Effect of different prophylaxis methods on sound and demineralized enamel

Authors

  • Heitor Marques Honório Bauru Dental School
  • Daniela Rios Superior Teaching Center of Maringá
  • Ruy César Camargo Abdo Bauru Dental School
  • Maria Aparecida de Andrade Moreira Machado Bauru Dental School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572006000200010

Keywords:

Dental prophylaxis, Dental enamel, wear

Abstract

Considering the importance of professional plaque control for caries prevention, this study comprised an in vitro evaluation of wear by two prophylaxis methods (sodium bicarbonate jet - Profident and pumice and brush) on sound bovine enamel and with artificial carious lesions. Sixty enamel fragments were employed (4x4mm), which were divided into 4 groups: GI - 15 sound blocks treated with pumice and brush; GII - 15 sound blocks treated with Profident; GIII - 15 demineralized blocks treated with pumice and brush, and GIV - 15 demineralized blocks treated with Profident. In the fragments of Groups III and IV, artificial carious lesions were simulated by immersion in 0.05M acetic acid solution 50% saturated with bovine enamel powder at 37ºC for 16h. The specimens were submitted to the prophylactic treatments for 10 seconds. Wear analysis was performed by profilometer and revealed the following results: 0.91µm - GI; 0.42µm - GII; 1.6µm - GIII, and 0.94µm - GIV. The two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05) revealed significant difference between all groups. Scanning electron microscopy images were employed to illustrate the wear pattern, with observation of larger alteration on the demineralized enamel surface (GIII; GIV), round-shaped wear on GI and GIII and blasted aspect on GII and GIV. The study indicated that the demineralized enamel presented more wear than the sound enamel, and the brush led to larger wear when compared to Profident.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2006-04-01

Issue

Section

nd

How to Cite

Honório, H. M., Rios, D., Abdo, R. C. C., & Machado, M. A. de A. M. (2006). Effect of different prophylaxis methods on sound and demineralized enamel . Journal of Applied Oral Science, 14(2), 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572006000200010