Frugal geeks: how founder knowledge boosts performance through bricolage and innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-12-2023-0234Palabras clave:
Frugal innovation, Bricolage, Startup, Founder, Knowledge, PerformanceResumen
PurposeThis study explores the relationship between founder’s knowledge on information and communication technology (ICT) and startup performance through frugal innovation (FI) and entrepreneurial bricolage (EB) in the product/service development strategy by using the lens of the knowledge-based view (KBV).
Design/methodology/approachThis study adopted a qualitative, multiple-case and contrasting approach. Primary data were collected through semi-structured interviews with founders of four Brazilian startups, complemented by secondary data from official documents, social media and industry report. Data analysis was conducted with a theory-driven coding scheme supported by triangulation of data sources by using Atlas.ti software.
FindingsThe founder’s prior knowledge on ICT influenced the product development strategy through FI and EB, resulting in different performance outcomes.
Research limitations/implicationsPotential limitations include subjective biases from semi-structured interviews, such as reliance on the founders’ perceptions, which may not capture the performance of their start-ups and thus result in incomplete secondary data.
Practical implicationsThe contrasting cases allowed for a deeper understanding of the relationships among founders regarding their knowledge on ICT, EB, FI and performance in the technology startup context.
Originality/valueBy relating the concepts of FI with KBV based on the startup founder’s knowledge on ICT, this study found that EB plays an intermediary role between them and FI, which influenced the startup performance. Moreover, this study informs founders and investors about how the founders’ team composition, especially in technology startups, can boost startup performance in restricted environments.
Descargas
Referencias
Abbas, S. M., & Liu, Z. (2021). Orchestrating frugal eco-innovation: The plethora of challenges and diagnostics in lean startups of emerging economies. Innovation and Management Review, 19(4), 339–367. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-11-2020-0171.
Abbas, S. M., Liu, Z., Mahmood, A., & Mushtaq, A. (2024). Fueling the innovation spark: How employee oriented HR practices and career satisfaction fosters innovative work behavior? Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences, 48(2), 387–404. doi: https://doi.org/10.31341/jios.48.2.10.
Abbas, S. M., Liu, Z., & Khushnood, M. (2025). Predicting breakthrough innovation engagement via hybrid intelligence: A moderated mediation model of self-extinction and social intelligence. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 20(5), 2061–2087. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-07-2022-1140.
Abid, N., Dowling, M., Ceci, F., & Aftab, J. (2023). Does resource bricolage foster SMEs’ competitive advantage and financial performance? A resource-based perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(8), 5833–5853. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3451.
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366. doi: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329.
Bardin, L. (2013). L’analyse de contenu ( (2e éd.) ). Presses Universitaires France.
Berndt, A. C., Gomes, G., Borini, F. M., & Bernardes, R. C. (2023). Frugal innovation and operational performance: The role of organizational learning capability. RAUSP Management Journal, 58(3), 233–248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-12-2021-0249.
Berndt, A. C., Gomes, G., & Borini, F. M. (2024). Exploring the antecedents of frugal innovation and operational performance: The role of organizational learning capability and entrepreneurial orientation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(5), 1704–1722. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-06-2022-0320.
Bhatti, Y. A., & Ventresca, M. (2013). How can ‘frugal innovation’ be conceptualized? SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2203552.
Cai, Q., Ying, Y., Liu, Y., & Wu, W. (2019). Innovating with limited resources: The antecedents and consequences of frugal innovation. Sustainability, 11(20), 5789. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205789.
Chakravarty, S. (2022). Resource constrained innovation in a technology intensive sector: Frugal medical devices from manufacturing firms in South Africa. Technovation, 112, 102397. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102397.
Chatterjee, S., Chaudhuri, R., & Vrontis, D. (2021). Antecedents and consequence of frugal and responsible innovation in Asia: Through the lens of organization capabilities and culture. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 41(3), 979–1003. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09797-3.
Chowdhury, S., Budhwar, P., Dey, P. K., Joel-Edgar, S., & Abadie, A. (2022). AI-employee collaboration and business performance: Integrating knowledge-based view, socio-technical systems and organisational socialisation framework. Journal of Business Research, 144(February), 31–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.069.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x.
Cooper, S. C., Pereira, V., Vrontis, D., & Liu, Y. (2023). Extending the resource and knowledge based view: Insights from new contexts of analysis. Journal of Business Research, 156, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113523.
Dabić, M., Obradović, T., Vlačić, B., Sahasranamam, S., & Paul, J. (2022). Frugal innovations: A multidisciplinary review & agenda for future research. Journal of Business Research, 142(January), 914–929. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.032.
