A UTILIZAÇÃO DOS ORGANIZADORES DA PSIQUÊ DE SPITZ COMO INSTRUMENTO DE ACOMPANHAMENTO DO DESENVOLVIMENTO DE CRIANÇAS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.37425Resumo
O presente trabalho é resultado de um estudo longitudinal que acompanhou 60 crianças por um período de 12 meses. Esse estudo buscou testar alguns indicadores do desenvolvimento infantil, dentre eles os organizadores da psique de Spitz.O que se pode observar com o presente estudo foi a dificuldade de delimitação conceitual dos orga^Iiizadores, acarretando dificuldades de observação em situação
natural; bem como a plasticidade etária no aparec~nento das reações indicativas de cada orgariizador. Concluem os autores que a reação do sornso, o medo de estranhos e o meneio negativo da cabeça sôo indicadores ricos do ponto de vista teórico, porém pouco sensíveis como instrumento de acompanhamento do desenvolvimento infantil.
Downloads
Publicado
1991-12-19
Edição
Seção
Resultado de Pesquisa
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis