Contribuições da Paidéia para Avanços Metodológicos na Pesquisa em Psicologia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/Resumo
Paidéia, maintaining its tradition as a pioneer in disseminating scientific knowledge on Psychology in Brazil, published in 2023 a thematic dossier entitled “Methodological Challenges in Psychology: Contributions to Practice and Academic Knowledge.” The initiative sought to stimulate reflection and discussions on the methodological challenges of knowledge production in Psychology. Its thematic choice is justified by the relevance of producing material that broadens the methodological knowledge of future generations of researchers. Brazil still produces few handbooks dedicated to guiding methodological decisions that contribute to the robustness of studies conducted in the various Psychology subfields. Paidéia’s high citation rate of methodological articles should also be considered, as this emphasizes the need to provide quality texts to fill the gaps in the process of training new researchers.
Downloads
Referências
Aguinis, H. and Solarino, A. (2019). Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: the case of interviews with elite informants. Strategic Management Journal, 40(8), 1291-1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3015
» https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3015
Antunes, A. and Martins, S. (2023). Teaching qualitative research in psychology: a look at the portuguese reality. Social Sciences, 12(8), 448. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12080448
» https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12080448
Delgado‐Romero, E., Singh, A., & Santos, J. (2018). Cuéntame: the promise of qualitative research with latinx populations. Journal of Latina/O Psychology, 6(4), 318-328. https://doi.org/10.1037/lat0000123
» https://doi.org/10.1037/lat0000123
Gough, B., & Madill, A. (2012). Subjectivity in psychological science: from problem to prospect. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 374-384. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029313
» https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029313
Grzanka, P. and Moradi, B. (2021). The qualitative imagination in counseling psychology: enhancing methodological rigor across methods. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(3), 247-258. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000560
» https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000560
Hoover, S., Strapp, C., Ito, A., Foster, K., & Roth, K. (2018). Teaching qualitative research interviewer skills: a developmental framework for social justice psychological research teams. Qualitative Psychology, 5(2), 300-318. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000101
» https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000101
Mundey, P., Dopp, A., Slemaker, A., Beasley, L., Silovsky, J., & Eisenberg, D. (2023). Qualitative economic evaluation of psychosocial interventions: how looking beyond the numbers helps illuminate programmatic costs and benefits. Qualitative Psychology, 10(1), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000240
» https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000240
Pratt, M., Kaplan, S., & Whittington, R. (2019). Editorial essay: the tumult over transparency: decoupling transparency from replication in establishing trustworthy qualitative research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219887663
» https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219887663
Sabnis, S., Newman, D., Whitford, D., & Mossing, K. (2023). Publication and characteristics of qualitative research in school psychology journals between 2006 and 2021. School Psychology, 38(5), 330-336. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000548
» https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000548
Shaw, R., Bishop, F., Horwood, J., Chilcot, J., & Arden, M. (2019). Enhancing the quality and transparency of qualitative research methods in health psychology. British Journal of Health Psychology, 24(4), 739-745. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12393
» https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12393
Sticca, M. G., Mourão, L., & David, V. F. (2023). Paidéia and futures perspectives: Management Report - 2022. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 33, e3301. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3301
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3301
Weinstock, M. (2008). Psychological research and the epistemological approach to argumentation. Informal Logic, 26(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v26i1.435
» https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v26i1.435
Willig, C. (2019). What can qualitative psychology contribute to psychological knowledge?. Psychological Methods, 24(6), 796-804. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000218
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Direitos autorais (c) 2025 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Em relação à disponibilidade dos conteúdos, a Paidéia adota a Licença Creative Commons, CC-BY. Com essa licença é permitido copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato, bem como remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial, conferindo os devidos créditos autorais para à revista, fornecendo link para a licença e indicando se foram feitas alterações.
Reprodução parcial de outras publicações
Citações com mais de 500 palavras, reprodução de uma ou mais figuras, tabelas ou outras ilustrações devem ter permissão escrita do detentor dos direitos autorais do trabalho original para a reprodução especificada na revista Paidéia. A permissão deve ser endereçada ao autor do manuscrito submetido. Os direitos obtidos secundariamente não serão repassados em nenhuma circunstância.
