Relative susceptibility of tadpoles of Uperodon taprobanicus (Anura: Microhylidae) and Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Anura: Bufonidae) to predacious Hoplobatrachus tigerinus (Anura: Dicroglossidae) tadpoles: significance of refugia and swimming speed in pre
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9079.v22i2p139-146Keywords:
Antipredator behavior, Anuran larvae, Ephemeral ponds, Mortality, Predation threat, Prey-predator interactions, Refuge useAbstract
The relative susceptibility of two closely associated herbivorous tadpole species (Uperodon taprobanicus and Duttaphrynus melanostictus) to their natural carnivorous predatory tadpole, Hoplobatrachus tigerinus and the significance of refugia in predator avoidance was studied in the laboratory. In a total of 50 trials, 10 tadpoles each of U. taprobanicus and D. melanostictus of comparable sizes were exposed to starved H. tigerinus. Twenty-five trials included refugia while 25 did not. The results of this study showed that in both the presence and absence of refugia, D. melanostictus tadpoles fell prey to H. tigerinus more frequently than U. taprobanicus tadpoles. A key difference between the two prey species is the speed of swimming; Vmax of D. melanostictus (13.58 cm/s) tadpoles is significantly lower than that of U. taprobanicus (24.89 cm/s) tadpoles. This is likely to be the main reason why more D. melanostictus tadpoles were preyed upon than were U. taprobanicus tadpoles. It is important to note that the Vmax of the predator (60.21 cm/s) is much greater than those of the two prey species. However, predation risk of both prey tadpole species was affected significantly by the presence of refugia. The susceptibility of both prey tadpole species was lower where refugia were available. The present study clearly demonstrates that the more efficient avoidance of predation by U. taprobanicus tadpoles could be due to better use of refugia and their faster rate of movement.
Downloads
References
Benard, M. F. 2004. Predator-induced phenotypic plasticity in organisms with complex life histories. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 651–673.
Chivers, D. P. and R. S. Mirza. 2001. Importance of predator diet cues in responses to larval wood frogs to fsh and invertebrate predators. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27: 45–51.
Dayton, G. H., D. Saenz, K. A. Baum, R. B. Langerhans, and T. J. DeWitt. 2005. Body shape, burst speed and escape behavior of larval anurans. Oikos 111: 582–591.
Ferrari, M. C. O., B. D. Wisenden, and D. P. Chivers. 2010.
Chemical ecology of predator-prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 88: 698–724.
Gosner, K. L. 1960. A simplifed table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identifcation. Herpetologica 16:183–190.
Hews, D. K. 1988. Alarm response in larval western toads, Bufo boreas: release of larval chemicals by a natural predator and its efect on predator capture efciency. Animal Behaviour 36: 125–133.
Hossie, T. J. and D. L. Murray. 2010. You can’t run but you can hide: refuge use in frog tadpoles elicits densitydependent predation by dragonfy larvae. Oecologia 163: 395–404.
Hossie, T. J. and D. L. Murray. 2011. Efects of structural refuge and density on foraging behaviour and mortality of hungry tadpoles subject to predation risk. Ethology 117: 777–785.
Hossie, T. J., K. Landolt, and D. L. Murray. 2017. Determinants and co-expression of anti-predator responses in amphibian tadpoles: a meta-analysis. Oikos 126: 173–184.
Inger, R. F., V. A. Gour-Broome, K. Manamendra-Arachchi, A. de Silva, and S. Dutta. 2016. Uperodon taprobanicus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: eT578591639191.
Kiesecker, J. M., D. P. Chivers, and A. R. Blaustein. 1996. The use of chemical cues in predator recognition by western toad tadpoles. Animal Behaviour 52: 1237–1245.
Lardner, B. 2000. Morphological and life history responses to predators in larvae of seven anurans. Oikos 88: 169–180.
Lima, S. L. and L. M. Dill. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 619–640.
Loman, J. 1999. Early metamorphosis in common frog Rana temporaria tadpoles at risk of drying: an experimental demonstration. Amphibia-Reptilia 20: 421–430.
Mathis, A. 2003. Use of chemical cues in detection of conspecifc predators and prey by newts, Notophthalmus viridescens. Chemoecology 13: 193–197.
Mogali, S. M. 2018. Predatory cues infuence the behavioral responses and metamorphic traits of Polypedates maculatus (Anura: Rhacophoridae). Asian Herpetological Research 9: 199–194.
Mogali, S. M., S. K. Saidapur, and B. A. Shanbhag. 2011. Levels of predation modulate antipredator defense behavior and metamorphic traits in the toad Bufo melanostictus. Journal of Herpetology 45: 428–431.
Mogali, S. M., S. K. Saidapur, and B. A. Shanbhag. 2017. Infuence of desiccation threat on the metamorphic traits of the Asian common toad, Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Anura). Acta Herpetologica 12: 175–180.
Mogali, S. M., S. K. Saidapur, and B. A. Shanbhag. 2019. Experience of predacious cues and accessibility to refuge minimize mortality of Hylarana temporalis tadpoles. Acta Herpetologica 14: 15–19.
Mogali, S. M., S. K. Saidapur, and B. A. Shanbhag. 2020.
Behavioral responses of tadpoles of Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Anura: Bufonidae) to cues of starved and fed dragonfy larvae. Phyllomedusa 19: 93–98.
Mogali, S. M., B. A. Shanbhag, and S. K. Saidapur. 2021.
Comparative vulnerability of Indosylvirana temporalis and Clinotarsus curtipes (Anura: Ranidae) tadpoles to water scorpions: importance of refugia and swimming speed in predator avoidance. Phyllomedusa 20: 159–164.
Mogali, S. M., B. A. Shanbhag, and S. K. Saidapur. 2022.
Knowledge of predators and accessibility to refuge reduces larval mortality of the Bicolored frog, Clinotarsus curtipes (Anura: Ranidae). Salamandra 58: 157–160.
Newman, R. A. 1992. Adaptive plasticity in amphibian metamorphosis. Bioscience 42: 671–678.
Nystrom, P. and K. Abjornsson. 2000. Efect of fsh chemical cues on interaction between tadpoles and crayfsh. Oikos 88: 181–190.
Padhye, A., K. Manamendra-Arachchi, A. de Silva, S. Dutta, T. Kumar Shrestha, S. Bordoloi, T. Papenfuss, S. Anderson, S. Kuzmin, M. S. Khan, and R. Nussbaum, 2008. Hoplobatrachus tigerinus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008:e.T58301A11760496.
Relyea, R. A. 2007. Getting out alive: how predators afect the decision to metamorphose. Oecologia 152: 389–400.
Saidapur, S. K. 2001. Behavioral ecology of anuran tadpoles: the Indian scenario. Proceedings of Indian National Science Academy B67: 311–322.
Saidapur, S. K., D. K. Veeranagoudar, N. C. Hiragond, and B. A. Shanbhag. 2009. Mechanism of predator-prey detection and behavioral responses in some anuran tadpoles. Chemoecology 19: 21–28.
Schmidt, B. R. and A. Amezquita. 2001. Predator-induced behavioral responses: tadpoles of the neotropical frog Phyllomedusa tarsius do not respond to all predators. Herpetological Journal 11: 9–15.
Spieler, M. and K. E. Linsenmair. 1999. Aggregation behaviour of Bufo maculates tadpoles as an antipredator mechanism. Ethology 105: 665–686.
Van Buskirk, J. V. and A. McCollum. 2000. Infuence of tail shape on tadpole swimming performance. Journal of Experimental Biology 203: 2449–2458.
Van Dijk, P.P., D. Iskandar, M.W.N. Lau, G. Huiqing, G. Baorong, L. Kuangyang, C. Wenhao, Y. Zhigang, B. Chan, S. Dutta, R. F. Inger, K. Manamendra-Arachchi, and M. S. Khan. 2004. Duttaphrynus melanostictus (errata version published in 2016). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2004: e.T54707A86445591.
Werner, E. E. and D. J. Hall. 1974. Optimal foraging theory and the size selection of prey by the bluegill sunfsh (Lepomis macrochirus). Ecology 55: 1042–1052.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 ESALQ-USP
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All material originally published in Phyllomedusa belongs to Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz - Universidade de São Paulo. All contents are under a license of Creative Commons BY-NC-ND.
Impact Factor (JCR): 0.400
CiteScore: 1.0