Use of base metal casting alloys for implant framework: marginal accuracy analysis

Authors

  • Stefania Carvalho Kano University of São Paulo; Bauru Dental School; Department of Prosthodontics
  • Gerson Bonfante University of São Paulo; Bauru Dental School; Department of Prosthodontics
  • Raquel Hussne University of São Paulo; Hospital of Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies
  • Aline F. Siqueira Federal University of Santa Catarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572004000400016

Keywords:

Implant prosthesis, Alloys^i1^smis

Abstract

The original protocol for implant prosthesis recommends the use of a gold framework for acrylic and ceramic prosthesis. However, due to its high cost, the use of alternative alloys is desired. This study compares the marginal accuracy of pre-made cylinders versus plastic cylinders cast with two different base metal casting alloys. Five samples each of (1) plastic cylinder cast in cobalt-chromium alloy, (2) plastic cylinder cast in nickel-chromium alloy, and (3) silver-palladium pre-made cylinder (control) were examined for marginal accuracy according to: (A) vertical gap; (B) horizontal gap and (C) horizontal gap depth at the abutment/cylinder interface. Data were submitted to statistical analysis (ANOVA and Student-Newman Keuls, p<0.05). Mean values for vertical, horizontal and gap depth were 4.13µm, 14.5µm and 6.93µm for pre-made cylinder, 23.18µm, 33.2µm and 88µm for Ni-Cr cast cylinder and 25.6µm, 51.8µm and 114.54µm for Co-Cr cast cylinder. No statistically significant differences were found between cast groups (1 and 2), but significant better fit was obtained with pre-made metal cylinders when compared to cast cylinders with Ni-Cr and Co-Cr alloys, for all analyses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2004-12-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Kano, S. C., Bonfante, G., Hussne, R., & Siqueira, A. F. (2004). Use of base metal casting alloys for implant framework: marginal accuracy analysis . Journal of Applied Oral Science, 12(4), 337-343. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572004000400016