Factors associated with the development of preterm children at four and eight months of corrected gestational age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.110024Palavras-chave:
Premature. Child development. Risk factors.Resumo
Introduction: The big advances in perinatal care have resulted in longer survival of newborns with lower birth weight. However, these children are at high risk for developmental alterations. Objective: To analyse the relationship between perinatal variables and the overall development of premature infants at four and eight months of corrected age. Method: Longitudinal prospective cohort study where 91 preterm infants with gestational age at or below 34 weeks were followed. The children were evaluated at four and eight months of age by cognitive scales of motor and language with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development III. Results: Birth weight and bronchopulmonary dysplasia were identified as factors for the permanence in the delayed of overall development. The intervention, after routing, was identified as a factor in the improvement effort. Conclusion: Birth weight below 1,000g and bronchopulmonary dysplasia were the main predictive factors for developmental delay. Systematic intervention was a predictive factor for improvement in development.
Downloads
Referências
Borba GG, Neves ET, Arrué AM, Silveira A, Zamberlan KC. Fatores associados à morbimortalidade neonatal: um estudo de revisão. Rev Saúde. 2014;40(1):9-16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/223658347774
Wilson-Costello D, Friedman H, Minich N, Siner B, Taylor G, Schluchter M, et al. Improved neurodevelopmental outcomes for extremely low birth weight infants in 2000-2002. Pediatrics. 2007; 119(1):37-45. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-1416
Silva J, Fronio JS, Lemos RA, Ribeiro LC, Aguiar TS, Silva TD, et al. Oportunidades de estimulação no domicílio e habilidade funcional de crianças com potenciais alterações no desenvolvimento. J Human Growth Dev. 2015;25(1):19-26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.96763
Moster D, Lie RT, Markestad T. Long-term medical and social consequences of preterm birth. N Engl J Med. 2008;359: 262-73. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0706475
Martinez CMS, Joaquim RHVT, Oliveira EB, Santos IC. Suporte informacional como elemento para orientação de pais de pré-termo: um guia para o serviço de acompanhamento do desenvolvimento no primeiro ano de vida. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2007;11(1):73-81. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552007000100012
Bayley N. Bayley scales of infant and toddler development. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 2006; p. 266.
Houtzager BA, Gorter-Overdiek B, Van Sonderen L, Tamminga P, Van Wassenaer AG. Improvement of developmental outcome between 24 and 36 months corrected age in very preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99(12):1801-6. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01953.x
Claas MJ, Bruinse HW, Koopman C, van Haastert IC, Peelen LM, de Vries LS. Two-year neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm born children ≤ 750 g at birth. .Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011; 96(3):F169-77. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2009.174433
Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, Mor J, Kogan M. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 87(2):163-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0029-7844(95)00386-X
Jobe AH, Bancalari E. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163(7):1723-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.2011060
Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa (ABEP). Critério de classificação econômica no Brasil, 2008. [cited 2010 Aug 07] Available from: http://www.abep.org/novo/Content.aspx?ContentID=302.
De Kieviet JF, Piek JP, Aarnoudse-Moens CS, Oosterlaan J. Motor development in very preterm and very low-birth-weight children from birth to adolescence: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009; 302(20):2235-42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1708
Martins PS, Mello RR, Silva KS. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia as a predictor factor for motor alteration at 6 months corrected age in premature infants. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2010;68(5):749-54. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2010000500014
Natarajan G, Pappas A, Shankaran S, Kendrick DE, Das A, Higgins RD, et al. Outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: Impact of the physiologic definition. Early Hum Dev. 2012; 88(7):509-15. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.12.013
Araújo ATC, Eickmann SH, Coutinho SB. Fatores associados ao atraso do desenvolvimento motor de crianças prematuras internadas em unidade de neonatologia. Rev Bras Saúde Matern Infant. 2013;13(2):119-28. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-38292013000200005
Spittle AJ, Doyle LW, Boyd RN. A systematic review of the clinimetric properties of neuromotor assessments for preterm infants during the first year of life. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(4):254-66. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.02025.x.
Blauw-Hospers CH, Hadders-Algra M.. A systematic review of the effects of early intervention on motor development. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005; 47(6):421-32.
Nordhov SM, Rønning JA, Ulvund SE, Dahl LB, Kaaresen PI. Randomized controlled trial early intervention improves behavioral outcomes for preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2012;129(1): e9-e16. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-0248
Anderson V, Spencer-Smith M, Wood A. Do children really recover better? Neurobehavioural plasticity after early brain insult. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 8):2197-221. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr103
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis