Self-organization of the basketball game: system fluctuations and their influences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-4690.2023e37181141Keywords:
Analysis, Basketball, Classification, SportsAbstract
Due to the dynamism of events during matches, basketball can be understood as a complex and dynamic system. The objective was to understand the self-organization of the basketball game. All men's basketball matches of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games were analyzed. The analysis protocol was based on game action variables and classification of the end of each offensive process. The results demonstrate that finishing on target is the main attractor of the game, with 2 points as the main success indicator. The most relevant fluctuations are ratings without completion and 3+ points. The classification helped to understand the basketball self-organization and presents a possibility to analyze the basketball game.
Downloads
References
Menezes RP, Marques RFR, Nunomura M. Especialização esportiva precoce e o ensino dos jogos coletivos de invasão. Movimento. 2014;20(1):351-73.
Galatti LR, Paes RR, Machado GV, Seoane AM. Campeonas del Mundo de Baloncesto: factores determinantes para el rendimiento de excelencia. Cuad Psicicol Deporte. 2015;15(3):187-92. Available from: http://revistas.um.es/cpd
Prochnow RA, Reale VMC, Santos YYS, Monezi LA, Mercadante LA. Análisis de indicadores técnicos que discriminan equipos ganadores y perdedores en el nuevo baloncesto Brasil. Rev Euroamericana Ciênc Deporte. 2017;6:207-12.
Gréhaigne JF, Bouthier D, David B. Dynamic-system analysis of opponent relationships in collective actions in soccer. J Sports Sci. 1997;15(2):137-49.
McGarry T, Anderson DI, Wallace SA, Hughes MD, Franks IM. Sport competition as a dynamical self-organizing system. J Sports Sci. 2002; 20: 771-81.
Passos P, Araújo D, Davids K. Self-organization processes in field-invasion team sports implications for leadership. Sports Med. 2013;43(1):1-7.
Reed D, Hughes M. An exploration of team sport as a dynamical system. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2006;6(2):114-25.
Morato MP, Gomes MSP, Almeida JJG. Os Processos auto-organizacionais do Goalball. Rev Bras Ciênc Esporte. 2012;34(3):741-60.
D’ottaviano IML, Bresciani Filho E. Auto-organização e criação. MultiCiência. 2004;3:1-23.
Menezes RP. Contribuições da concepção dos fenômenos complexos para o ensino dos esportes coletivos. Motriz. Rev Educ Física. 2012;18(1):34-41.
Barragán RMN. Análisis cuantitativo y cualitativo de los momentos críticos en baloncesto [dissertation]. Madrid: Universidad Politécnica de Madrid; 2015.
McGarry T, Anderson DI, Wallace SA, Hughes MD, Franks IM. Sport competition as a dynamical self-organizing system. J Sports Sci. 2002;20(10):771-81.
Hughes M, Franks IM. The essentials of performance analysis: an introduction. New York: Routledge; 2008.
Doğan İ, Işik Ö, Ersöz Y. Examining the turkish men’s professional basketball team’s success according to game-related statistics with discriminant analysis. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2016;16(3):829-36.
Gómez MA, Lorenzo A, Barakat R. Differences in game-related statistics of basketball performance by game location for men’s winning and losing teams. Percept Mot Skills. 2008;1:43-50.
Ibáñez S, Sampaio J, Feu S, Lorenzo A, Gomez M, Ortega E. Basketball game-related statistics that discriminate between teams’ season-long success. Eur J Sport Sci. 2008;8(6):369-72.
Sporiš G, Šango J, Vučetić V, Mašina T. The latent structure of standard game efficiency indicators in basketball.Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2006 jun;6(1):120-9.
Puente C, Coso J, Salinero JJ, Abián-Vicén J. Basketball performance indicators during the ACB regular season from 2003 to 2013. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2015;15(3):935-48.
García J, Ibáñez SJ, Gómez MA, Sampaio J. Basketball Game-related statistics discriminating ACB league teams according to game location, game outcome and final score differences. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2014;14(2):443-52.
Conte D, Tessitore A, Gjullin A, Mackinnon D, Lupo C, Favero T. Investigating the game-related statistics and tactical profile in NCAA division I men’s basketball games. Biol Sport. 2018;35(2):137-43.
Csataljay G, O’Donoghue P, Hughes M, Dancs H. Performance indicators that distinguish winning and losing teams in basketball. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2009;9(1):60-6.
Zhang S, Lorenzo A, Zhou C, Cui Y, Gonçalves B, Angel Gómez M. Performance profiles and opposition interaction during game-play in elite basketball: evidences from National Basketball Association. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2019;19(1):28-48.
Csataljay G, James N, Hughes M, Dancs H. Effects of defensive pressure on basketball shooting performance. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2013;13(3):594-601.
Anguera MT, Mendo AH. La metodología observacional en el ámbito del deporte. Observational methodology in sport sciences. Rev Cienc Deporte. 2013;9(3):135-60. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=s3h&AN=97804990&lang=pt-br&site=ehost-live
Marcelino R, Sampaio J, Mesquita I. Investigação centrada na análise do jogo: da modelação estática à modelação dinâmica. Rev Port Cienc Desporte. 2011;11(1):481-99.
Hughes MD, Bartlett RM. The use of performance indicators in performance analysis. J Sports Sci. 2002;20(10):739-54.
Kubatko J, Oliver D, Pelton K, Rosenbaum DT. A Starting point for analyzing Basketball statistics. J Quant Anal Sports. 2007 jul 25;3(3).
Anguera MT. Observación en deporte y conduta cinésico-motriz: aplicationes. Barcelona: Edicions Universitat; 1999.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical. International Biometric Society Stable.1977;33(1):159-74.
Fleiss JL, Levin B, Paik MC. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Jonh Wiley & Sons; 2013.
O’Donoghue P. Research methods for sports performance analysis. Research Methods for Sports Performance Analysis. 2010; 1-278.
Thomas JR, Nelson R, Silverman JK. Métodos de pesquisa em atividade física. 6a ed. Petersen RS, organizador. Porto Alegre: Artmed Editora; 2012.
Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37(5):360-3. Available from: http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/~julia/courses/CS6998/Interrater_agreement.Kappa_statistic.pdf
Capra F. A teia da vida: uma nova compreensão científica dos sistemas vivos. Cultrix. 1996; 249.
Ibáñez SJ, González-Espinosa S, Feu S, García-Rubio J. Basketball without borders? Similarities and differences among Continental Basketball Championships. Rev Int Cienc Deporte. 2018;14(51):42-54.
Trninié S, Dizdar D, Luksic E. Differences between winning and defeated top quality Basketball teams in final tournaments of European Club Championship. Coll Antropol. 2002;26:521-31.
Sampaio J, Janeira M. Statistical analyses of basketball team performance: understanding teams’ wins and losses according to a different index of ball possessions. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2003;3(1):40-9.
Çene E. What is the difference between a winning and a losing team: insights from Euroleague basketball. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2018;18(1):55-68.
Giovanini B, Conte D, Ferreira-Junior A, Nascimento VB. Assessing the key game-related statistics in Brazilian professional basketball according to season phase and final score difference. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2021;21(2):295-305.
Gómez MÁ, Medina R, Leicht AS, Zhang S, Vaquera A. The performance evolution of match play styles in the Spanish professional basketball league. Appl Sci. 2020;10(20):1-9.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Brazilian journal of physical education and sport
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Todo o conteúdo da revista, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons (CC-BY)
