Prevalence and factors associated with pulp stones: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression

Authors

  • Yasmin Alves Sanches Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Faculdade de Odontologia. Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora
  • Theodoro Weissheimer University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, School of Dentistry, Department of Endodontics
  • Alex Nogueira Haas Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Faculdade de Odontologia. Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora
  • Ricardo Abreu da Rosa Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Faculdade de Odontologia. Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora
  • Gabriel Barcelos Só Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Faculdade de Odontologia. Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora
  • Marcus Vinicius Reis Só Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Faculdade de Odontologia. Departamento de Odontologia Restauradora

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7765-2026-0252

Keywords:

Dental pulp calcification, Meta-analysis, Prevalence, Pulp stones, Systematic review

Abstract

Introduction  Pulp stones are radiopaque calcified masses located within the coronal or radicular pulp tissue. They are typically asymptomatic and detected incidentally on radiographic examination. Global prevalence estimates vary widely, and methodological inconsistencies across studies hinder a comprehensive understanding of their epidemiology. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to answer the following question: “What is the global prevalence of pulp stones, and what factors are associated with their occurrence?” Aim: To systematically review and synthesize the evidence on the global prevalence of pulp stones and to identify factors associated with their occurrence. Methodology  Six electronic databases were searched up to March 2024. Data extraction included participant demographics, diagnostic methods, tooth type, and the presence of systemic diseases. Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI checklist, and prevalence was pooled using random-effects meta-analyses at individual and tooth levels. Meta-regression was performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Results  Twenty-four studies comprising 10,738 individuals and 94,416 teeth met the inclusion criteria. Pulp stones were present in 46% of individuals and 20% of teeth, with substantial heterogeneity across studies. Meta-regression identified systemic conditions and tooth type as significant contributors to prevalence variability. Individuals with both cardiovascular and renal diseases exhibited a higher prevalence (β=0.31, p=0.04), whereas those with cardiovascular diseases alone showed a lower prevalence (β=-0.33, p=0.04) than healthy participants (R2= 26.0). Risk of bias was moderate in most studies, and the overall certainty of evidence was very low.  Conclusion  Pulp stones are highly prevalent, and their occurrence may be influenced by systemic conditions and tooth-related factors. However, these findings are based on very-low-certainty evidence and are limited by heterogeneity and methodological inconsistencies across the included studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1- Ninomiya M, Ohishi M, Kido J, Ohsaki Y, Nagata T. Immunohistochemical localization of osteopontin in human pulp stones. J Endod. 2001;27(4):269-72. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200104000-00007

» https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200104000-00007

2- Zeng J, Yang F, Zhang W, Gong Q, Du Y, Ling J. Association between dental pulp stones and calcifying nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011;6:109-18. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S13267

» https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S13267

3- Goga R, Chandler NP, Oginni AO. Pulp stones: a review. Int Endod J. 2008;41(6):457-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01374.x

» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01374.x

4- Siddiqui SH, Mohamed AN. Calcific metamorphosis: a review. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2016;10(3):437-42. doi: 10.12816/0048738

» https://doi.org/10.12816/0048738

5- Alsweed A, Farah R, Satheeshkumar PS, Farah R. The prevalence and correlation of carotid artery calcifications and dental pulp stones in a Saudi Arabian population. Diseases. 2019;7(3):50. doi: 10.3390/diseases7030050

» https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases7030050

6- Kaabi HH, Riyahi AM, Al-Maflehi NS, Alrumayyan SF, Bakrman AK, Almutaw YA. Three-dimensional analysis for detection of pulp stones in a Saudi population using cone-beam computed tomography. J Oral Sci. 2023;65(4):257-60. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.23-0091

» https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.23-0091

7- Bergmann S. Simulated major trifacial neuralgia caused by pulp stones: report of a case. J Am Dent Assoc. 1943;30(9):701-3.

8- Almadhoon HW, Al-Kafarna M, Asla MM, Gbreel MI, Abd Allah MA, Almotairy N. The association of dental pulp stones to cardiovascular and renal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2022;48(7):845-54. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.02.010

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2022.02.010

9- Parashar SR, Kasabwala K, Ulaganathan S, Suresh M, Sirohi R, Patil S. Association of pulp calcifications and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022;22(2):101707. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101707

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101707

10- Vieira WA, Paranhos LR, Meneses-Santos D, Pereira JF, Moura AP, Silva JC, et al. Association between the prevalence of pulp stones and calcified atherosclerotic plaques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023;52(4):20230004. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20230004

» https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20230004

11- Hasan S, Sharma T, Saeed S, Kaur M, Gombra V, Masood R. Prevalence of pulp stones on panoramic radiographs in patients with chronic systemic diseases: a cross-sectional study. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2025;16(4):e0022. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10557

» https://doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10557

12- Gabardo MC, Wambier LM, Rocha JS, Kuchler EC, de Lara RM, Leonardi DP, et al. Association between pulp stones and kidney stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2019;45(9):1099-105.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.06.006

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.06.006

13- Jannati R, Afshari M, Moosazadeh M, Allahgholipour SZ, Eidy M, Hajihoseini M. Prevalence of pulp stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Med. 2019;12(2):133-9. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12331

» https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12331

14- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;118:60-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.010

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.11.010

15- Munn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Jordan Z. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4

» https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4

16- Munn Z, Moola S, Lisy K, Riitano D, Tufanaru C. Chapter 5: systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. Adelaide: JBI; 2020.

17- Munn Z, Moola S, Lisy K, Riitano D, Tufanaru C. Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational studies reporting prevalence data. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):147-53. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000054

» https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000054

18- Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026

19- Alaajam WH, Saleh AA, Alghamdi NS, Ain TS, Algarni YA, Abubaker M. Incidence and distribution of pulp stones among Southern Saudi Arabian sub-population. SAGE Open Med. 2021;9:20503121211062796. doi: 10.1177/20503121211062796

» https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121211062796

20- Alqahtani AS. Prevalence and association of calcified pulp stones with periodontitis: a cone-beam computed tomography study in Saudi Arabian population. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 1):S644-50. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_913_23

» https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_913_23

21- Bains SK, Bhatia A, Singh HP, Biswal SS, Kanth S, Nalla S. Prevalence of coronal pulp stones and its relation with systemic disorders in northern Indian central Punjabi population. ISRN Dent. 2014;2014:617590. doi: 10.1155/2014/617590

» https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/617590

22- Calero-Hinostroza GG, Tinedo-López PL, García-Rupaya CR. Prevalencia y distribución de cálculos pulpares en un grupo de adultos peruanos: un estudio mediante tomografías de haz cónico. Odovtos Int J Dent Sci. 2021;23(2):161-70. Spanish. doi: 10.15517/ijds.2021.44468

» https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2021.44468

23- Silva EJ, Prado MC, Queiroz PM, Nejaim Y, Brasil DM, Groppo FC, et al. Assessing pulp stones by cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(7):2327-33. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-2027-5

» https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-2027-5

24- Tarim Ertas E, Inci M, Demirtas A, Ertas H, Yengil E, Sisman Y, et al. A radiographic correlation between renal and pulp stones. West Indian Med J. 2014;63(6):620-5. doi: 10.7727/wimj.2013.077

» https://doi.org/10.7727/wimj.2013.077

25- Ezoddini-Ardakani F, Namayandeh SM, Sadr-Bafghi SM, Fatehi F, Mohammadi Z, Shahrabi-Farahani S, et al. Association of pulp stones with coronary artery stenosis. Community Dent Health. 2011;28(4):305-7.

26- Gulsahi A, Cebeci AI, Ozden S. A radiographic assessment of the prevalence of pulp stones in a group of Turkish dental patients. Int Endod J. 2009;42(8):735-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01580.x

» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01580.x

27- al-Hadi Hamasha A, Darwazeh A. Prevalence of pulp stones in Jordanian adults. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998;86(6):730-2. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90212-8

» https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90212-8

28- Ivanauskaite D, Kubiliute D, Janaviciene D, Brukiene V. Prevalence of pulp stones in molars based on bitewing and periapical radiographs. Stomatologija. 2021;23(1):9-15.

