Adaptive planning: a proposal tomanage nanotechnology projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/inmr-04-2023-0044Palavras-chave:
Complex RD&I projects, Adaptive planning, NanotechnologyResumo
PurposeResearch, development and innovation (RD&I) projects involving nanotechnology are complex, requiring an agile mindset and approaches capable of adapting to new discoveries, yet alternative project management (PM) approaches are still mainly limited to software development. This study aims to fill part of this gap by developing and evaluating the use of an adaptive planning model to contribute to PM in nanotechnology.
Design/methodology/approachThe approaches of “process tracing” and complexity dimensions were combined in an in-depth case study to identify events and build a real-time map of the complexities of a collaborative RD&I project involving nanotechnology, prominent in the national context.
FindingsThe systematization of the case in question resulted in the proposal of an adaptive and replicable model with implementation guidelines capable of contributing in real time to managers' understanding of complexities and decision-making in complex projects.
Research limitations/implicationsThis study’s limitations included the limited number of informants and the focus on a single case. However, this can serve as a starting point for further investigation aiming to advance the application of adaptive approaches to PM in RD&I projects involving nanotechnology.
Originality/valueThe study fills a knowledge gap in the field of adaptive planning for environments beyond software development and creates an opportunity for discussions on PM approaches in hard science contexts.
Downloads
Referências
Baccarini, D. (1996). The concept of project complexity—a review. International Journal of Project Management, 14(14), 201–204. doi: 10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3.
Bakhshi, J., Ireland, V., & Gorod, A. (2016). Clarifying the complexity construct: Past present and future. International Journal of Project Management, 34(34), 1199–1213. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.002.
Beach, D. (2020). Process tracing methods. In Oxford bibliographies – international relations. Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/OBO/9780199743292-0227.
Coad, A., Segarra-Blasco, A., & Teruel, M. (2021). A bit of basic, a bit of applied? R&D strategies and firm performance. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(6), 1758–1783.
Conforto, E. C., & Amaral, D. C. (2010). Evaluating an agile method for planning and controlling innovative projects. Project Management Journal, 41(2), 73–80. doi: 10.1002/pmj.20089.
Cooper, R. G., & Sommer, A. F. (2016). The agile–stage‐gate hybrid model: A promising new approach and a new research opportunity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(5), 513–526. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12314.
Cooper, R. G., & Sommer, A. F. (2018). Agile–stage-gate for manufacturers: Changing the way new products are developed integrating agile project management methods into a stage-gate system offers both opportunities and challenges. Research-Technology Management, 61(2), 17–26. doi: 10.1080/08956308.2018.1421380.
Cristóbal, J. R., Carral, L., Diaz, E., Fraguela, J. A., & Iglesias, G. (2018). Complexity and project management: A general overview. Complexity, 2018(1). doi: 10.1155/2018/4891286.
D'Este, P., Amara, N., & Olmos-Peñuela, J. (2016). Fostering novelty while reducing failure: Balancing the twin challenges of product innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 113(113), 280–292. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.011.
Elia, G., Margherita, A., & Secundo, G. (2020). Project management canvas: A systems thinking framework to address project complexity. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(14), 809–835. doi: 10.1108/IJMPB-04-2020-0128.
Freitas, J. S., de Melo, J. C. F., Salerno, M. S., Bagno, R. B., & Brasil, V. C. (2021). An innovative application of event structure analysis (ESA). MethodsX, 8(8), 101256. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101256.
Geraldi, J., Maylor, H., & Williams, T. (2011). Now, let's make it really complex (complicated): A systematic review of the complexities of projects. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(31), 966–990. doi: 10.1108/01443571111165848.
Guerra, R. R. (2023). Complexidade em projetos de nanotecnologia: caracterização e proposição de um templete de análise. [Tese de Doutorado]. Brasil: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
Guide, A. (2001). Project management body of knowledge (pmbok® guide) (Vol. 11, pp. 7–8). Project Management Institute.
Heise, D. R. (2022). Theoretical notes on action schemes in society. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(2), 269–279. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.269.
Heise, D. R., & Durig, A. (1997). A frame for organizational actions and macroactions. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 22(2), 95–123. doi: 10.1080/0022250X.1997.9990197.
Jaafari, A. (2003). Project management in the age of complexity and change. Project Management Journal, 34(4), 47–57. doi: 10.1177/875697280303400407.
Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. doi: 10.5465/amr.1999.2553248.
Langley, A. (2007). Process thinking in strategic organization. Strategic Organization, 5(3), 271–282. doi: 10.1177/1476127007079965.
Lenfle, S., Midler, C., & Hällgren, M. (2019). Exploratory projects: From strangeness to theory. Project Management Journal, 50(5), 519–523. doi: 10.1177/8756972819871781.
Lerman, M. P., Mmbaga, N., & Smith, A. (2022). Tracing ideas from Langley (1999): Exemplars, adaptations, considerations, and overlooked. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 285–307. doi: 10.1177/1094428120915510.
Loch, C., & Sommer, S. (2019). The tension between flexible goals and managerial control in exploratory projects. Project Management Journal, 50(5), 524–537. doi: 10.1177/8756972819870062.
Matos, P. V., Romão, M., Sarmento, J. M., & Abaladas, A. (2019). The adoption of project management methodologies and tools by NGDOs: A mixed methods perspective. Journal of Business Research, 101, 651–659. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.067.
McGrath, R. G., & MacMillan, I. C. (1995). Discovery-driven planning recognizes that planning. Harvard Business Review 73, 44–54.
MCTI (2021). Portaria MCTI nº 5.365, de 02.12.2021, Institui a Política de Desenvolvimento Científico, Tecnológico e Inovação para as Tecnologias Habilitadoras. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação. Diário Oficial da União, Poder Executivo, Brasília, DF, 02 dez. 2021.
Melo, J. C. F., Salerno, M. S., Freitas, J. S., Bagno, R. B., & Brasil, V. C. (2021). Reprint of: From open innovation projects to open innovation project management capabilities: A process-based approach. International Journal of Project Management, 39(2), 170–182. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.01.003.
Meyer, A., Loch, C. H., & Pich, M. T. (2002). Managing project uncertainty: From variation to chaos. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(2), 60.
Nachbagauer, A. (2021). Managing complexity in projects: Extending the Cynefin framework. Project Leadership and Society, 2(2), 100017. doi: 10.1016/j.plas.2021.100017.
Pich, M. T., Loch, C. H., & Meyer, A. D. (2002). On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Science, 48(8), 1008–1023. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.48.8.1008.163.
Reay, T., & Jones, C. (2016). Qualitatively capturing institutional logics. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 441–454. doi: 10.1177/1476127015589981.
Resende, R. G., & Bagno, R. B. (2017). Processo de Desenvolvimento de Produtos Integrado com a Metodologia de Avaliação de Prontidão Tecnológica: Proposta para um Centro de Tecnologia em Nanomateriais. In Anais 11º Congresso Brasileiro de Inovação e Gestão de Desenvolvimento do Produto.
Rezende, L. B., Blackwell, P., & Pessanha Gonçalves, M. D. (2018). Research focuses, trends, and major findings on project complexity: A bibliometric network analysis of 50 years of project complexity research. Project Management Journal, 49(1), 42–56. doi: 10.1177/875697281804900104.
Rice, M. P., O’Connor, G. C., & Pierantozzi, R. (2008). Implementing a learning plan to counter project uncertainty. MIT Sloan Management Review.
Shenhar, A. J., & Dvir, D. (1996). Toward a typological theory of project management. Research Policy, 25(4), 607–632. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(95)00877-2.
Snowden, D. (2002). Complex acts of knowing: Paradox and descriptive self‑awareness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(2), 100-111.
Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader's framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68–149.
Stacey, R. D. (1996). Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Turner, J. R., & Cochrane, R. A. (1993). Goals-and-methods matrix: Coping with projects with ill defined goals and/or methods of achieving them. International Journal of Project Management, 11(2), 93–102. doi: 10.1016/0263-7863(93)90017-H.
Vidal, L. A., & Marle, F. (2008). Understanding project complexity: Implications on project management. Kybernetes, 37(37), 1094–1110. doi: 10.1108/03684920810884928.
Williams, T., & Hillson, D. (2002). Editorial–PMI Europe 2001. International Journal of Project Management, 20(3), 183–184. doi: 10.1016/s0263-7863(01)00079-5.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Marcella Rocha Franco, Glaura Goulart da Silva, Raoni Barros Bagno, Jonathan Simões Freitas
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
• O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
• O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
• A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
• É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.