Davidsson, P., Baker, T., & Senyard, J. M. (2017). A measure of entrepreneurial bricolage behavior. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 23(1), 114–135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2015-0256.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Dost, M., Pahi, M. H., Magsi, H. B., & Umrani, W. A. (2019). Effects of sources of knowledge on frugal innovation: Moderating role of environmental turbulence. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(7), 1245–1259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2019-0035.
Dost, M., Nikbin, D., & Qureshi, A. A. (2022). Frugal innovation and firm performance. In Academy of Management Proceedings. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.10582.
D’Andrea, F. A. M. C., Santos, D. A. G. dos, Costa, C. V. P., & Zen, A. C. (2023). Why startups fail in emerging entrepreneurial ecosystems? REGEPE Entrepreneurship and Small Business Journal, 12, e2055. doi: https://doi.org/10.14211/regepe.esbj.e2055.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003.
Fisher, G. (2012). Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: A behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(5), 1019–1051. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00537.x.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363G.
Gbadegeshin, S. A., Natsheh, A. A., Ghafel, K., Mohammed, O., Koskela, A., Rimpiläinen, A., … Kuoppala, A. (2022). Overcoming the valley of death: A new model for high technology startups. Sustainable Futures, 4, 100077. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2022.100077.
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 109–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110.
Gurca, A., & Ravishankar, M. N. (2016). A bricolage perspective on technological innovation in emerging markets. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 63(1), 53–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2015.2494501.
Herstatt, C., & Tiwari, R. (2020). Opportunities of frugality in the post-corona era. International Journal of Technology Management, 83(1-3), 15–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2020.109276.
Hossain, M. (2016). Frugal innovation: A systematic literature review. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2768254.
Hossain, M. (2018). Frugal innovation: A review and research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 182, 926–936. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.091.
Hossain, M. (2022). Frugal entrepreneurship: Resource mobilization in resource- constrained environments. Creativity and Innovation Management, 31(May), 509–520. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12502.
Hossain, M., Agarwal, N., Bhatti, Y., & Levänen, J. (2022). Frugal innovation: Antecedents, mediators, and consequences. Creativity and Innovation Management, 31(3), 521–540. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12511.
Iqbal, Q., Ahmad, N. H., & Halim, H. A. (2021). Insights on entrepreneurial bricolage and frugal innovation for sustainable performance. Business Strategy and Development, 4(3), 237–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.147.
Iqbal, Q., Piwowar-Sulej, K., & Kallmuenzer, A. (2025). Sustainable development through frugal innovation: The role of leadership, entrepreneurial bricolage and knowledge diversity. Review of Managerial Science, 19(2), 573–594. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00764-y.
ITU (2020). Measuring digital development. Facts and figures 2020. In ITU Publications (pp. 1–15). International Telecommunication Union.
Kaplinsky, R., & Kraemer-Mbula, E. (2022). Innovation and uneven development: The challenge for low- and middle-income economies. Research Policy, 51(2), 104394. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104394.
Khanal, P. B., Aubert, B. A., Bernard, J. G., Narasimhamurthy, R., & Dé, R. (2021). Frugal innovation and digital effectuation for development: The case of Lucia. Information Technology for Development, 1–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1920874.
Kogut, B. (2000). The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 405–425. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3%3C405::AID-SMJ103%3E3.0.CO;2-5.
Latif, M., Iftikhar, Y., Ferasso, M., & Danish, R. Q. (2025). Exploring the nexus of collaborative culture, absorptive capacity, and ICT as catalysts for frugal innovations. Technology in Society, 82, 102927. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102927.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444.
Marvel, M. R., Davis, J. L., & Sproul, C. R. (2016). Human capital and entrepreneurship research: A critical review and future directions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 40(3), 599–626. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12136.
Marvel, M. R., Wolfe, M. T., & Kuratko, D. F. (2020). Escaping the knowledge corridor: How founder human capital and founder coachability impacts product innovation in new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(6), 106060. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106060.
Niroumand, M., Shahin, A., Naghsh, A., & Peikari, H. R. (2020). Frugal innovation enablers: A comprehensive framework. International Journal of Innovation Science, 12(1), 1–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-10-2019-0099.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (Vol. 4). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Pisoni, A., Michelini, L., & Martignoni, G. (2017). Frugal approach to innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 107–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.248.
Pozzebon, M. (2018). From aseptic distance to passionate engagement: Reflections about the place and value of participatory inquiry. RAUSP Management Journal, 53(2), 280–284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rauspm.2018.02.002.
Prahalad, C. K., Di Benedetto, A., & Nakata, C. (2012). Bottom of the pyramid as a source of breakthrough innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 6–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00874.x.
Reypens, L., Bacq, S., & Milanov, H. (2021). Beyond bricolage: Early-stage technology venture resource mobilization in resource-scarce contexts. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(4), 106110. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2021.106110.
Ridder, H.-G. (2017). The theory contribution of case study research designs. Business Research, 10(2), 281–305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-017-0045-z.
Rompho, N. (2018). Operational performance measures for startups. Measuring Business Excellence, 22(1), 31–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-06-2017-0028.
Rosca, E., Arnold, M., & Bendul, J. C. (2017). Business models for sustainable innovation – an empirical analysis of frugal products and services. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, S133–S145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.050.
Rossetto, D. E., Borini, F. M., Bernardes, R. C., & Frankwick, G. L. (2023). Measuring frugal innovation capabilities: An initial scale proposition. Technovation, 121(January), 102674. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102674.
Santisteban, J., & Mauricio, D. (2017). Systematic literature review of critical success factors of information technology startups. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 23(2), 1–23.
Santos, L. L., Borini, F. M., & Oliveira, M. D. M. Jr (2020). In search of the frugal innovation strategy. Review of International Business and Strategy, 30(2), 245–263. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-10-2019-0142.
Sarkar, S., & Mateus, S. (2022). Value creation using minimal resources – a meta-synthesis of frugal innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179(March), 121612. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121612.
Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077.
Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P. (2014). Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource-constrained new firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 211–230. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12091.
Shahzad, A., Rashid, H., & Abbas, S. M. (2023). The belt and road initiative: Catalyzing human capital development and technological innovation for sustainable growth. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 09(01-04), 361–380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740023500173.
Shen, T. (2018). When less is more: Exploring the antecedents of entrepreneurial bricolage and its innovation implication. School Newark Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.
Soto-Simeone, A., Sirén, C., & Antretter, T. (2020). New venture survival: A review and extension. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22(4), 378–407. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12229.
Steffens, P. R., Baker, T., Davidsson, P., & Senyard, J. M. (2023). When is less more? Boundary conditions of effective entrepreneurial bricolage. Journal of Management, 49(4), 1277–1311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221077210.
Sveiby, K. E. (2001). A knowledge-based theory of the firm to guide in strategy formulation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(4), 344–358. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930110409651.
Tan, F. T. C., Ky, D., & Tan, B. (2016). Toward a process theory of IT-enabled frugal innovation: The role of organizational bricolage in Koufu Singapore. In Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2016 - Proceedings.
Tiwari, R., & Herstatt, C. (2012). India–a lead market for frugal innovations? Extending the lead market theory to emerging economies. SSRN Electronic Journal, 49(67). doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1998411.
Weyrauch, T., & Herstatt, C. (2016). What is frugal innovation? Three defining criteria. Journal of Frugal Innovation, 2(1), 1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40669-016-0005-y.
Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24(13), 1307–1314. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.360.
Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. A. (2011). Where to from here? EO-as-experimentation, failure, and distribution of outcomes. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(5), 925–946. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00454.x.
Winterhalter, S., Zeschky, M. B., Neumann, L., & Gassmann, O. (2017). Business models for frugal innovation in emerging markets: The case of the medical device and laboratory equipment industry. Technovation, 66–67(April 2015), 3–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.07.002.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods, (6th ed.) , 53(5), Sage Publications. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108.
Yousaf, Z., Radulescu, M., Sinisi, C. I., Serbanescu, L., & Păunescu, L. M. (2021). Towards sustainable digital innovation of smes from the developing countries in the context of the digital economy and frugal environment. Sustainability, 13(10), 1–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105715.
Yu, X., & Wang, X. (2021). The effects of entrepreneurial bricolage and alternative resources on new venture capabilities: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 137(August), 527–537. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.063.
Zahra, S. A. (2021). The resource-based view, resourcefulness, and resource management in startup firms: A proposed research agenda. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1841–1860. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211018505.
Zhao, J., Huang, Y., Xi, X., & Wang, S. (2021). How knowledge heterogeneity influences business model design: Mediating effects of strategic learning and bricolage. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17(2), 889–919. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00643-4.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Rosana Vaz Barbosa Dangui, André Moraes dos Santos, Cláudio Reis Gonçalo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
• O(s) autor(es) autoriza(m) a publicação do artigo na revista;
• O(s) autor(es) garante(m) que a contribuição é original e inédita e que não está em processo de avaliação em outra(s) revista(s);
• A revista não se responsabiliza pelas opiniões, ideias e conceitos emitidos nos textos, por serem de inteira responsabilidade de seu(s) autor(es);
• É reservado aos editores o direito de proceder ajustes textuais e de adequação do artigos às normas da publicação.
