A configurational view of the role of managerial cognition and Industry 4.0 in SME internationalization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-09-2024-0225Palabras clave:
Managerial cognition, Microfoundations, Network exploration, Network exploitation, Industry 4.0, Uppsala model, Dual network capabilityResumen
PurposeOur study seeks to supplement the Uppsala model of internationalization by incorporating two underexplored dimensions, namely, the transformative effects of macroenvironmental shifts driven by Industry 4.0 (I4.0) technologies and the theoretical insights provided by the microfoundation approach, which focuses on how managers perceive, process, and respond to external stimuli on the basis of their cognition.
Design/methodology/approachThis research employs a dual network capability framework through the exploration–exploitation lens to investigate how managerial cognition and I4.0 technologies influence internationalization. A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) is applied to data collected from a sample of 116 small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) from a developed country.
FindingsThis study reveals that decision-making strategies associated with higher and lower levels of internationalization are distinct from each other. These findings suggest that the interplay between managerial cognition, network capabilities, and I4.0 technologies plays a significant role in shaping internationalization outcomes.
Originality/valueThis research contributes to the internationalization literature by addressing critical gaps in the Uppsala model, particularly through the integration of cognitive and technological factors. This study offers new insights into the decision-making processes underpinning internationalization, advancing both the Uppsala model and the broader field of strategic management.
Descargas
Referencias
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396-402.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (2012). Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 8-34.
Bhatti, W. A., Vahlne, J. E., Glowik, M., & Larimo, J. A. (2022). The impact of industry 4.0 on the 2017 version of the Uppsala model. International Business Review, 31(4), Article 101996.
Castagnoli, R., Büchi, G., Coeurderoy, R., & Cugno, M. (2022). Evolution of industry 4.0 and international business: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. European Management Journal, 40(4), 572-589.
Clark, D. R., Li, D., & Shepherd, D. A. (2018). Country familiarity in the initial stage of foreign market selection. Journal of International Business Studies, 49, 442-472.
Clarke, I., & Mackaness, W. (2001). Management ‘intuition’: An interpretative account of structure and content of decision schemas using cognitive maps. Journal of Management Studies, 38(2), 147-172.
Clemente-Almendros, J. A., Nicoara-Popescu, D., & Pastor-Sanz, I. (2024). Digital transformation in SMEs: Understanding its determinants and size heterogeneity. Technology in Society, 77, Article 102483.
Coviello, N., Kano, L., & Liesch, P. W. (2017). Adapting the Uppsala model to a modern world: Macro-context and microfoundations. Journal of International Business Studies, 48, 1151-1164.
Culot, G., Nassimbeni, G., Orzes, G., & Sartor, M. (2020). Behind the definition of Industry 4.0: Analysis and open questions. International Journal of Production Economics, 226, Article 107617.
Eduardsen, J., & Marinova, S. (2020). Internationalisation and risk: Literature review, integrative framework and research agenda. International Business Review, 29(3), Article 101688.
Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223-241.
Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & Van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311(5763), 1005-1007.
Faroque, A. R., Morrish, S. C., Kuivalainen, O., Sundqvist, S., & Torkkeli, L. (2021). Microfoundations of network exploration and exploitation capabilities in international opportunity recognition. International Business Review, 30(1), Article 101767.
Fellows, L. K. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of human decision making: a review and conceptual framework. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(3), 159-172.
Figueira-de-Lemos, F., Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2011). Risk management in the internationalization process of the firm: A note on the Uppsala model. Journal of World Business, 46(2), 143-153.
Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393-420.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Hair, J.F., Black. W.C, Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hannibal, M. (2020). The influence of additive manufacturing on early internationalization: considerations into potential avenues of IE research. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 18(4), 473-491.
Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern Factor Analysis (3rd ed. Revised). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494.
Hilmersson, M., & Johanson, M. (2016). Speed of SME internationalization and performance. Management International Review, 56(1), 67-94.
Hsieh, L., Child, J., Narooz, R., Elbanna, S., Karmowska, J., Marinova, S., Puthusserry, P., Tsai, T., & Zhang, Y. (2019). A multidimensional perspective of SME internationalization speed: The influence of entrepreneurial characteristics. International Business Review, 28(2), 268-283.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm—a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8, 23-32.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1411-1431.
Kagermann, H., Helbig, J., Hellinger, A., Wahlster, W., Kagerman, H., Wahlster, W., & Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the future of German manufacturing industry; final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. In Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Forschungsunion.
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697-720.
Klingenberg, C. O., Borges, M. A. V., & do Vale Antunes Jr, J. A. (2022). Industry 4.0: What makes it a revolution? A historical framework to understand the phenomenon. Technology in Society, 70, Article 102009.
Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95-112.
Liesch, P. W., Welch, L. S., & Buckley, P. J. (2011). Risk and uncertainty in internationalisation and international entrepreneurship studies: Review and conceptual development. Management International Review, 51, 851-873.
Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114-121.
Luo, Y., & Zahra, S. A. (2023). Industry 4.0 in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 1-15.
Lu, Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1-10.
Machado, D., Correia, A., Braga, A., Salamzadeh, A., & Braga, V. (2025). Business Innovation and Internationalisation in Female-Owned Businesses: A Fuzzy-set QCA Approach. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-29.
Maitland, E., & Sammartino, A. (2015). Managerial cognition and internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 46, 733-760.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
Marzi, G., Manesh, M. F., Caputo, A., Pellegrini, M. M., & Vlačić, B. (2023). Do or do not. Cognitive configurations affecting open innovation adoption in SMEs. Technovation, 119, Article 102585.
Miller, D. (1987). The genesis of configuration. Academy of Management Review, 12(4), 686-701.
Monaghan, S., Tippmann, E., & Coviello, N. (2020). Born digitals: Thoughts on their internationalization and a research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 11-22.
Pappas, I. O., Kourouthanassis, P. E., Giannakos, M. N., & Chrissikopoulos, V. (2016). Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 794-803.
Pappas, I. O., & Woodside, A. G. (2021). Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58, Article 102310.
Penney, C. R., Combs, J. G., Gaffney, N., & Sexton, J. C. (2020). A jack-of-all-trades or a master of none: the performance effects of balancing exploration and exploitation within vs across alliance portfolio domains. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(3), 569-587.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879.
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (Vol. 51). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Schmuck, A., Lagerström, K., & Sallis, J. (2022). Turning the tables: the relationship between performance and multinationality. Management International Review, 62(1), 3-26.
Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010). Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397-418.
Shapiro, S., & Spence, M. T. (1997). Managerial intuition: A conceptual and operational framework. Business Horizons, 40(1), 63-69.
Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 456-476.
Silva, C., González-Loureiro, M., & Braga, V. L. (2021). The influence of organizational ambidexterity on SME speed of internationalization. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 29(1), 68-84.
Simon, H. A. (1987). Making management decisions: The role of intuition and emotion. Academy of Management Perspectives, 1(1), 57-64.
Strange, R., & Zucchella, A. (2017). Industry 4.0, global value chains and international business. Multinational Business Review, 25(3), 174-184.
Vahlne, J. E., & Johanson, J. (2017). From internationalization to evolution: The Uppsala model at 40 years. Journal of International Business Studies, 48, 1087-1102.
Vahlne, J. E., & Johanson, J. (2020). The Uppsala model: Networks and micro-foundations. Journal of International Business Studies, 51, 4-10.
Vahlne, J. E., & Schweizer, R. (2022). Human behavior and judgment: A critical nano-foundation for the Uppsala model and international business studies. Journal of International Business Studies, 53(7), 1549-1555.
Vlačić, B., Almeida Santos, I. G., Silva, S. C., & González-Loureiro, M. (2022). Entrepreneurial cognition and internationalization speed: towards a potential moderating effect of experiential and rational information processing. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 18(2), 603-636.
Vlačić, B., González-Loureiro, M., & Eduardsen, J. (2023). The process of the process of internationalisation: Cognitive and behavioural perspectives in small ventures. European Journal of International Management, 19(3), 307-337.
Woodside, A. G. (2014). Embrace• perform• model: Complexity theory, contrarian case analysis, and multiple realities. Journal of Business Research, 67(12), 2495-2503.
Xie, X., & Wang, H. (2020). How can open innovation ecosystem modes push product innovation forward? An fsQCA analysis. Journal of Business Research, 108, 29-41.
Yang, B., Bai, W., Chen, Y., & Rong, K. (2025). Internationalization of digital firms: A systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 189, Article 115124.
Zhan, W., & Chen, R. (2013). Dynamic capability and IJV performance: The effect of exploitation and exploration capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30, 601-632.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Telma Mendes, Miguel González-Loureiro, Vitor Braga
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
• O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
• O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
• A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
• É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.
