Concurrent validation of the MABC-2 and Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire-BR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.110421Palavras-chave:
Validation. MABC-2. DCDQ-BR. Motor performance.Resumo
Introduction: The Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition (MABC-2) has been widely used in national literature for the diagnosis of Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD). The relationship of MABC-2 with the scientific gold standard instrument for DCD, the Brazilian version of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCDQ-BR), is not well established and is rather controversial. Objective: The aim of this study was to verify the concurrent validity of the MABC-2 motor battery and the DCDQ-BR, controlled for sex and age group. Method: The concurrent validation process took place with the participation of 350 schoolchildren aged 7–11 years from the cities of Florianopolis-SC and Manaus-AM and their parents or guardians. The agreement between instruments was assessed with the Spearman correlation test and simple linear regression using SPSS software version 20.0. Results: Positive correlation between instruments´ scales was found. Conclusion: This study showed evidence of concurrent validity between MABC-2 and DCDQ-BR, suggesting that MABC-2 can be used as an indicator for developmental coordination disorder.Downloads
Referências
King‐Dowling S, Rodriguez MC, Missiuna C, Cairney J. Validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire to detect risk of Developmental Coordination Disorder in preschoolers. Child: Care, Health Dev. 2015;1-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cch.12314
Caçola P, Romero H, Ibana H, Chuang J. Effects of two distinct group motor skill interventions in psychological and motor skills of children with Developmental Coordination Disorder: A pilot study. Disabil Health J. 2015;9(1):172-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.07.007
Miranda TB, Beltrame TS, Cardoso FL. Desempenho motor e estado nutricional de escolares com e sem transtorno do desenvolvimento da coordenação. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2011;13(1):59-66. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2011v13n1p59
Santos VAP, Vieria JLL. Prevalência de desordem coordenativa desenvolvimental em crianças com 7 a 10 anos de idade. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2013;15(2):233-42. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2013v15n2p233
Silva J, Beltrame TS. Indicativo de transtorno do desenvolvimento da coordenação de escolares com idade entre 7 e 10 anos. Rev Bras Ciênc Esporte. 2013; 35(1):3-14. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-32892013000100002
Nascimento EMF, Contreira AR, Silva EVA, Souza LPD, Beltrame TS. Desempenho motor e estado nutricional em escolares com transtorno do déficit de atenção e hiperatividade. J Hum Growth Dev. 2013;23(3):358-64. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.69514
Silva J, Beltrame TS, Oliveira ADVPD, Sperandio FF. Dificuldade motoras e de aprendizagem em crianças com baixo desempenho escolar. J Hum Growth Dev. 2012; 22(1):41-46.
Engel-Yeger B, Hanna KA. The relationship between Developmental Co-ordination Disorders, child’s perceived self-efficacy and preference to participate in daily activities. Child: Care, Health Dev. 2010; 6(5):670-7. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01073.x
Jarus T, Lourie-Gelberg Y, Engel-Yeger B, Bart O. Participation patterns of school-aged children with and without DCD. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(4): 1323-31. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.033
Liu T, Breslin CM. The Effect of a Picture Activity Schedule on Performance of the MABC–2 for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013;84(2):206-12. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2013.784725
Henderson SE, Sugden DA, Barnett A. Moviment Assessment Battery for Children-2 (2nd ed). London: The Psychological Corporation; 2007.
Wilson B, Dewey D, Campbell A. Developmental coordination disorder questionnaire (DCDQ). Canada: Alberta Children's Hospital Research Center; 1998.
Civetta LR, Hillier SL. The developmental coordination disorder questionnaire and movement assessment battery for children as a diagnostic method in Australian children. Pediatr Phys Ther . 2008;20(1): 39-46. http://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e31815ccaeb
Tseng MH, Fu CP, Wilson BN, Hu FC. Psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the developmental coordination disorder questionnaire in community-based children. Res Dev Disabil. 2010;31(1):33-45. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2009.07.018
Kennedy-Behr A, Wilson BN, Rodger S, Mickan S. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire for brazilian children. Neuropediatrics. 2013; 44(5): 245-51. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1347936
Traub R, Levi A, Parush S. Validity and reliability of the developmental coordination disorder questionnaire for school-aged children in Israel. Isr J Occup Ther. 2005; 14(4): H175-91.
Nakai A, Miyachi T, Okada R, Tani I, Nakajima S, Onishi M, et al. Evaluation of the Japanese version of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire as a screening tool for clumsiness of Japanese children. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(5):1615-22. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.012
Prado MS, Magalhães LC, Wilson BN. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire for brazilian children. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2009;13(3):236-43. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552009005000024
Capistrano R, Ferrari EP, Souza LP, Beltrame TS, Cardoso FL. Concurrent validation of the MABC-2 Motor Tests and MABC-2 Checklist according to the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire-BR. Motriz: Rev Educ Fis. 2015;.21(1):100-106. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1980-65742015000100013
Schoemaker MM, Flapper B, Verheij NP, Wilson BN, Reinders-Messelink H, Kloet A. Evaluation of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire as a screening instrument. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(8):668-73. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/S001216220600140X
Henderson S, Sugden D. Movement Assessment Battery for Children- MABC. London: The Psychological Corporation; 1992.
Pannekoek L, Rigoli D, Piek JB, Barret NC, Schoemaker M. The revised DCDQ: Is it a suitable screening measure for motor difficulties in adolescentes. Adap Phys Activ Q. 2012;29(1):81-97.
Zwicker JG, Missiuma C, Harris SR, Boyd LA. Developmental coordination disorder: a review and update. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2012; 16(6):573-81. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2012.05.005
Gibbs J, Appleton J, Appleton R. Dyspraxia or developmental coordination disorder? Unravelling the enigma. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92(6):534-9. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2005.088054
Green D, Lingam R, Mattocks C, Riddoch C, Ness A, Emond A. The risk of reduced physical acti¬vity in children with probable Developmental Coor-dination Disorder: a prospective longitudinal study. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(4):1332-42. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.040.
Cardoso AA, Magalhães LC, Rezende MB. Motor skills in Brazilian children with developmental coordination disorder versus children with motor typical development. Occup Ther Int. 2014;21(4):176-85. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/oti.1376
Pasquali L. Psychometrics. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2009;43(Spe): 992-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0080-62342009000500002
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis