Are technology parks the same? A typology proposal for an emerging economy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-12-2023-0245Palabras clave:
Science and technology parks, Brazil, Cluster analysis, HeterogeneityResumen
PurposeRecent literature has increasingly analyzed Science and Technology Parks (STPs) as heterogeneous ecosystems. However, studies on STPs in emerging countries remain limited. This study aims to develop a typology of STP profiles based on their distinctive characteristics in a developing country and to compare these profiles with the context of developed countries.
Design/methodology/approachAn exploratory methodology was adopted to identify STP profiles in the Brazilian context. The analysis focused on four dimensions associated with their configurations: structural characteristics, knowledge generation, resource availability and local context. Cluster analysis was conducted using SPSS software.
FindingsThe study identifies three distinct clusters of STPs: University-Based, Legitimator and Firms-Hotel. These clusters differ significantly in terms of resource provision, associations with research centers and universities and age.
Research limitations/implicationsThe study is constrained by the sample size. Furthermore, it does not explore differences in the operational dynamics of the clusters over time.
Practical implicationsThe findings demonstrate that Brazilian STPs are composed of diverse elements, highlighting the need for policies and strategies that move beyond assumptions of structural isomorphism. Such policies and strategies should focus on resource complementarity with local capacities. The research also underscores the potential of using clustering methodologies as a foundation for evaluating the impact of STPs on the performance of tenant firms.
Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature by emphasizing the heterogeneous nature of STPs in emerging economies and differences to developed countries context.
Descargas
Referencias
Albahari, A., Barge-Gil, A., Pérez-Canto, S., et al. (2023). The effect of science and technology parks on tenant firms: A literature review. Journal of Technology Transfer, 48, 1489–1531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09949-7
Albahari, A., Barge‐Gil, A., Pérez‐Canto, S., & Modrego, A. (2018). The influence of science and technology park characteristics on firms' innovation results. Papers in Regional Science, 97(2), 253-280. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12253
Albahari, A., Klofsten, M., & Rubio-Romero, J. C. (2019). Science and technology parks: A study of value creation for park tenants. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(4), 1256-1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9661-9
Albahari, A., Pérez-Canto, S., Barge-Gil, A., & Modrego, A. (2017). Technology parks versus science parks: Does the university make the difference? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.012
Albuquerque, E. D. M. E. (1999). National systems of innovation and non-OECD countries: Notes about a rudimentary and tentative “typology”. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 19(4), 602-620. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31571999-1089
Amaral, M.G., da Hora, A.L.F., & Schocair, M.M. (2023). Assessment of science, technology, and innovation parks based on helices actors linkages. International Journal of Innovation Science, 15(2), 347-367. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-11-2020-0254
Amoroso, S., Link, A. N., & Wright, M. (Eds.). (2019). Science and technology parks and regional economic development: An international perspective. Palgrave Macmillan.
ANPROTEC. (2008). Parques Tecnológicos no Brasil: Estudo, Análise e Proposições. Apresentado no XVIII Seminário Nacional de Parques Tecnológicos e Incubadoras de Empresas. Brasília. https://anprotec.org.br/site/publicacoes-anprotec/estudos-e-pesquisas/. Accessed Dec 5, 2024.
Anton-Tejon, M., Barge-Gil, A., Martínez, C., & Albahari, A. (2024). Science and technology parks and their heterogeneous effect on firm innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 73, 101820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2024.101820
Arauzo-Carod, J. M., Segarra-Blasco, A., & Teruel, M. (2018). The role of science and technology parks as firm growth boosters: An empirical analysis in Catalonia. Regional Studies, 52(5), 645-658. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1447098
Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875-891. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.596701
Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: Establishing the framework conditions. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 1030-1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8
Beaudry, C., & Schiffauerova, A. (2009). Who's right, Marshall or Jacobs? The localization versus urbanization debate. Research Policy, 38(2), 318-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010
Bencke, F. F., Dorion, E. C. H., Prodanov, C. C., & Olea, P. M. (2020). Community leadership and the Triple Helix model as determinants of the constitution of science parks: A Brazilian experience. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-07-2018-0225
Bolliger, R. D., Fischer, B. B., de Faria, A. F., de Amaral, M. G., & Serafim, M. P. (2024). Heterogeneous profiles and trajectories of science and technology parks: Evidence from Brazil. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10143-0
Corrocher, N., Lamperti, F., & Mavilia, R. (2019). Do science parks sustain or trigger innovation? Empirical evidence from Italy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 140-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.005
Dias, R. (2012). Sessenta anos de política científica e tecnológica no Brasil. Editora Unicamp.
Díez-Vial, I., & Fernández-Olmos, M. (2015). Knowledge spillovers in science and technology parks: How can firms benefit most? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40, 70-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-013-9329-4
Dolnicar, S., Grün, B., Leisch, F., & Schmidt, K. (2014). Required sample sizes for data-driven market segmentation analyses in tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 53(3), 296-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287513496475
Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation policy: What, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx001
Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2018). Innovation incommensurability and the science park. R&D Management, 48(1), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12266
Faria, A. F., Haber, J. A., De Battisti, A. C., Dabrowska, J., & Sediyama, J. A. S. (2022). Technology parks in Brazil: An analysis of the determinants of performance evaluation. International Journal of Innovation, 10(1), 30–67. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i1.19456
Fávero, L. P., & Belfiore, P. (2017). Manual de análise de dados: Estatística e modelagem multivariada com Excel®, SPSS® e Stata®. Elsevier Brasil.
Feldman, M. P. (1994). The Geography of Innovation. Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation.
Fischer, B. B., Alves, A. C., Vonortas, N. S., & Brown, R. (2024). Foundations of entrepreneurial ecosystems configurations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10147-w
Fischer, B. B., Schaeffer, P. R., & Vonortas, N. S. (2019). Evolution of university-industry collaboration in Brazil from a technology upgrading perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 330-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.001
Formann, A. K. (1984). Die latent-class-analyse: Einführung in Theorie und Anwendung. Beltz.
Françoso, M. S., & Vonortas, N. S. (2023). Gatekeepers in regional innovation networks: Evidence from an emerging economy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(3), 821-841. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09922-4
Fukugawa, N. (2006). Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(2), 381-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.07.005
Furnari, S., Crilly, D., Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Fiss, P. C., & Aguilera, R. V. (2021). Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 46(4), 778–799. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0298
Furtado, C. (1974). O mito do desenvolvimento econômico.
Garcia, R., Araujo, V., Mascarini, S., Gomes Dos Santos, E., & Costa, A. (2018). Is cognitive proximity a driver of geographical distance of university–industry collaboration? Area Development and Policy, 3(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/23792949.2018.1484669
Germain, E., Klofsten, M., Löfsten, H., & Mian, S. (2023). Science parks as key players in entrepreneurial ecosystems. R&D Management, 53(4), 603-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12536
Gomes, S., Lopes, J. M., Ferreira, L., & Oliveira, J. (2023). Science and technology parks: Opening the Pandora’s box of regional development. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(3), 2787–2810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00995-y
Jacobsen, A., Tanner, A. N., & Andersen, P. D. (2024). Foresight for science and technology parks in the context of smart specialisation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(4), 707-719. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2022.2053100
Koster, H. R., Cheng, F. F., Gerritse, M., & van Oort, F. G. (2019). Place‐based policies, firm productivity, and displacement effects: Evidence from Shenzhen, China. Journal of Regional Science, 59(2), 187-213. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12415
Lamperti, F., Mavilia, R. & Castellini, S. (2017). The role of Science Parks: a puzzle of growth, innovation and R&D investments. J Technol Transf 42, 158–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9455-2
Lecluyse, L., & Spithoven, A. (2019). Toward a framework to advance the knowledge on science park contribution: an analysis of science park heterogeneity. In Science and Technology Parks and Regional Economic Development (pp. 185–209). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30963-3
Liberati, D., Marinucci, M. & Tanzi, G.M. (2016). Science and technology parks in Italy: main features and analysis of their effects on the firms hosted. J Technol Transf 41, 694–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9397-8
Lindelöf, P., & Löfsten, H. (2002). Growth, management and financing of new technology-based firms—assessing value-added contributions of firms located on and off Science Parks. Omega, 30(3), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(02)00023-3
Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2006). US University Research Parks. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 25(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-006-7126-x
Löfsten, H., & Klofsten, M. (2024). Exploring dyadic relationships between Science Parks and universities: bridging theory and practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10064-y
McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2008). High tech start-ups in University Science Park incubators: The relationship between the start-up’s lifecycle progression and use of the incubator’s resources. Technovation, 28(5), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.012
MCTI (2024). Brasil Inovador: Quatro décadas das políticas públicas que impulsionaram os ambientes de inovação e o empreendedorismo no país. https://anprotec.org.br/site/2024/12/anprotec-participa-de-evento-comemorativo-aos-20-anos-da-lei-de-inovacao-e-lancamento-de-livro-do-mcti/?utm_campaign=info_e_111224&utm_medium=email&utm_source=RD+Station. Acess in dec 17 2024.
MCTI (2014). Estudo de Projetos de Alta Complexidade: indicadores de parques tecnológicos. https://anprotec.org.br/site/publicacoes-anprotec/estudos-e-pesquisas/. Acess in dec 5 2024.
Meseguer-Martinez, A., Popa, S., & Soto-Acosta, P. (2020). The instrumentation of science parks: An integrative framework of enabling factors. Journal of Intellectual Capital. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-11-2019-0264
Mineiro, A. A. D. C., Arantes, R. D. C., Vieira, K. C., Castro, C. C., Carvalho, E. G., & Amaral, M. G. D. (2023). Business practices for strengthening the quadruple and quintuple helix: a study using structural equation modeling. International Journal of Innovation Science, 15(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-02-2021-0049
Mooi, E. A., & Sarstedt, M. (2018). A Concise Guide to Market Research: the Process, Data, and Methods Using IBM SPSS Statistics.
Ng, W. K. B., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., Cloodt, M., & Arentze, T. (2019). Towards a segmentation of science parks: A typology study on science parks in Europe. Research Policy, 48(3), 719-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.11.004
Oh, D. S., Phillips, F., Park, S., & Lee, E. (2016). Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004
Poonjan, A., & Tanner, A. N. (2020). The role of regional contextual factors for science and technology parks: A conceptual framework. European Planning Studies, 28(2), 400–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1679093
Qi, X. Z., Li, E. P. H., Wei, Z., & Ning, Z. (2024). Bridging the valley of death: examining university science parks' influence on revenue generation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 30(5), 1093-1121. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijebr-05-2023-0475
Quintas, P., Wield, D., & Massey, D. (1992). Academic-industry links and innovation: questioning the science park model. Technovation, 12(3), 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(92)90033-E
Ratinho, T., & Henriques, E. (2010). The role of science parks and business incubators in converging countries: Evidence from Portugal. Technovation, 30(4), 278-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.09.002
Ribeiro, J.A., Ladeira, M. B., de Faria, A. F., & Barbosa, M. W. (2021). A reference model for science and technology parks strategic performance management: An emerging economy perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 59, 101612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2021.101612
Roldan, L. B., Hansen, P. B., & Garcia-Perez-de-Lema, D. (2018). The relationship between favorable conditions for innovation in technology parks, the innovation produced, and companies’ performance: A framework for an analysis model. Innovation & Management Review, 15(3), 286-302. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-05-2018-0027
Saxenian, A. (1996). Inside-Out: Regional Networks and Industrial Adaptation in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cityscape, 41-60.
Spiri-Ferreira, T., Gonzaga, C. A. M., & Stéfani, S. R. (2023). Análise de uma estrutura conceitual de inovação social, buscando um desenvolvimento comunitário. Revista Stricto Sensu, 8(1).
Squicciarini, M. (2009). Science parks: Seedbeds of innovation? A duration analysis of firms’ patenting activity. Small Business Economics, 32(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9075-9
Steruska, J., Simkova, N., & Pitner, T. (2019). Do science and technology parks improve technology transfer? Technology in Society, 59, 101127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.04.003
Storper, M., & Venables, A. J. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027
Suzigan, W., Garcia, R., & Assis Feitosa, P. H. (2020). Institutions and industrial policy in Brazil after two decades: have we built the needed institutions? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 29(7), 799-813. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2020.1719629
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3c509::AID-SMJ882%3e3.0.CO;2-Z
Theeranattapong, T., Pickernell, D., & Simms, C. (2021). Systematic literature review paper: The regional innovation system-university-science park nexus. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(6), 2017-2050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09837-y
Tkaczynski, A. (2017). Segmentation using two-step cluster analysis. Segmentation in social marketing: Process, methods and application, 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1835-0_8
Vásquez-Urriago, Á. R., Barge-Gil, A., & Rico, A. M. (2016). Science and technology parks and cooperation for innovation: Empirical evidence from Spain. Research Policy, 45(1), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.006
Westhead, P. (1997). R&D ‘inputs’ and ‘outputs’ of technology-based firms located on and off science parks. R&D Management, 27(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00041
Wright, M. Westhead, P. (2019). Science Technology Parks and Close Relations: Heterogeneity, Context and Data. In Science and Technology Parks and Regional Economic Development (pp. 39–60). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30963-3
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Bolliger Bolliger, Fischer Bruno, Marcelo Gonçalves do Amaral, Adriana Ferreira de Faria, Milena Pavan Serafim
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
• O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
• O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
• A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
• É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.
