Atribuição de nomes próprios e seu papel no desenvolvimento segundo o relato dos nomeados

Autores

  • Elaine Pedreira Rabinovich
  • Daniela Trovaglini
  • Anna Crisíina Pereira Hulle Coser
  • Eloane Neves Esteves

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.37705

Palavras-chave:

nomes próprios, nomeação.

Resumo

O presente estudo replica e amplia a pesquisa anteriormente realizada por Rabinovich et al (191), sobre o processo de nomeação de crianças tendo como base agora a fala de sujeitos adultos sobre o próprio nome. As categorias ptopostas foram validadas e ampliadas. Concluiu-se que o nome, enquanto “script” outorgado pelos pais, indica, entre outros fatores, o futuro papel do nomeado no seu contexto familiar e social, sendo essa influência, em grande parte, desconhecida do nomeado.

Biografia do Autor

  • Elaine Pedreira Rabinovich
    Psicologa Clínica, Mestre em Psicologia, pesquisadora do CDH e bolsista CAPES
  • Daniela Trovaglini
    Aluno do lnstituto de Psicologia/USP
  • Anna Crisíina Pereira Hulle Coser
    Aluno do lnstituto de Psicologia/USP
  • Eloane Neves Esteves
    Aluno do lnstituto de Psicologia/USP

Referências

Abraham K. Sobre el poder determinante de los nombres. In: Estudios sobre Psicanálise y Psiquiatria. Ed. Horme, Buenos Aires. 1961.p. 29-30.

Aspey WP. Wolf Spider Sociobiology: Agonistic Display and Dominance Sub ordinance Relalions in Adult Male. Scbizocosa Crassipes. Behavior. LXII: 103-141, 1977.

AndersonT, Schmitt PR. Unique First Names in Male and Female Psychiatric Patients. Journal of Social Psychology. 130(6): 835-837, 1989.

Berenstein L. Família e doença mental. Editora Escuta, São Paulo, 1988.

Chevalier J, Gheerbrant A. Dicionário de Símbolos. 4ª edição, José Olímpio Editora, Rio de Janeiro, 1991.

Eagleson OW. Students’s reactions to their given-names. Journal of Social Psychology,223: 187-195, 1946.

Hartman AA, Nicolay RC, Huri EYJ. Unique Personal Names as a social adjustment factor. Journal of Social Psychology, 76:107-110, 1968.

Koskas A. Un prénom et un nom pour écrireun corps. 1985. [Comunicado particular].

Marcus MG. The Power of a Name. Psychology Today. October 1976, p. 75-76.

Martins F. O nome próprio. Univcrsidade de Brasília, Brasília, 1991.

Rabinovich EP et al. Atribuição dos nomes próprios de neonatos. Boletim de Psicologia XLI (94/95), Jan - Dez/ 1991.

Savage BM, Wells FLA. Note on Singularity on Given Names. Journal of Social Psychology, 27: 271-272, 1948.

Schomberg BM, Murphy DM. The Relantionship Between the Uniqueness of Given Name and Personality. Journal of Social Psychology, 93:147, 1974.

Zweigenhaft RL, Hayes KN, Haagen CH. The Psychological Impact of Names. Journal of Social Psychology. 110:203-210, 1980.

Volpi AJ. Edipo, psicodrama do deslino. Agora. São Paulo, 1990.

Downloads

Publicado

1993-12-19

Edição

v. 3 n. 2 (1993)

Seção

Estudo de Caso

Licença

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL  PUBLISHERS

 

Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:

 

Publishers should:

 

  • Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
  • Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
  • Protect intellectual property and copyright
  • Foster editorial independence

 

Publishers should work with journal editors to:

 

  • Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:

–         Editorial  independence

–         Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research

–         Authorship

–         Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards

–         Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor

–         Appeals and complaints

  • Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
  • Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
  • Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
  • Maintain the integrity of the academic record
  • Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
  • Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
  • Publish content on a timely basis