Innovation potential scale (IPS): construction and validity evidence of a measure for the work context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/inmr-05-2023-0091Palavras-chave:
Innovation, Behavior, , Psychometrics, IntrapreneurshipResumo
PurposeThis article aims to develop a measure that assesses and maps the behaviors and traits of an individual with potential for innovation in the work context. To do so, it gathers evidence of factor validity and internal consistency.
Design/methodology/approachIn the work context, innovation is often linked with the idea of intrapreneurship. Some experts have pointed out that intrapreneurial activities are essential for promoting innovation. However, it is not just about the activities – the key is to create an environment that supports innovation, fostering a culture where new ideas can thrive. To achieve the objectives of this research, we conducted two studies. The first study involved the construction of the innovation potential scale (IPS). In a theoretical, empirical way, the second study involved the administration of the IPS and a sociodemographic questionnaire to a sample of 621 Brazilians from 25 different occupations.
FindingsThe results introduce a nine-item measure for the innovative behavior assessment, along with its validity and psychometric properties. Furthermore, the results suggest that innovation potential is a unidimensional construct. Moreover, the study highlights the role of intrapreneurship as an explanatory axiom. This concept helps to understand the entrepreneurial behavior of various professionals and managers within their work context.
Practical implicationsThis study contribute with as instrument that serves as a new powerful tool for understanding of the mechanisms that lead to innovation in the work context and stimulate the innovative potential of professionals and organizations.
Originality/valueThis study helps fill gaps in the literature on self-report assessment of innovative behavior. The traits linked with the construct have a contingent nature and are only potential.
Downloads
Referências
Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00119.x.
Alencar, E. M. L. S. (1999). Barreiras à criatividade pessoal: desenvolvimento de um instrumento de medida. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 3(2), 123–132. doi: 10.1590/S1413-85571999000200002.
Alghamdi, F. (2018). Ambidextrous leadership, ambidextrous employee, and the interaction between ambidextrous leadership and employee innovative performance. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1186/s13731-018-0081-8.
Amabile, T., Burnside, R. M., & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1995). User’s manual for KEYS, assessing the climate for creativity. A survey from the Center for Creative Leadership. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. doi: 10.2307/256995.
Antoncic, B., & Hisrich, R. D. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(61), 495–527. doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00054-3.
Arabiyat, T. S., Mdanat, M., Haffar, M., Ghoneim, A., & Arabiyat, O. (2019). The influence of institutional and conductive aspects on entrepreneurial innovation: Evidence from GEM data. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(3), 366–389. doi: 10.1108/JEIM-07-2018-0165.
Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2010). Simple second order chi-square correction, Unpublished manuscript. Available from: https://www.statmodel.com/download/WLSMV_new_chi21.pdf
Batmomolin, A., Supriatna, D., Hananto, T., Tanuwijaya, J., & Sadana, S. (2022). Mediating role of intrapreneurship competency and affective commitment in the influence of training and development on employees’ innovative behavior. Quality-Access to Success, 23(191), 70–79. doi: 10.47750/QAS/23.191.09.
Birdi, K., Leach, D., & Magadley, W. (2016). The relationship of individual capabilities and environmental support with different facets of designers’ innovative behavior. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(1), 19–35. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12250.
Bogatyreva, K., Laskova, A., & Osiyevskyy, O. (2022). Entrepreneurial activity, intrapreneurship, and conducive institutions: Is there a connection?. Journal of Business Research, 146, 45–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.062.
Brunetto, Y., Saheli, N., Dick, T., & Nelson, S. (2022). Psychosocial safety climate, psychological capital, healthcare SLBs’ wellbeing and innovative behaviour during the COVID 19 pandemic. Public Performance and Management Review, 45(4), 751–772. doi: 10.1080/15309576.2021.1918189.
Busenitz, L. W., Gomez, C., & Spencer, J. W. (2017). Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 994–1003. doi: 10.5465/1556423.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carayannis, E. G. (Ed.) (2020). Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Collins, O., & Moore, D. G. (1970). The organization makers. New York: Appleton.
Damanpour, F. (2018). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. In G. Hage (Ed.), Organizational innovation (pp. 127–162). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429449482.
de Jong, J., & den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x.
Dorenbosch, L., van Engen, M., & Vergangen, M. (2005). On-the-job innovation: The impact of job design and human resource management through production ownership. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(2), 129–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-8691.2005.00333.x.
