ThinkBox: After an innovation project ends, what about its impact? The university, collaboration and innovation governance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-10-2026-0310

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abranches, M. (2023). Como avaliar um programa de extensão universitária: Estudo do Pensar a Educação, Pensar o Brasil – 1822/2022 da Faculdade de Educação da UFMG [How to evaluate a university extension program: A study of Pensar a Educação, Pensar o Brasil – 1822/2022 at UFMG’s Faculty of Education]. Conecte-se! Revista Interdisciplinar de Extensão, 7(15), 56–77. doi: https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2594-5467.2023v7n15p56-77.

Abreu, M., & Grinevich, V. (2024). The entrepreneurial university: Strategies, processes, and competing goals. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 49(6), 1991–2034. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10085-7.

Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–271. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0188.

Barakat, S. R., Santos Jhunior, R. D. O., & Freeman, R. E. (2026). ThinkBox: Applying stakeholder theory in underexplored contexts. RAUSP Management Journal, 61, 124–133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-06-2026-0197.

Blagoev, B., & Schreyögg, G. (2025). Eigenzeit: A new lens on temporal complexity. Academy of Management Review, 50(1), 93–113. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2022.0440.

Borini, F. M., Santos, F. J., Gomes, L., & Tommaso, S. (2024). ThinkBox: The cumulative transitions of the deep tech entrepreneur. RAUSP Management Journal, 59(1), 67–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-02-2024-277.

Brasil (2019). Lei n° 13.800, de 4 de janeiro de 2019 (norma atualizada) [Law No. 13,800 of January 4, 2019 (consolidated text)]. Câmara dos Deputados. Available from: Link to the website

Brown, J. R., Dimmock, S. G., Kang, J. -K., & Weisbenner, S. J. (2014). How university endowments respond to financial market shocks: Evidence and implications. American Economic Review, 104(3), 931–962. doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.3.931.

Costa, P. R., Porto, G. S., & Feldhaus, D. (2010). Gestão da cooperação empresa–universidade: O caso de uma multinacional brasileira [Management of company–university cooperation: A Brazilian multinational case]. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 14(1), 100–121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552010000100007.

Denis, J., Mongili, A., & Pontille, D. (2015). Maintenance & repair in science and technology studies. Tecnoscienza – Italian Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 6(2), 5–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2038-3460/17251.

Fini, R., Rasmussen, E., Siegel, D., & Wiklund, J. (2018). Rethinking the commercialization of public science: From entrepreneurial outcomes to societal impacts. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 4–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0206.

Flynn, P. J., Awaysheh, A., Bliese, P. D., & Flynn, B. B. (2025). From intent to impact: A proactive event approach for amplifying sustainability across time. Journal of Management, 51(3), 999–1032. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231224370.

Mikhailov, A., Ruffoni, J., & Puffal, D. P. (2025). Industry, university, and innovation: Understanding the relationship between collaboration channels and firm innovation capabilities in Brazil. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 65(3), e2024-0182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020250310.

Ministério da Educação (2018). Resolução CNE/CES n° 7, de 18 de dezembro de 2018 [CNE/CES Resolution No. 7 of December 18, 2018]. Diário Oficial da União, December 19, 2018, Section 1, 49–50, (corrected in the Diário Oficial da União of February 18, 2019, Section 1, p. 28). Available from: Link to the website

Perkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., & Hughes, A. (2021). Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011–2019. Research Policy, 50(1), 104114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114.

Reed, M. S., Ferré, M., Martin-Ortega, J., Blanche, R., Lawford-Rolfe, R., Dallimer, M., & Holden, J. (2021). Evaluating impact from research: A methodological framework. Research Policy, 50(4), 104147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104147.

Rentrop, C., Bandelow, L., & Perlinger, K. (2024). An exploratory analysis of the impact of philanthropic investments on the development of university innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Academy of Management Perspectives, 38(4), 492–511. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2023.0038.

Shekhtman, L. M., Gates, A. J., & Barabási, A. -L. (2024). Mapping philanthropic support of science. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 9397. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58367-2. PubMed

Visser, M., Tijsma, G., & Zweekhorst, M. (2026). Realizing reciprocity in community–university partnerships when addressing complex societal issues. Innovative Higher Education, 51(1), 407–440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-025-09820-1.

Whyte, J., & Nussbaum, T. (2020). Transition and temporalities: Spanning temporal boundaries as projects end and operations begin. Project Management Journal, 51(5), 505–521. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/8756972820919002.

Wociechoski, D. P., & Catani, A. M. (2022). Resolução CNE n. 7/2018 e a burocratização da educação superior: Apontamentos sobre a diretriz relativa apenas à extensão universitária [Resolution CNE No. 7/2018 and the bureaucratization of higher education: Notes on the guideline concerning only university extension]. Regae: Revista de Gestão e Avaliação Educacional, 11(20), e71374. doi: https://doi.org/10.5902/2318133871374.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-05

Issue

Section

ThinkBox

How to Cite

ThinkBox: After an innovation project ends, what about its impact? The university, collaboration and innovation governance. (2026). INMR - Innovation & Management Review, 23. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-10-2026-0310