O impacto psicológico da violência e do abuso nas vidas de crianças de rua no Srilanka
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.39634Palavras-chave:
crianças de rua, violência, abuso, Sri Lanka.Resumo
Crianças de rua do Sri Lanka, entre as idades de 5 e 11 anos, foram avaliadas psicologicamente quanto ao impacto da violência e de abuso, testando-se a quantidade de: agressão percebida; habilidades de enfrentamento; e impacto do abuso. Os resultados indicaram que as crianças mais novas manifestaram mais agressão do que as mais velhas e que os meninos eram mais agressivos do que as meninas. Esta agressão ocorreu principalmente ante a condição de abuso sexual. As crianças mais velhas pareceram ser capazes de um enfrentamento melhor do que as menores sendo que, as meninas, em geral, estavam mais capacitadas para o enfrentamento do que os meninos. O impacto psicológico do abuso pareceu ser mais grave quando sob as formas de depressão e de pensamentos suicidas. Muitas crianças sentiam que o abusado se tornaria um abusador ou um criminoso. Estes dados tem conseqüências de grande alcance em um país menos industrializado, como o Sri Lanka, embora esta influência seja principalmente um resultado da industrialização urbana.Downloads
Referências
Arimpoor J. C. Street children of Madras. Ghaziabad, National Labour Institute,1992.(Child labour cell).
Broota KD. Experimental design in behavioural research. New Delhi, Wiley Eastern Press, 1989.
Browne O, Finke O. Street children: an urban phenomena. In: Selected papers in child exploitation and abuse. The report of the fourth Asian conference on child exploitation and abuse. Calcutta, India, 1989.
Cattanach A. Play therapy with abused children. In: Kedar ND, Verna V.(Eds.). How and why children hate. A study of conscious and unconscious sources. London, Briddles Ltda. Guilford and Kings, Lynn,1993.
Deaux D. Development of sex related to differences and gender roles. In: Berk LE. Child development. Massachusetts, Allyn and Bacon, 1981. p.519-523.
Fantuzro et al. The family effects of abuse. In: Siegelman CK, Shaffer DR.(Eds.). Life span human development. Baltimore, Wadsworth Publ. Co., 1999.
Gerbner G, Groos L, Signorielli N, Morgan M, Jackson BM. The demonstration of power: violence profile. No.10. Journal of Communication. 1979;29(3):177-195.
Goodenough C. Development of sex, related differences and gender roles. In: Berk LE. Child development. Massachussetes, Allyn and Bacon, 1981. p.519-523.
Hartup WW. Aggression in childhood. Developmental perspectives. American Psychologist, 29: 336-341, 1974.
Holder, Ritchie. The family effects of abuse. In: Sigelman CK, Shaffer DR. (Eds.). Life span human development. California, Brooks Cole Publ. Co.,1995.
Jaffe et al. How and why children hate. In: Kedar ND, Verna V. (Eds.). How and why children hate. A study of conscious and unconscious sources. London, Briddles Ltda. Guilford and Kings, Lynn, 1993.
Kempe CH, Silverman BF, Steele PW, Droegemueller PW, Silver HK. The battered child sydrome. Journal of American Medical Association. 1962;181:17-24.
Maccoby EE, Jacklin CN. The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, C. A., Standford University Press, 1974.
Martin HP, Beezley R, Conway ES, Kempe CH. The development of abused children. Advances in paediatrics. Chicago Year Book, Medical Publishers,1974.
Panda LE. A case study of street children in Bhubaneswar. Bhubaneswar, National Institute of habitat management, 1994.
Panicker R, Nangia P. Working and street children in Dehli. Ghaziabad, National labour institute, 1992.
Sarrani C. Self conceptions, personality and emotional expression. In: Siegelma CK, Shaffer DR. (Eds.). Life span human development. California, Wadsworth Publ.Co., 1999.
Parke RD, Slaby RG. The development of aggression. In: Hetherington E.M.(Ed.). Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 4: Socialization, personality and socialdevelopment.4ª ed. New York: Wiley; 1993.
Schecheter S, Robert GS. Child’s rights to pretection. In: Cooray TC. Child s rights, the Sri Lankan experience. Colombo, Gaonasekara & Kularatna/Open University Press, 1976.
Riessman CK. (Eds.). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park/Ca, Sage Publications, 1993.
UNICEF. A profile of Srilankan child in crisis and conflict. Colombo, UNICEF, 1990.
Winer B. Statistical principles of experimental design. New York, Mcgraw-Hill, 1971.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JOURNAL PUBLISHERS
Publishers who are Committee on Publication Ethics members and who support COPE membership for journal editors should:
- Follow this code, and encourage the editors they work with to follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Edi- tors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf)
- Ensure the editors and journals they work with are aware of what their membership of COPE provides and en- tails
- Provide reasonable practical support to editors so that they can follow the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors (http://publicationethics.org/files/u2/New_Code.pdf_)
Publishers should:
- Define the relationship between publisher, editor and other parties in a contract
- Respect privacy (for example, for research participants, for authors, for peer reviewers)
- Protect intellectual property and copyright
- Foster editorial independence
Publishers should work with journal editors to:
- Set journal policies appropriately and aim to meet those policies, particularly with respect to:
– Editorial independence
– Research ethics, including confidentiality, consent, and the special requirements for human and animal research
– Authorship
– Transparency and integrity (for example, conflicts of interest, research funding, reporting standards
– Peer review and the role of the editorial team beyond that of the journal editor
– Appeals and complaints
- Communicate journal policies (for example, to authors, readers, peer reviewers)
- Review journal policies periodically, particularly with respect to new recommendations from the COPE
- Code of Conduct for Editors and the COPE Best Practice Guidelines
- Maintain the integrity of the academic record
- Assist the parties (for example, institutions, grant funders, governing bodies) responsible for the investigation of suspected research and publication misconduct and, where possible, facilitate in the resolution of these cases
- Publish corrections, clarifications, and retractions
- Publish content on a timely basis