29- Sönmez Kaplan S, Kaplan T, Sezgin GP. Assessment of the frequency and correlation of carotid artery calcifications and pulp stones with idiopathic osteosclerosis using digital panoramic radiographs. Clin Exp Health Sci. 2021;11(2):342-7. doi: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.841006

» https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.841006

30- Kenawi LM, Jaha HS, Alzahrani MM, Alharbi JI, Alharbi SF, Almuqati TA, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography-based investigation of the prevalence and distribution of pulp stones and their relation to local and systemic factors in the Makkah population: a cross-sectional study. Cureus. 2024;16(1):e51633. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51633

» https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.51633

31- Mahajan B, Ettishree, Anjum R, Chhibber N. Presence of pulp stones and its relation with systemic disorders. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2023;14(5):2077-80. https://doi.org/10.48047/

» https://doi.org/10.48047/

32- Mirah MA, Bafail A, Shaheen S, Baik A, Abu Zaid B, Alharbi A, et al. Assessment of pulp stones among western Saudi populations: a cross-sectional study. Cureus. 2023;15(9):e46056. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46056

» https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.46056

33- Maranhão de Moura AA, de Paiva JG. Pulpal calcifications in patients with coronary atherosclerosis. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1987;3(6):307-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1987.tb00640.x

» https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1987.tb00640.x

34- Patil SR, Ghani HA, Almuhaiza M, Al-Zoubi IA, Anil KN, Misra N, et al. Prevalence of pulp stones in a Saudi Arabian subpopulation: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Saudi Endod J. 2018;8(2):93-8. doi: 10.4103/sej.sej_32_17

» https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_32_17

35- Ravanshad S, Khayat S, Freidonpour N. The prevalence of pulp stones in adult patients of Shiraz Dental School: a radiographic assessment. J Dent (Shiraz). 2015;16(4):356-61.

36- Sezgin GP, Sönmez Kaplan S, Kaplan T. Evaluation of the relation between the pulp stones and direct restorations using cone beam computed tomography in a Turkish subpopulation. Restor Dent Endod. 2021;46(3):e34. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e34

» https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e34

37- Srivastava KC, Shrivastava D, Nagarajappa AK, Khan ZA, Alzoubi IA, Mousa MA, et al. Assessing the prevalence and association of pulp stones with cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus in the Saudi Arabian population: a CBCT based study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(24):9293. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249293

» https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249293

38- Tassoker M, Magat G, Sener S. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and digital panoramic radiography for detecting pulp stones. Imaging Sci Dent. 2018;48(3):201-12. doi: 10.5624/isd.2018.48.3.201

» https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2018.48.3.201

39- Yeluri G, Kumar CA, Raghav N. Correlation of dental pulp stones, carotid artery and renal calcifications using digital panoramic radiography and ultrasonography. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015;6(Suppl 1):S147-51. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.166837

» https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.166837

40- Gunen Yilmaz S, Yilmaz F, Bayrakdar IS, Harorli A. The relationship between carotid artery calcification and pulp stone among hemodialysis patients: a retrospective study. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2019;30(4):755-63. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.265449

» https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-2442.265449

41- Moe SM, Chen NX. Pathophysiology of vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease. Circ Res. 2004;95(6):560-7. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000141775.67189.98

» https://doi.org/10.1161/01.RES.0000141775.67189.98

42- Sener S, Cobankara FK, Akgünlü F. Calcifications of the pulp chamber: prevalence and implicated factors. Clin Oral Investig. 2009;13(2):209-15. doi: 10.1007/s00784-008-0219-x

» https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0219-x

43- Sangalli L, Souza LC, Letra A, Shaddox L, Ioannidou E. Sex as a biological variable in oral diseases: evidence and future prospects. J Dent Res. 2023;102(13):1395-416. doi: 10.1177/00220345231197143

» https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345231197143

44- Dutra KL, Haas L, Porporatti AL, Flores-Mir C, Nascimento Santos J, Mezzomo LA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional radiography on apical periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2016;42(3):35-64. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.015

» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.12.015

45- Patel S, Brown J, Pimentel T, Kelly RD, Abella F, Durack C. Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics: a review of the literature. Int Endod J. 2019;52(8):1138-52. doi: 10.1111/iej.13115

» https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13115

Downloads

Published

2026-08-03

Issue

Section

Systematic Review

How to Cite

Sanches, Y. A., Weissheimer, T., Alex Nogueira Haas, Rosa, R. A. da, Só, G. B., & Só, M. V. R. (2026). Prevalence and factors associated with pulp stones: a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. Journal of Applied Oral Science, 34, e20260252. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7765-2026-0252