internet Res. 2025;27:e64016. doi: 10.2196/64016

» https://doi.org/10.2196/64016

30- International Organization for Standardization. ISO 20795-1:2013: dentistry—base polymers—Part 1: denture base polymers. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2013.

31- Annibali S, Bignozzi I, Cristalli MP, Graziani F, La Monaca G, Polimeni A. Peri-implant marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing platform switching versus conventionally restored implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39(11):1097-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01930.x

» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01930.x

32- Deeks JJ, Higgins JP, Altman DG. Chapter 10: analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al., editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 6.1. London: Cochrane; 2020. Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook

» www.training.cochrane.org/handbook

33- Dai X, Xu Z, Li Z, Sun Y, Zhang S, Han B. Improving flexural properties of polymethyl methacrylate denture filled by carbon nanofibers under low filling content. Mater Res Express. 2021;8(1):015404. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/abdd4f

» https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/abdd4f

34- Kawaguchi T, Lassila LVJ, Baba H, Tashiro S, Hamanaka I, Takahashi Y, et al. Effect of cellulose nanofiber content on flexural properties of a model, thermoplastic, injection-molded, polymethyl methacrylate denture base material. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;102:103513. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103513

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103513

35- Yamazaki Y, Ito T, Ogawa T, Hong G, Yamada Y, Hamada T, et al. Potential of pure cellulose nanofibers as a denture base material. J Oral Sci. 2021;63(1):111-3. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.20-0245

» https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.20-0245

36- Rangel BT, Costa MP, Farias RM, Figueiredo LR, Dias RT, Medeiros ES, et al. Incorporation of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)-cerium (Ce) nanofibers into acrylic resin for removable denture bases: evaluation of physical-mechanical properties, cytotoxicity, and antifungal activity. J Dent. 2026;166:106317. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106317

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106317

37- Kostić M, Krunić N, Nikolić L. Influence of residual monomer reduction on acrylic denture base resin quality. Hem Ind. 2011;65(2):171-7. doi: 10.2298/HEMIND101103008K

» https://doi.org/10.2298/HEMIND101103008K

38- Murat S, Alp G, Alatalı C, Uzun M. In vitro evaluation of adhesion of Candida albicans on CAD/CAM PMMA-based polymers. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):e873-9. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12942

» https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12942

39- Vallittu PK, Ruyter IE, Buykuilmaz S. Effect of polymerization temperature and time on the residual monomer content of denture base polymers. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106(1):588-93. doi: 10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106109.x

» https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106109.x

40- Casucci A, Verniani G, Barbieri AL, Ricci NM, Ferrari Cagidiaco E, Ferrari M. Flexural strength analysis of different complete denture resin-based materials obtained by conventional and digital manufacturing. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(19):6559. doi: 10.3390/ma16196559

» https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16196559

41- Fueki K, Ohkubo C, Yatabe M, Arakawa I, Arita M, Ino S, et al. Clinical application of removable partial dentures using thermoplastic resin. Part II: material properties and clinical features of non-metal clasp dentures. J Prosthodont Res. 2014;58(2):71-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2014.03.002

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2014.03.002

42- Krause WR, Park SH, Straup RA. Mechanical properties of BIS-GMA resin short glass fiber composites. J Biomed Mater Res. 1989;23(10):1195-211. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820231008

» https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820231008

43- Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Short glass fiber reinforced restorative composite resin with semi-interpenetrating polymer network matrix. Dent Mater. 2007;23(11):1356-62. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.017

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.017

4- Gu Y, Li M, Zhang Z, Sun Z. Void formation model and measuring method of void formation condition during hot pressing process. Polym Compos. 2010;31(9):1562-71. doi: 10.1002/pc.20944

» https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.20944

45- Prpić V, Schauperl Z, Ćatić A, Dulčić N, Čimić S. Comparison of mechanical properties of 3D-printed, CAD/CAM, and conventional denture base materials. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(6):524-8. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13175

» https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13175

4- Alp G, Murat S, Yilmaz B. Comparison of flexural strength of different CAD/CAM PMMA-based polymers. J Prosthodont 2019; 28: 491-5. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12755

» https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12755

47- Gad MM, Abualsaud R, Khan SQ. Hydrophobicity of denture base resins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022;12(2):139-59. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_213_21

» https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_213_21

48- Yunus N, Rashid AA, Azmi LL, Abu-Hassan MI. Some flexural properties of a nylon denture base polymer. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(1):65-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01370.x

» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01370.x

49- Sasaki H, Hamanaka I, Takahashi Y, Kawaguchi T. Effect of long-term water immersion or thermal shock on mechanical properties of high-impact acrylic denture base resins. Dent Mater J. 2016;35:204-9. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2015-291

» https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2015-291

50- Craig RG, Powers JM. Restorative dental materials. 11th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2002.

