In vitro evaluation of the marginal microleakage of amalgam restorations associated with dentin adhesive, glass ionomer cement and cavity varnish by means of different evaluation methods

Authors

  • Adriano Tomio Hoshi UNIOESTE; Department of Pediatric Dentistry
  • Salete Moura Bonifácio da Silva USP; Bauru Dental School; Department of Pediatric Dentistry
  • Aymar Pavarini USP; Bauru Dental School; Department of Pediatric Dentistry

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572005000100003

Keywords:

Dental materials, Marginal microleakage

Abstract

This in vitro study evaluated the marginal microleakage of amalgam restorations associated with the cavity varnish Copalite - Cooley & Cooley (GI-CP), dentin adhesive OptiBond Solo - Kerr (GII-OS) and the glass ionomer cement Vitremer - 3M (GIII-VT). Forty-five premolars were employed, which were submitted to independent class II preparations at the mesial and distal aspects comprising the marginal ridges and were restored with Dispersalloy - Dentsply. Afterwards, the teeth were thermocycled and stored in 0.5% basic fuchsine for 24 hours. The evaluations were conducted on a light microscope with 150x magnification and on the Sigma Scan software with employment of a single line and segmented lines. Data analysis allowed to establish that none of the materials was able to eliminate the marginal microleakage, having the GI - CP presented greater and statistically significant values in relation to the other groups in all evaluation methods (p<0.05). The lowest values were displayed by the GIII-VT, yet with no statistically significant difference when compared to GII-OS, except for the evaluation at the Sigma Scan in single line. The three evaluation methods showed a strong positive relationship to each other.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2005-03-01

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

In vitro evaluation of the marginal microleakage of amalgam restorations associated with dentin adhesive, glass ionomer cement and cavity varnish by means of different evaluation methods . (2005). Journal of Applied Oral Science, 13(1), 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572005000100003