Cruzamentos e limites na pesquisa sobre comunicação: o sentido prático interdisciplinar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v17i3p117-140Palavras-chave:
Comunicação, Pesquisa interdisciplinar, Pesquisa centrada em um problemaResumo
Este texto trabalha com o argumento de que muitos dos desafios contemporâneos da pesquisa em comunicação se devem a desafios interdisciplinares em si e, ao mesmo tempo, aponta diferentes provocações epistemológicas da pesquisa interdisciplinar como desafios propriamente comunicativos. Ele reflete sobre a pesquisa em comunicação e possíveis domínios de conhecimento aplicado à sua prática normativa, em torno da qual uma série de questões de comunicação podem ser determinadas sem perder o que vários estudiosos chamaram de sua natureza e condição (inter)disciplinar.
Downloads
Referências
Allmendinger, J. (2015). Quests for interdisciplinarity: A challenge for the era and horizon 2020. Policy Brief by the Research, Innovation, and Science Policy Experts (RISE).
Bogdan, L., Philippe, K., Tobias, S., & Theodoros V. (Eds.). (2018). Integration of social sciences and humanities in horizon 2020: Participants, budget and disciplined. Publications Office of the European Union.
Bourdieu, P. (2002). Campo de poder, campo intelectual. Montresor.
Calhoun, C., & Rhoten, D. (2017). Integrating the social sciences: Theoretical knowledge, methodological tools, and practical applications. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein & C. Mitcham (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 103-118). Oxford University Press.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research. Sage.
Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x
Craig, R. T. (2005). Communication as a practice. In G. Shepherd, J. St. John & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as: Perspectives on theory (pp. 38-47). Sage.
Craig, R. T. (2008). Communication in the conversation of disciplines. Russian Journal of Communication, 1(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2008.10756694
Craig, R. T. (2012). Communication as a field and discipline. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication (Vol. 8, 2a ed., pp. 3811-3816). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecc074
Craig, R. T. (2013). 3 Constructing theories in communication research. In P. Cobley & P. Schulz. (Eds.), Theories and Models of Communication (pp. 39-58). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110240450.39
Craig, R. T. (2016). Pragmatist realism in communication theory. European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 7(2), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc.7.2.115_1
Craig, R. T. (2018). For a practical discipline. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx013
Craig, R. T. (2019). Welcome to the metamodel: A reply to Pablé. European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 10(1), 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc.10.1.101_1
Craig, R. T. (2022). Communication research and education for a practical discipline. In J. Muñoz Uribe (Ed.), La formación en comunicación: Visiones de una formación futura: Conceptos y aproximaciones (pp. 51-75). Pontificia Universidad Católica de Ecuador.
De Boer, H. F., Huisman, J., Jongbloed, B. W. A., Kolster, R., van der Meulen, B. J. R., Bok, C., & Van Lancker, W. (2020). Prospective report on the future of transnational collaboration in European higher education. Directorate General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture. https://doi.org/10.2766/098140
Deetz, S. (Ed.). (1994). Communication Yearbook 17 (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856741
Dervin, B., & Song, M. (2004, 27-31 de mayo). Communication as a field-historical origins, diversity as strength/weakness, orientation toward research in the public interest: 54 ruminations from field grandparents, parents, and a few feisty grandchildren [Presentación de trabajo]. International Communication Association Annual Meeting, Louisiana, NO, United States.
Donsbach, W. (2006). The identity of communication research. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 437-448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00294.x
Frodeman, R. (2013). Interdisciplinarity, communication, and the limits of knowledge. In M. O’Rourke, S. Crowley, D. Eigenbrode & D. Wulfhorst (Eds.), Enhancing communication & collaboration in interdisciplinary research (pp. 103-116). Sage.
Hawkins, R., Wiemann, J., & Pingree, S. (Eds.). (1988). Advancing communication science: Merging mass and interpersonal processes. Sage.
Holbrook, J. B. (2013). What is interdisciplinary communication? Reflections on the very idea of disciplinary integration. Synthese, 190, 1865-1879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0179-7
International Communication Association. (2019, 24-28 de mayo). 2019 conference calls for papers. https://www.icahdq.org/page/PastFuture
Jouvenel, B. (1965). L’art de la Conjeture. Sedeis.
Katz, E. (1983). The return of the humanities and sociology. Journal of Communication, 33(3), 51-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1983.tb02405.x
Klein, J. (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory, and practice. Wayne State University Press.
Krippendorff, K. (2017). Three concepts to retire. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 92-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1291281
Lasswell, H. (1958). Communications as an emerging discipline. Audio Visual Communi-cation Review, 6, 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768457
León-Duarte, G. A. (2007). Sobre la institucionalización del campo académico de la comunicación en América Latina: Una aproximación a las características estructurales de la investigación latinoamericana en comunicación [Tesis doctoral, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona]. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/4196
León-Duarte, G. A. (2015). La práctica interdisciplinaria aplicada al estudio de la comunicación y la información mediada por tecnología digital. Revista Iberoamericana de las Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas, 4(8), 363-381.
León-Duarte, G. A. (2019). Aportes teóricos a la investigación del campo periodístico. Sentidos y significados desde el Campo Intelectual Creador. Intercom, 42(3), 41-59.
León-Duarte, G. A. (2021). Teoria intermediária na comunicação: Elementos necessários para uma abordagem da comunicação como cultura. MATRIZes, 15(2), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v15i2p95-118
León-Duarte, G. A. (2022a). Methodological principles of interdisciplinary research: The integrated study of the image in social networks. Revista Internacional de Tecnología, Ciencia y Sociedad, 11(1), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.37467/gkarevtechno.v11.3097
León-Duarte, G. A. (2022b). The essentialist critique in interdisciplinary studies in the USA. About the process of integrating a common ground in interdisciplinary research. Norteamérica, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.22201/cisan.24487228e.2022.1.509
León-Duarte, G. A. (2022c). Sobre innovación e investigación interdisciplinar en Europa y EUA. Comunicar el paradigma interdisciplinar en la educación superior. Observatorio, 16(4), 128-142. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS16420222060
León-Duarte, G. A. (2022d). Escenarios epistemológicos de la comunicación interdisciplinar. Criterios metodológicos esenciales. In S. R.-M. de la Cruz & R. Rubial-Villamarín (Eds.), Desafíos audiovisuales de la tecnología y los contenidos en la cultura digital (pp. 419‐434). McGraw Hill España.
León-Duarte, G. A., Contreras Cázarez, C. R., & Moreno Carrillo, D. (2016). Probando modelos interdisciplinares inclusivos en la dependencia de internet en jóvenes. Nuevas variables asociadas. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (71), 616-631. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2016-1112
(NAS) National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine. (2005). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11153
Neurath, O. (1938). Encyclopaedism as a pedagogical aim: A Danish approach. Philosophy of Science, 5(4), 484-492. https://doi.org/10.1086/286527
Penman, R. (2012). On taking communication seriously. Australian Journal of Communication, 39(3), 41-63.
Pfau, M. (2008). Epistemological and disciplinary intersections. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 597-602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00414.x
Piñuel-Raigada, J. L. (Ed.) (2011). La investigación y la docencia universitarias entorno a la Comunicación como objeto de estudio en Europa y en América Latina. Cuadernos Artesanos de Latina, 15.
Pohl, C., Klein, J. T., Hoffmann, S., Mitchell, C., & Fam, D. (2021). Conceptualizing transdisciplinary integration as a multidimensional interactive process. Environmental Science and Policy, 118(2), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.005
Pooley, J. D. (2016). Communication theory and the disciplines. In K. B. Jensen & R. Craig (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy (pp. 3-16). Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect261
Price, L. (2014). Critical Realist Versus Mainstream Interdisciplinarity. Journal of Critical Realism, 13(1), 52-76.
Repko, A., Szostak, R., & Buchberger, M. (2019). Introduction to interdisciplinary studies. Sage.
Rowland, W. D., Jr. (1993). The traditions of communication research and their implications for telecommunications study, Journal of Communication, 43(3), 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01294.x
Schneider, S. (1977, 20-25 de febrero). Quality Review Standards for Interdisciplinary Research, paper presented at “Can Research Institutions Accommodate Interdisciplinary Researchers?” [Presentación de trabajo]. Symposium at 143rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Denver, CO, United States.
Shadish, W. R. (1986). Planned critical multiplism: Some elaborations. Behavioral Assessment, 8(1), 75-103.
Shadish, W. R. (1993). Critical multiplism: A research strategy and its attendant tactics. New Directions for Program Evaluation, (60), 13-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1660
Shoemaker, P. J. (1993). Communication in crisis: Theory, curricula, and power. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 146-153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01315.x
Zhu, Y., & Fu, K.-W. (2019). The relationship between interdisciplinarity and journal impact factor in the field of communication during 1997-2016. Journal of Communication, 69(3), 273-297. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz012
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista para fins não comerciais.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