Dorow, P. F., Wilbert, J. K. W., Neto, R. J., & Dandolini, G. A. (2015). O líder inovador segundo a percepção de gestores intermediários. INMR - Innovation and Management Review, 12(3), 209–225. doi: 10.11606/rai.v12i3.101485.
Edwards-Schachter, M. (2018). The nature and variety of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2(2), 65–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijis.2018.08.004.
Felin, T., Foss, N. J., & Ployhart, R. E. (2015). The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. The Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 575–632. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2015.1007651.
Ferrando, P. J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2018). Assessing the quality and appropriateness of factor solutions and factor score estimates in exploratory item factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(5), 762–780. doi: 10.1177/0013164417719308.
Fischer, B. B., Moraes, G. H. S. M., & Schaeffer, P. R. (2019). Universities’ institutional settings and academic entrepreneurship: Notes from a developing country. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 243–252. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.009.
Garud, R., Gehman, J., & Tharchen, T. (2018). Performativity as ongoing journeys: Implications for strategy, entrepreneurship, and innovation. Long Range Planning, 51(3), 500–509. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2017.02.003.
Giones, F., & Brem, A. (2017). Digital technology entrepreneurship: A definition and research agenda. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(5), 44–51. doi: 10.22215/timreview/1076.
Gouveia, V. V., Guerra, V. M., Sousa, D. M. F., Santos, W. S., & Costa, J. D. M. (2009). Escala de desejabilidade social de Marlowe-Crowne: Evidências de sua validade fatorial e consistência interna. Avaliação Psicológica, 8(1), 87–98.
Gündoğdu, M. Ç. (2012). Re-thinking entrepreneurship, intrapreneurship, and innovation: A multi-concept perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41, 296–303. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.034.
Hair, Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2013). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education.
Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2000). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudek, S. H. C. du Toit, & D. F. Sorbom (Eds), Structural equation modeling: present and future (pp. 195–216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software.
He, Z., & Wong, P. (2004). Exploration vs. Exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1040.0078.
Hernández-Nieto, R. A. (2002). Contributions to statistical analysis. Mérida: Universidad de Los Andes.
Hisrich, R. D., Peters, M. P., & Shepherd, D. A. (2020). Entrepreneurship (11th ed.). Dubuque, IA: McGraw-Hill Education.
Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., & Montagno, R. V. (1999). Perception of internal factors for corporate entrepreneurship: A comparison of Canadian and U.S. Managers. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(2), 9–24. doi: 10.1177/104225879902400202.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. doi: 10.1348/096317900167038.
Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2020). Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations. Australian Journal of Management, 45(1), 3–14. doi: 10.1177/0312896219871976.
Joy, S. P. (2012). Origins of originality: Innovation motivation and intelligence in poetry and comics. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 30(2), 195–213. doi: 10.2190/EM.30.2.f.
Kang, T. W., Sinha, P. N., Park, C. I., & Lee, Y. K. (2021). Exploring the intra entrepreneurship-employee engagement-creativity linkage and the diverse effects of gender and marital status. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 736914. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736914.
Kim, H., Kim, M., & Koo, D. (2022). From teamwork to psychological well-being and job performance: The role of CSR in the workplace. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 34(10), 3764–3789. doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-11-2021-1426.
Kuratko, D. F. (2009). Introduction to entrepreneurship (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Lau, T. L. M., Shaffer, M. A., Chan, K. F., & Man, T. W. Y. (2012). The entrepreneurial behavior inventory: A simulated incident method to assess corporate entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 18(6), 673–696. doi: 10.1108/13552551211268120.
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672. doi: 10.1177/0149206306290712.
Lukes, M., & Stephan, U. (2017). Measuring employee innovation: A review of existing scales and the development of the innovative behavior and innovation support inventories across cultures. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 23(1), 136–158. doi: 10.1108/ijebr-11-2015-0262.
Malhotra, N. K. (2011). Pesquisa de marketing: foco na decisão (3rd ed.). São Paulo: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Martín-Rojas, R., Fernández-Pérez, V., & García-Sánchez, E. (2017). Encouraging organizational performance through the influence of technological distinctive competencies on components of corporate entrepreneurship. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(2), 397–426. doi: 10.1007/s11365-016-0406-7.
Miao, Q., Newman, A., Schwarz, G., & Cooper, B. (2018). How leadership and public service motivation enhance innovative behavior. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 71–81. doi: 10.1111/puar.12839.
Mohsen, K., Saeed, S., Raza, A., Omar, S., & Muffatto, M. (2021). Does using latest technologies impact new venture innovation? A contingency-based view of institutional environments. Journal of Small Business Management, 59(4), 852–886. doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12534.
Morris, M. H. (1998). Entrepreneurial intensity. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Neessen, P. C. M., Caniëls, M. C. J., Vos, B., & de Jong, J. P. (2019). The intrapreneurial employee: Toward an integrated model of intrapreneurship and research agenda. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(2), 545–571. doi: 10.1007/s11365-018-0552-1.
Paruzel, A., Schmidt, L., & Maier, G. W. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and employee innovative behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 393, 136189. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136189.
Pasquali, L. (2013). Psicometria: teoria dos testes na psicologia e na educação (5th ed.). Petrópolis: RJ: Editora Vozes.
Patterson, M. G., West, M. A., Shackleton, V. J., Dawson, J. F., Lawthom, R., Maitlis, S., … Wallace, A. M. (2005). Validating the organizational climate measure: Links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 379–408. doi: 10.1002/job.312.
Robben, M. A. (2019). A study of innovative behavior. In high technology product development organizations. Londom: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315860985.
Saura, J. R., Palacios-Marqués, D., Correia, M. B., & Barbosa, B. (2023). Innovative behavior in entrepreneurship: Analyzing new perspectives and challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1123236. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1123236.
Schillo, R. S., Persaud, A., & Jin, M. (2016). Entrepreneurial readiness in the context of national systems of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 46(4), 619–637. doi: 10.1007/s11187-016-9709-x.
Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. doi:10.2307/256701.
Souza, G. H. S., Coelho, J. A. P. D. M., Esteves, G. G. L., Lima, N. C., & Santos, P. C. F. (2016). Inventário de barreiras e facilitadores ao empreendedorismo: construção e validação de um instrumento. REAd. Revista Eletrônica de Administração, 22(3), 381–412. doi: 10.1590/1413-2311.04315.57744.
Souza, G. H. S., Coelho, J. A. P. M., Lima, N. C., Silva, J. A., & Esteves, G. G. L. (2021). Planejamento de questionários: Unificando conhecimentos em pesquisa de mercado e psicometria. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 22(1), 1–32. doi: 10.13058/raep.2021.v22n1.1876.
Souza, G. H. S., Esteves, G. G. L., & Coelho, J. A. P. M. (2021). Evidence of validity of the measure of adaptive cognition (MAC): An adaptation for the Brazilian context in entrepreneurs. Revista Psicologia: Organizações e Trabalho, 21(3), 1647–1654. doi: 10.5935/rpot/2021.3.20990.
Souza, G. H. S., Lima, M. J., Marques, Y. B., Jardim, A. C. G. D. S., Lima, N. C., Rocha, L. G., & Neves, L. F. D. O. (2023). Perfil empreendedor e valores humanos: um estudo comparativo entre empreendedores e inventores. In R. F. Gonçalves, G. H. S. de Souza, N. C. Lima (Eds). Fronteiras em empreendedorismo: perspectivas teóricas e práticas (pp. 44-66). Montes Claros: Editora do IFNMG. doi: 10.29327/5312799.1-2.
Souza, G. H. S., Santos, P. C. F., Lima, N. C., Cruz, N. J. T., Lezana, A. G. R., & Coelho, J. A. P. D. M. (2017). Entrepreneurial potential scale: Evidence on confirmatory factor validity, dimensional structure and predictive effectiveness. Gestão and Produção, 24(2), 324–337. doi: 10.1590/0104-530X3038-16.
Stenholm, P., Acs, Z. J., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 176–193. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.002.
Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with Parallel Analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209–220. doi: 10.1037/a0023353.
Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 89–104. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.009.
Vargo, S. L., Akaka, M. A., & Wieland, H. (2020). Rethinking the process of diffusion in innovation: A service-ecosystems and institutional perspective. Journal of Business Research, 116, 526–534. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.038.
Vassilakopoulou, P., & Grisot, M. (2020). Effectual tactics in digital intrapreneurship: A process model. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 29(3), 101617. doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101617.
Wang, Z., Meng, L., & Cai, S. (2019). Servant leadership and innovative behavior: A moderated mediation. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(8), 505–518. doi:10.1108/JMP-11-2018-0499.
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696. doi: 10.2307/3069410.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Gustavo Henrique Silva de Souza, Nilton Cesar Lima Lima, Fernanda Cristina Barbosa Pereira Queiroz, Rafael Farias Gonçalves, Jamerson Viegas Queiroz

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
• O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
• O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
• A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
• É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.