Nutrir resiliência: a “magia comum” da vida cotidiana

Autores

  • Ảine de Roiste Institute of Technology Bishopstown, Cork

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.152175

Palavras-chave:

resiliência, competência em risco, desenvolvimento infantil

Resumo

Apresentamos uma breve exploração da resiliência e o desenvolvimento infantil neste estudo. Os conceitos de resiliência e "competência de risco" são elaborados juntamente com algumas das implicações práticas destes em relação ao cuidado e bem-estar da criança. Algumas questões são levantadas em relação ao cuidado e dos riscos na infância e, ao mesmo tempo, permite que as crianças sejam capazes de avaliar e lidar com os riscos por si mesmas.

 

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Ảine de Roiste, Institute of Technology Bishopstown, Cork

     Senior Lecturer, Department of Applied Social Studies,

     Ảine is a psychologist, lecturer and course co-ordinator on the BA (Hons) in Social Care and supervises postgraduate research in this field.

Referências

Downloads

Publicado

2018-11-28

Edição

v. 28 n. 3 (2018)

Seção

Artigos Originais

Licença

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis