Communicative indicators, motor and cognitive development of hearing-impaired children

Autores

  • Érica Endo Amemiya Msc. and Speech pathologist. Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP) - São Paulo
  • Alexandra Dezani Soares Phd. and Speech pathologist. Speech pathologist in the Cochlear Implant Team - HSP- UNIFESP
  • Brasilia Maria Chiari Phd. Professor at the Department of Phonoaudiology (Speech Pathology) - UNIFESP - São Paulo.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.113717

Palavras-chave:

Hearing loss. Child development. Language development disorders.

Resumo

Introduction: For the assessment of child development in the deaf is effective protocols are needed for this population, as in Brazil, standardized tests for these children are still scarce 4.5. Thus, emphasis is placed on studying child development in deaf so that therapeutic and educational approaches are contemplated in accordance with the needs of each child. Objective:  Analyze the performance of children with hearing defi cit in different areas: Communications-Issue, Communication-reception, aspects Motors and Cognitive Aspects of Language. Methods: We have carried out a comparative study in an institutional clinic with 109 children, divided into 60 hearing individuals with typical development and 49 with hearing loss, severe to profound. The performance index was calculated for each child in these four domains. The index was analysed according to the equation: (number of responses in each area / number of assessed behaviours) x100. Results: In all age groups, hearing-impaired children had a smaller performance when compared to hearing children in the Communication – Emission domain. The Communication-Reception domain showed signifi cant differences (p < 0.05) from the 12-to-23-months to the 60-to-71-months age groups. The Cognitive Aspects domain demonstrated a signifi cant difference (p < 0.01) between hearing-impaired and hearing children aged 24 to 35 months and onwards. Motor Aspects only had a signifi cant difference (p < 0.01) in the last two age groups, 48-59 months and 60-71 months. The signifi cance level was 5%. Conclusion:  In all age groups, hearing-impaired children’s performance was worse when compared to hearing children. The intervention made by health professionals ought to take place as soon as possible in order to develop the cognitive, motor and language skills of the hearing-impaired child.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Kandel ER. Uma visão global. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessel TM. Fundamentos da neurociência e do comportamento. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 1997; p.505-6.

Soares AD, Chiari BM. Caracterização da narrativa oral de deficientes auditivos. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2006;11(4):272-8.

Costa MCM, Chiari BM. Verificação do desempenho de crianças deficientes auditivas oralizadas em teste de vocabulário. Pró-Fono R Atual Cient. 2006;18(2):189-96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-56872006000200008

Chiari BM, Basilio CS, Nakagawa EA, Cormedi MA, Silva NSM, Cardoso RM, et al. Proposta de sistematização de dados da avaliação fonoaudiológica através da observação de comportamentos de criança de 0 a 6 anos. Pró-Fono R Atual Cient. 1991;3(2):29-36.

Sandri MA, Meneghetti SL, Gomes E. Perfil comunicativo de crianças entre 1 e 3 anos com desenvolvimento normal de linguagem. Rev CEFAC. 2009;11(1):34-41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462009000100006

World Health Organization (WHO). Deafnes and Hearing loss. 2015. [Cited 2015 sep 02] Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs300/en/

Schirmer CR, Fontoura DR, Nunes ML. Language and learning disorders. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2004;80(2 Suppl.0):S95-103. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0021-75572004000300012

Lyxell B, Wass M, Sahlén B, Samuelsson C, Asker-Arnason L, Ibertsson T, et al. Cognitive development, reading and prosodic skills in children with cochlear implants. Scand J Psychol. 2009;50(5):463-74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00754.x

Nikolopoulos TP, Vlastarakos PV. Treating options for deaf children. Early Hum Dev. 2010;86(11):669-74. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.10.001

Vohr B, Jodoin-Krauzyk J, Tucker R, Johnson MJ, Topol D, Ahlgren M. Early language outcomes of early-identified infants with permanent hearing loss at 12 to 16 months of age. Pediatrics. 2008;122(3):535-44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-2028

Moeller MP, Hoover B, Putman C, Arbataitis K, Bohnenkamp G, Peterson B, et al. Vocalizations of infants with hearing loss compared with infants with normal hearing: Part I- phonetic development. Ear Hear. 2007;28(5):605-27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812564ab

Alzahrani M, Tabet P, Saliba I. Pediatric hearing loss: common causes,diagnosis and therapeutic approach. Minerva Pediatr. 2015;67(1):75-90.

Barnard JM, Fisher LM, Johnson KC, Eisenberg LS, Wang NY, Quittner AL, et al. A Prospective Longitudinal Study of U.S. Children Unable to Achieve Open-Set Speech Recognition 5 Years After Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36(6):985-92. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000723

Fortunato CAU, Bevilacqua MC, Costa MPR. Análise comparativa da linguagem oral de crianças ouvintes e surdas usuárias de implante coclear. Rev CEFAC. 2009;11(4):662-72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462009000800015

Sarant JZ, Holt CM, Dowell RC, Rickards FW, Blamey PJ. Spoken language development in oral preschool children with permanent childhood deafness. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2009;14(2):205-17. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enn034

McCann DC, Worsfold S, Law CM, Mullee M, Petrou S, Stevenson J, et al. Reading and communication skills after universal newborn screening for permanent childhood hearing impairment. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94(4):293-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.2008.151217

Gândara JP, Befi-Lopes DM. Tendências da aquisição lexical em crianças em desenvolvimento normal e crianças com alterações específicas no desenvolvimento da linguagem. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2010;15(2):297-304. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342010000200024

Kane MO, Schopmeyer B, Mellon NK, Wang NY, Niparko JK. Prelinguistic communication and subsequent language acquisition in children with cochlear implants. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(5):619-23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archotol.130.5.619

Sharma A, Gilley PM, Dorman MF, Baldwin R. Deprivation-induced cortical reorganization in children with cochlear implants. Int J Audiol. 2007;46(9):494-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14992020701524836

Holzinger D, Fellinger J, Beitel C. Early onset of family centred intervention predicts language outcomes in children with hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;75(2):256-60. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.11.011

Wiegersma PH, Van der Velde A. Motor development of deaf children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1983;24(1):103-11.

Yoon PJ. Hearing loss and cochlear implantation in children. Adv Pediatr. 2011;58(1):277-96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yapd.2011.03.013

Downloads

Publicado

2016-04-28

Edição

v. 26 n. 1 (2016)

Seção

Artigos Originais

Licença

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis