Sobre os elos (perdidos) entre as pesquisas em midiatização alemã, latino-americana e francesa: reflexões sobre os diversos meios de pesquisa e suas tradições
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v17i3p241-272Palavras-chave:
Pesquisa em midiatização, História transnacional dos estudos da comunicação, Eliseo VerónResumo
A pesquisa em midiatização não é uma invenção europeia, estando também enraizada nos Estudos Culturais e na semiótica latino-americanos. Com base no esquema analítico de Maria Löblich e da autora sobre como analisar a história de um campo de estudo na pesquisa em comunicação nos termos de seu corpus de ideias e seu corpus social, este artigo discute as (des)conexões transnacionais no campo da pesquisa em midiatização com relação a) às raízes latino-americanas e francesas desse campo de pesquisa e b) tentando responder por que elas permanecem desconhecidas, pelo menos nos estudos da comunicação na Alemanha. As barreiras de recepção contra as tradições latino-americanas e francesas dominam a tradição da pesquisa alemã. Ainda hoje, E. Verón, Martín-Barbero, A. Mattelart e outros são autores mais ou menos desconhecidos na pesquisa em comunicação alemã. A semiopragmática de Eliseo Verón e a abordagem da mediação cultural de Jésus Martín-Barbero raramente são consideradas como raízes da pesquisa em midiatização nas publicações alemãs. No entanto, nos últimos anos, observam-se contatos de pesquisa transnacionais promissores nos principais meios de pesquisa em midiatização, iniciadas principalmente por acadêmicos latino-americanos.
Downloads
Referências
Anselmino, N. R. (2018). A semio-anthropological perspective on mediatization: Semiosis 2 by Eliseo Verón. Communication Theory, 28(2), 229-233. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtx011
Averbeck, S. (1999). Kommunikation als Prozess. Soziologische Perspektiven in der Zeitungswissenschaft (1927-1935). LIT.
Averbeck. S. (2001). The post-1933 emigration of communication researchers from Germany. The lost works of the Weimar Generation. European Journal of Communication, 16(4), 451-475.
Averbeck-Lietz, S. (2010). Kommunikationstheorien in Frankreich. Der epistemologische Diskurs der Sciences de l’information et de la communication (1975-2005). Avinus.
Averbeck-Lietz, S. (2012). French and Latin American perspectives on mediation and mediatization: A lecture note from Germany. Empedocles. European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 3(2), 177-195. https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc.3.2.177_1
Averbeck-Lietz, S. (2014). Da ciência do periódico à “ciência da liderança nacional-socialista”: Como os estudos de imprensa adotaram o regime nazista na Alemanha. Famecos, 21(2), 418-437. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2014.2.18248
Averbeck-Lietz, S. (2015a). Soziologie der Kommunikation. Die Mediatisierung der Gesellschaft und die Theoriebildung der Klassiker. De Gruyter.
Averbeck-Lietz, S. (2015b). Schnittstellen zwischen Kommunikationsgeschichte und Mediatisierungsforschung. Ein Beitrag zur theoretischen Fundierung kommunikationsgeschichtlicher Forschung. In S. Kinnebrock, C. Schwarzenegger & T. Birkner (Eds.), Theorien des Medienwandels (pp. 250-276). Herbert von Halem.
Averbeck-Lietz, S, & Löblich, M. (2017). Kommunikationswissenschaft vergleichend und transnational. Eine Einführung. In S. Averbeck-Lietz (Ed.), Kommunikationswissenschaft im internationalen Vergleich. Transnationale Perspektiven (pp. 1-29). Springer.
Averbeck-Lietz, S., & Klein, P. (2019). Institution und Gesellschaft: Warum die frühe Münsteraner entwicklungs- und interkulturelle Kommunikationsforschung keine Nachhaltigkeit entfalten konnte. Medien & Zeit, 1, 29-39.
Averbeck-Lietz, S., Bonnet, F., Cordonnier, S., & Wilhelm, C. (2019). Communication studies in France. Looking for a “Terre du milieu.” Publizistik, 64, 363-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-019-00504-3
Averbeck-Lietz, S. & Cordonnier, S. (2022). French and German Theories of Communication: Comparative Perspectives with regard to the social and the epistemological body of science. In J. Yin & Y. Miike (Eds.), ICA-Handbook of Global Interventions in Communication Theory (pp. 373-392). Routledge.
Badr, H., & Ganter, S. (2021). Towards Cosmopolitan media and communication studies: Bringing diverse epistemic perspectives into the field. Global Media Journal – German Edition, 11(1), 2-11. https://doi.org/10.22032/dbt.49164
Beck, K. (2009). Zeitung als anonyme Wechselbeziehung. Der Beitrag Hans Traubs zur Entwicklung von der Zeitungs- zur Kommunikationswissenschaft. In S. Averbeck-Lietz, P. Klein & M. Meyen (Eds.), Historische und systematische Kommunikationswissenschaft. Festschrift für Arnulf Kutsch (pp. 197-215). Lumière.
Beck, K. (2023, April 23). Mannheim, Karl. Publictionnaire. Dictionnaire encyclopédique et critique des publics. http://publictionnaire.huma-num.fr/notice/mannheim-karl/
Bellingradt, D., Requate, J., & Blome, A. (2021). Jahrbuch für Kommunikationsgeschichte (2018-2021). Franz Steiner Verlag.
Benz, S., Hepp, A., & Kirschner, H. (2022). Diálogos sobre mediatización. Una introducción a las investigaciones sobre mediatización en el Zemki. DeSignis, (37), 25-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.35659/designis.i37p25-34
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
Birkner, T. (2023). Medialisierung und Mediatisierung (3rd ed.). Nomos.
Bolz, L. (2019). Recherches sur le journalisme en France et en Allemagne, un dialogue impossible? Regards croisés sur des méthodologies et des développements divergents. Revue Française des Sciences de L’information et de la Communication, 18. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfsic.7702
Brosda, C. (2008). Diskursethik. In C. Brosda & C. Schicha (Eds.), Handbuch Medienethik (pp. 83-106). Springer.
Buchstein, H. (2023). Habermas, Jürgen (2022). Ein neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit und die deliberative Politik [Book review]. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, (64), 637-640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-023-00473-3
Chakravartty, P., Kuo, R., Grubbs, V., & McIlwain, C (2018). #CommuniationSoWhite. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 254-266. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy003
Chauvel, L. E., & Olivera, G. (2022). Mediatización: El largo recorrido de un concepto. DeSignis, (37), 9-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.35659/designis.i37p9-21
Chauvel, L. E., Soto, M., & Traversa, O. (Eds.). (2018). La semiosis social. Homenaje a Eliseo Verón. DeSignis, (29).
Cheveigné, S. (2018). L’itinéraire intellectuel d’Eliseo Verón en France. Communication & Langages, (196), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.3917/comla1.196.0027
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2016). The mediated construction of reality. Polity.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2021). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, arguments. In C. Scolari, J.-L. Fernández & J. Rodríguez-Amat (Eds.), Mediatization(s), theoretical conversations between Europe and Latin America (pp. 14-24). Intellect.
Dalmasso, M.-T., & Saur, D. (Eds.). (2015). Homenaje a Eliseo Verón. Estudios. Revista del Centro de Estudios Avanzados, (33), 67-68. https://doi.org/10.31050/re.v0i33.11604
Daros, O. (2019). Publizistik, the precursor of communication sciences? Matrizes, 13(2), 228-234. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v13i2p253-259
Daros, O. (2023). CIESPAL and the development of education and research in communication in Latin America. Studies in Communication Sciences, 23(1), 105-120. https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scom2023.01.3334
Deacon D., & Stanyer, J. (2014). Mediatization: Key concept or conceptual bandwagon? Media, Culture & Society, 36(7), 1032-1044. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443714542218
Duchkowitsch, W., Hausjell, F., & Semrad, B. (Eds.). (2004). Die Spirale des Schweigens. Zum Umgang mit der nationalsozialistischen Zeitungswissenschaft. LIT.
Fausto Neto, A. (2019). Mediation x mediatization: Concepts between trajectories, biographies and geographies. In J. Ferreira, J. L. Braga, P. G. Gomes, A. Fausto Neto & A. P. da Rosa (Eds.), Between what we say and what we think. Where is mediatization? (pp. 59-97). Facos UFSM.
Ferreira, J., Braga, J. L., Gomes, P. G., Fausto Neto, A., & Rosa, A. P. (Orgs.). (2019). Presentation. In J. Ferreira, J. L. Braga, P. G. Gomes, A. Fausto Neto & A. D. da Rosa (Eds.), Between what we say and what we think. Where is Mediatization? (pp. 11-17). Facos UFSM.
Fuentes-Navarro, R. (2016). Institutionalization and internationalization of the field of communication studies in Mexico and Latin America. In P. Simonson & D. Park (Eds.), The international history of communication study (pp. 325-345). Routledge.
Fuentes-Navarro, R. (2020). Leer la biblioteca mattelartiana. Matrizes, 14(3), 93-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v14i3p93-115
Ganter, S. A., & Ortega, F. (2019). The invisibility of Latin American scholarship in European media and communication studies: Challenges and opportunities of de-westernization and academic cosmopolitanism. International Journal of Communication, 13, 68-91.
García-Jiménez, L., Hernández Pérez, M., & Subtil, F. (2019). Cultural studies. History, debates and primary references of cultural studies in Europe. In F. O. Paulino, G. Kaplún, M. Vicente-Mariño & L. Custodio (Eds.), Research traditions in dialogue: Communication studies in Latin America and Europe (pp. 123-152). Media XXI.
Gentzel, P., & Koenen, E. (2012). Moderne Kommunikationswelten: von den „papiernen Fluten” zur „mediation of everything.” Ein Beitrag zur disziplinär-kognitiven Identität des kommunikationswissenschaftlichen Forschungsfelds „mediatisierte Kommunikation.” Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 60(2), 197-217.
Gomes, P. G. (2017). Dos meios à midiatização. Um conceito em evolução. Editora Unisinos.
Gomes, P. G. (2018). From media to mediations: Jesús Martín-Barbero in the Unisinos communication theory. Matrizes, 12(1), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v12i1p189-202
Gómez-Mejia, G., Le Marec, J., & Souchier, E. (2018a). Verón entre les mondes. Communication & Langages, 196, 9-26. https://doi.org/10.3917/comla1.196.0009
Gómez-Mejia, G., Le Marec, J., & Souchier, E. (Eds.). (2018b). Eliséo Verón. Vers une sémio-anthropologie. Communication & Langages, 196(2).
Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1-35.
Hagemann, W. (1948). Publizistik im Dritten Reich: Ein Beitrag zur Methodik der Massenführung. Hansischer.
Hardt, H. (2002). Am Vergessen Scheitern. Essay zur historischen Identität der Publizistikwissenschaft (1945-68). Medien & Zeit, 17(2-3), 34-39.
Jírak, J., & Köpplovà, B. (2017). Zur Entwicklung der Kommunikationsforschung in der tschechischen Universität und Gesellschaft. In S. Averbeck-Lietz (Ed.), Kommunikationswissenschaft im internationalen Vergleich. Transnationale Perspektive (pp. 239-273). Springer.
Katz, E., Liebes, T., & Durham Peters, J. (2002). Canonic texts in media research are there any? Should there be? How about these? Wiley.
Klein, P. (2006). Henk Prakke und die funktionale Publizistik. Über die Entgrenzung der Publizistik- zur Kommunikationswissenschaft. Lit.
Koch, U. E. (2004). Zwischen Frankreich und Deutschland vermitteln. In M. Meyen & M. Löblich (Eds.), „Ich habe dieses Fach erfunden.” Wie die Kommunikationswissenschaft an die deutschsprachigen Universitäten kam (pp. 136-151). Herbert von Halem.
Koenen, E., & Sanko, C. (2018). German communication studies facing the challenge of digital media change: Debates and controversies in the scientific community since the 1990s. Famecos, 25(1), Artigo 27647. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-3729.2018.1.27647
Krämer, B. (2023). How German communication research discovered Bourdieu but missed his potential for the study of (populist) political communication. History of Media Studies, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.32376/d895a0ea.7ec13efb.
Krotz, F. (2012). Von der Entdeckung der Zentralperspektive zur Augmented Reality: Wie Mediatisierung funktioniert. In F. Krotz & A. Hepp (Eds.), Mediatisierte Welten. Forschungsfelder und Beschreibungsansätze (pp. 27-55). Springer.
Krotz, F. (2019). Neue Theorien entwickeln. Eine Einführung in die heuristische empirische Kommunikationsforschung mit Bezug auf Ethnographie und Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). Herbert von Halem.
Krotz, F. (2023). Die Teilung geistiger Arbeit per Computer. Eine Kritik der digitalen Transformation. Beltz Juventa.
Krotz, F., & Hepp, A. (2012). Mediatisierte Welten. Forschungsfelder und Beschreibungsansätze. Springer.
Kutsch, A. (1987). Zeitungswissenschaftler im Dritten Reich. Sieben biografische Studien. Ertay Hayit.
Kutsch, A. (2010). Die Entstehung des Deutschen Zeitungswissenschaftlichen Verbandes. Jahrbuch für Kommunikationsgeschichte, 12, 121-144.
Lerg, C. (2019). Universitätsdiplomatie. Wissenschaft und Prestige in den transatlantischen Beziehungen (1890-1920). Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Livingstone, S. (2009). On the mediation of everything: ICA Presidential Address 2008. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01401.x
Löblich, M. (2010). Die empirisch-sozialwissenschaftliche Wende in der Publizistik- und Zeitungswissenschaft. Herbert von Halem.
Löblich, M., & Scheu, A. (2011). Writing the history of communication studies: A sociology of science approach. Communication Theory, 21(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01373.x
Lohmeier, C. (2016). Cultural Studies in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. In S. Averbeck-Lietz & M. Meyen (Eds.), Handbuch nicht standardisierte Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (pp. 109-125). Springer.
Lozano, J. C. (2016). Critical Concerns and Commercial Interests: The Historical Development and Incipient Consolidation of Communication Research in Mexico. In S. Averbeck-Lietz (Ed.), Kommunikationswissenschaft im internationalen Vergleich. Transnationale Perspektiven (347-358). Springer.
Lundby, K. (2014). (Ed.). Mediatization of communication. De Gruyter.
Mannheim, K. (1929). Die Bedeutung der Konkurrenz im Gebiete des Geistigen. Schriften der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie, 17(19), 35-83.
Martín-Barbero, J. (1987). De los medios a las mediaciones. Gustavo Gili.
Massmann, A. (2004). Von « Kommunikation für Entwicklung« zur » cultura mediática ». Publizistik, 49, 275-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-004-0072-6
Mattelart, A., & Mattelart, M. (1997). Histoire des théories de la communication. Editions la Découverte.
Meyen, M. (2012). The founding parents of communication: 57 interviews with ICA fellows. An introduction. International Journal of Communication, 6, 1451-1459.
Miège, B. (2005). La pensée communicationnelle. Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Miège, B. (2019). Updating the approach to the mediatization of info-communication actions. In J. Ferreira, J. L. Braga, P. G. Gomes, A. Fausto Neto & A. P. da Rosa (Eds.), Between what we say and what we think. Where is mediatization? (pp. 37-59). Facos UFSM.
Miike, Y., & Yin, J. (Eds.). (2022). The handbook of global interventions in communication theory. Routledge.
Noelle-Neumann, E. (2001). My friend, Paul F. Lazarsfeld. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 13(3), 315-321. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/13.3.315
Olivera, G. (2015). Eliseo Verón: Las condiciones tecnológico enunciativas de los saberes sobre el sentido o el espesor de la escritura. Estudios, (33), 109-129.
Paulino, F. O., Kaplún, G., Vicente-Mariño, M., & Custódio, L. (Eds.). (2019). Research traditions in dialogue: Communication studies in Latin America and Europe. Media XXI.
Pinto, F. N. A. (2020). Antropologia entre três mundos: Emilio Willems e a institucionalização da antropologia brasileira [Masters thesis, Universidade Estadual de Campinas]. Repositório da Produção Científica e Intelectual da Unicamp. https://bit.ly/3sDWr9Z
Richter, C., Grüne, A., Hafez, K., Fiedler, A., Behmer, M., Horz-Ishak, C. … Thomaß, B. (2023). Die “tiefe Internationalisierung” der deutschen Kommunikationswissenschaft? Eine Evaluation der Personal- und Forschungsstrukuren- sowie der Lehrprogramme deutscher Hochschulen. Global Media Journal – German Edition, 13(1), 2-51. https://doi.org/10.22032/dbt.57904
Rüdiger, F., Escosteguy, A. C. (2016). Brazilian Research in Communication: Historical Synopsis and Reflexive Trends of Academic Work in an Emerging Country. In S. Averbeck-Lietz (Ed.), Kommunikationswissenschaft im internationalen Vergleich. Transnationale Perspektiven (pp. 359-381). Springer.
Rüdiger, F. (2019). Síntese de história da publicística. Estágios reflexivos da ciência da comunicação pública alemã. Insular.
Sá Martino, L. M. (2019). Mediatization, North, and South: Highlights and outlines in Brazilian research and Anglo-Saxon. In J. Ferreira, J. L. Braga, P. G. Gomes, A. Fausto Neto & A. P. da Rosa (Eds.), Between what we say and what we think. Where is mediatization? (pp. 209-224). Facos UFSM.
Sabich, M. A. (2016). Taking digital media to school: A sociosemiotic perspective on educational portals. Open Access Library Journal, 3, Article e2574. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102574
Said, E. (1983). The world, the text, and the critic. Harvard University Press.
Saucedo Añez, P. C. (2019). Die lateinamerikanische Medien- und Kommunikationsforschung zwischen ideologischer Prägung und begrenzter Internationalisierung: Zeit für Selbstkritik. Global Media Journal – German Edition, 9(2), 2-15. https://doi.org/10.22032/dbt.40625
Scheu, A. (2012). Adornos Erben in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Eine Verdrängungsgeschichte? Herbert von Halem.
Scheu, A. (2016). Grounded Theory in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. In S. Averbeck-Lietz & M. Meyen (Eds.), Handbuch nicht standardisierte Methoden in der Kommunikationswissenschaft (pp. 81-95). Springer.
Scheu, A. (2023). Fachgeschichte als Erinnerungsforschung: Die Beziehung von Fachgeschichte und Fachgedächtnis am Beispiel der deutschen Kommunikationswissenschaft. In C. Pentzold & C. Lohmeier (Eds.), Handbuch kommunikationswissenschaftliche Erinnerungsforschung (pp. 392-406). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110629743-018
Schmidt, R. E., & Petersen, T. (2022). Beyond Marienthal: The relationship between Elisabeth Noelle-Neumann and Paul F. Lazarsfeld. International Journal of Communication, 16, 664-672.
Schwer, K. (2005). „Typisch deutsch?” Zur zögerlichen Rezeption der Cultural Studies in der deutschen Kommunikationswissenschaft. Münchener Beiträge zur Kommunikationswissenschaft, 2(2).
Scolari, C. A. (2008). Hipermediaciones. Elementos para una teoría de la comunicación digital interactiva. Gedisa.
Scolari, C. A. (2014, May 4th). ¿Bibliografía del oprimido? Hacia una crítica de la razón bibliográfica. Hipermediaciones. https://bit.ly/47As833
Scolari, C. A. (2015). From (new)media to (hyper)mediations. Recovering Jesús Martín-Barbero’s mediation theory in the age of digital communication and cultural convergence. Information, Communication & Society, 18(9), 1092-1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1018299
Scolari, C. A. (2022). Between social semiosis and mediatizations. Toward a dictionary of Eliseo Verón’s theoretical contributions. In Y. Miike & J. Yin (Eds.), The handbook of global interventions in communication theory (pp. 284-297). Routledge.
Scolari, C. A., & Rodríguez-Amat, J. R. (2018). A Latin American approach to mediatization: Specificities and contributions to a global discussion about how the media shapes contemporary society. Communication Theory, 28(2), 131-154. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtx004
Scolari, C. A., Fernández, J. L., & Rodriguez-Amat, J. (Eds.). (2021). Mediatization(s), theoretical conversations between Europe and Latin America. Intellect.
Simonson, P., & Park, D. (2016). Latin America. In P. Simonson & D. Park (Eds.), The international history of communication studies (pp. 323-324). Routledge.
Simonson, P., Park, D., & Pooley, J. (2022). Exclusions/exclusiones: The role for history in the field’s reckoning. History of Media Studies, 2. https://doi.org/10.32376/d895a0ea.ed348e03
Traversa, O. (2018). L’origine et le changement dans l’oeuvre d’Eliseo Verón. Communication & Langages, (196), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.3917/comla1.196.0039
Valdetarro, S. (Ed.). (2021). Mediation(s) studies. CIM 10th anniversary. UNR Editora.
Vassallo de Lopes, M. I., & Romancini, R. (2016). History in communication studies in Brazil. The interdisciplinary institutionalization of a study field. In P. Simonson & D. Park (Eds.), The international history of communication research (pp. 346-366). Routledge.
Verón, E. (2013). La semiosis social 2. Ideas, momentos, interpretantes. Paidós.
Verón, E. (2014). Mediatization theory: A semio-anthropological perspective. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of communication (pp. 163-174). De Gruyter-Mouton.
Verón, E. (2015). Teoría de la mediatización: una perspectiva semio-antropológica. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación, 20, 173-182.
Verón, E., & Boutaud, J.-J. (2007). Sémiotique ouverte. Intinéraires sémiotiques en communication. Lavoisier.
Volk, S. C. (2021). Comparative communication research: A study of the conceptual, methodological, and social challenges of international collaborative studies in communication science. Springer.
Vroons, E. (2005). Communication studies in Europe: A sketch of the situation around 1955. Gazette, 67(6), 495-522. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549205057541
Wagner, H. (2023). Media studies in Germany. History of Media Studies 3(3), https://doi.org/10.32376/d895a0ea.5644812e
Wessler, H. (2018). Habermas and the media. Polity Press.
Wilhelm, C., & Thévenin, O. (2017). The French context of internet studies: Sociability and digital practice. In S. Averbeck-Lietz (Ed.), Kommunikationswissenschaft im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 161-185). Springer.
Zarowsky, M. (2017). Los estudios en comunicación en la Argentina. Ideas, intelectuales, tradiciones político-culturales (1956-1985). Eudeba.
Zarowsky, M. (2021). Communication studies in Argentina in the 1960s and ‘70s: Specialized knowledge and intellectual intervention between the local and the global. History of Media Studies, 1. https://doi.org/10.32376/d895a0ea.42a0a7aa
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
- Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista para fins não comerciais.
- Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