51- Regis RR, Zanini AP, Della Vecchia MP, Silva-Lovato CH, Oliveira Paranhos HF, Souza RF. Physical properties of an acrylic resin after incorporation of an antimicrobial monomer. J Prosthodont. 2011;20(5):372-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00719.x

» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00719.x

52- Vuksic J, Pilipovic A, Poklepovic Pericic T, Kranjcic J. The influence of contemporary denture base fabrication methods on residual monomer content, flexural strength and microhardness. Materials (Basel). 2024;17(5):1052. doi: 10.3390/ma17051052

» https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17051052

53- Ilie N, Hilton TJ, Heintze SD, Hickel R, Watts DC, Silikas N, et al. Academy of Dental Materials guidance—resin composites: Part I—mechanical properties. Dent Mater. 2017;33(8):880-94. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.013

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.013

54- Topouzi M, Kontonasaki E, Bikiaris D, Papadopoulou L, Paraskevopoulos KM, Koidis P. Reinforcement of a PMMA resin for interim fixed prostheses with silica nanoparticles. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;69:213-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.013

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.013

55- Lassila L, Keulemans F, Säilynoja E, Vallittu PK, Garoushi S. Mechanical properties and fracture behavior of flowable fiber reinforced composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2018;34(4):598-606. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.01.002

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.01.002

56- Fouda SM, Gad MM, El-Din MS, Khan SQ, Othman A, von See C, et al. Assessing the color and surface characteristics of additively fabricated denture base resins containing nanoparticles. Int J Dent. 2025;2025:5177847. doi: 10.1155/ijod/5177847

» https://doi.org/10.1155/ijod/5177847

57- Zissis AJ, Polyzois GL, Yannikakis SA, Harrison A. Roughness of denture materials: a comparative study. Int J Prosthodont. 2000;13(2):136–40.

58- Alp G, Johnston WM, Yilmaz B. Optical properties and surface roughness of prepolymerized poly(methyl methacrylate) denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(2):347-52. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.001

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.001

59- Foggi CC, Machado AL, Zamperini CA, Fernandes D, Wady AF, Vergani CE. Effect of surface roughness on the hydrophobicity of a denture-base acrylic resin and Candida albicans colonization. J Investig Clin Dent. 2016;7(2):141-8. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12125

» https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12125

60- Oyar P, Ulusoy M, Durkan R. Effects of repeated use of tungsten carbide burs on the surface roughness and contact angles of a CAD-CAM PMMA denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(6):1358-62. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.032

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.11.032

61- AlBin-Ameer MA, Alsrheed MY, Aldukhi IA, Matin A, Khan SQ, Abualsaud R, et al. Effect of protective coating on surface properties and Candida albicans adhesion to denture base materials. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(1):80-6. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13118

» https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13118

62- Yoshijima Y, Murakami K, Kayama S, Liu D, Hirota K, Ichikawa T, et al. Effect of substrate surface hydrophobicity on the adherence of yeast and hyphal Candida. Mycoses. 2010;53(3):221-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01694.x

» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01694.x

Downloads

Published

2026-08-03

Issue

Vol. 34 (2026)

Section

Original Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Todo o conteúdo do periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons do tipo atribuição CC-BY.

 

 

How to Cite

Rangel, B. T., Garcia, A. A. M. N., Sugio, C. Y. C., Urban, V. M., Soares, S., Santiago Júnior, J. F., Batista, A. U. D., & Neppelenbroek, K. H. (2026). Physicomechanical properties of PMMA denture base resins reinforced with nanofibers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 34, e20260076. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7765-2026-0076