Comparative analysis of performance trajectories by age, sex, and bodyweight class in Brazilian and International Para Powerlifting

Authors

  • Guilliber Carlos da Fonseca SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Neurorehabilitation Program for Spinal Cord Injury, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
  • Jefferson Rodrigues Dorneles SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Neurorehabilitation Program for Spinal Cord Injury, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
  • João Henrique Carneiro Leão Veloso SARAH Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Neurological Rehabilitation Program, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
  • Sonny Állan Silva Bezerra SARAH Rehabilitation Hospital Network, Orthopedic Rehabilitation Program, Macapá, AP, Brazil.
  • Frederico Ribeiro Neto SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Paralympic Sports Department, Brasília, DF, Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-4690.2026e40249541

Keywords:

Desempenho atlético, Exercício, Educação física e treinamento, Treinamento de força, Esportes para pessoas com deficiência, Paradesporto, Paratletas

Abstract

Objetivo: Analisar as trajetórias de desempenho de acordo com idade, sexo e categoria de massa corporal entre atletas brasileiros de Parahalterofilismo (PP) e comparar esses padrões com os observados em seus pares internacionais. Delineamento: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo. Resultados: Foram analisados dados de desempenho dos Campeonatos Nacionais Brasileiros (2017-2025), incluindo peso levantado, idade, sexo e categoria de massa corporal; as análises de idade e de idade no pico de desempenho incorporaram adicionalmente dados de Meetings regionais. Ao longo do período do estudo, diversas categorias de massa corporal apresentaram correlações positivas entre o peso levantado e o ano da competição, indicando uma tendência geral de melhora no desempenho, particularmente entre as atletas femininas (r=0,46; p<0,001). Nos atletas masculinos, a correlação geral foi mais fraca (r=0,26; p<0,001), com melhorias significativas observadas principalmente nas categorias até 49,0 kg, até 80,0 kg e acima de 107,0 kg. O perfil etário dos competidores permaneceu relativamente estável ao longo dos anos de competição, com exceções isoladas em categorias de massa corporal específicas. Modelos lineares de efeitos mistos indicaram que o pico de desempenho geralmente ocorreu entre o final da segunda década e a quinta década de vida, com a maioria das categorias de massa corporal masculina atingindo o pico entre 27 e 42 anos, enquanto as atletas femininas apresentaram maior variabilidade, alcançando até 52,5 anos em uma categoria. O tempo necessário para atingir o pico de desempenho após a primeira participação em uma final variou de aproximadamente 3 a 6 anos nos atletas masculinos e de 4 a 7 anos nas atletas femininas. Conclusão: Atletas brasileiros de Parahalterofilismo demonstram melhorias gerais no peso levantado ao longo dos ciclos de competição recentes, com uma estrutura etária estável e pico de desempenho ocorrendo tipicamente na idade adulta madura. Esses padrões são amplamente consistentes com os relatados para atletas internacionais e fornecem valores de referência que podem apoiar o desenvolvimento de atletas, o monitoramento do desempenho e o planejamento a longo prazo no PP.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. International Paralympic Committee (IPC). World Para Powerlifting rules and regulations 2025 [Internet]. Bonn: International Paralympic Committee; 2025. Available from: https://www.paralympic.org/sites/default/files/2025-05/WPPO%20Rules%20and%20Regulations%202025_v1_FINAL_4.pdf.

2. Severin AC, Baumgart JK, Haugen T, Hogarth L. Peak age and performance trajectories in Para powerlifters. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023. Epub 2022 May 25. doi:10.1097/PHM.0000000000002051.

3. Comitê Paralímpico Brasileiro. Manual de halterofilismo. Diretoria Técnica. São Paulo: Comitê Paralímpico Brasileiro; 2015.

4. Croix MDS. Advances in paediatric strength assessment: changing our perspective on strength development. J Sports Sci Med. 2007;6(3):292-304.

5. Baker D. Comparison of upper-body strength and power between professional and college-aged rugby league players. J Strength Cond Res. 2001;15(1):30-5.

6. Huebner M, Perperoglou A. Performance development from youth to senior and age of peak performance in Olympic weightlifting. Front Physiol. 2019. Epub 2019 Aug 27. doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.01121.

7. Solberg PA, Hopkins WG, Paulsen G, Haugen TA. Peak age and performance progression in world-class weightlifting and powerlifting athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2019;14(10):1357-63.

8. Allen SV, Hopkins WG. Age of peak competitive performance of elite athletes: a systematic review. Sports Med. 2015;45(10):1431-41.

9. Longo AF, Siffredi CR, Lentini NA, et al. Age of peak performance in Olympic Sports. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2016;48:849.

10. Haugen TA, Solberg PA, Foster C, Morán-Navarro R, Breitschädel F, Hopkins WG. Peak age and performance progression in world-class track-and-field athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13(9):1122-29.

11. Severin AC, Kinderen A, Baumgart JK. Effect of the athletes’ origin and type of impairment on participation and the likelihood of winning a medal in the Paralympic Games. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2025. Epub 2024 Jul 3. doi:10.1097/PHM.0000000000002548.

12. Patatas JM, De Bosscher V, Legg D. Understanding parasport: an analysis of the differences between able-bodied and parasport from a sport policy perspective. Int J Sport Policy Politics. 2018;10(2):235-54.

13. van den Hoek D, Garrett J, Howells R, Latella C. Paralympians are stronger than you know: a comparison of para and nondisabled powerlifting bench press world records. J Strength Cond Res. 2023;37(2):452-56.

14. Hogarth L, Nicholson V, Payton C, Burkett B. Modelling the age-related trajectory of performance in para swimmers with physical, vision and intellectual impairment. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021;31(4):925-35.

15. Schipman J, Gallo P, Marc A, et al. Age-related changes in para and wheelchair racing athlete's performances. Front Physiol. 2019;10:256. doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00256.

16. Ribeiro Neto F, Vara MFF, Dorneles JR, Costa RRG. Performance trajectory related to age, classification and sex in elite kayak para canoe athletes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024;103(5):448-57. doi:10.1097/PHM.0000000000002308.

17. Costa RRG, Ribeiro Neto F, Ramos BL, Tanhoffer R, O'Shea B, Winckler C. Age-related trajectory and age at peak competitive performance in wheelchair rugby players at the Paralympic Games. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024;103(8):747-52.

18. Kons RL, Apollaro G, Henríquez M, et al. Age at peak competitive performance in judo: a comparison between Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2025;21(3): 1887-94. doi:10.1177/17479541251369304.

19. Dehghansai N, Spedale D, Wilson MJ, Baker J. Comparing developmental trajectories of elite able-bodied and wheelchair basketball players. Adapt Phys Act Q. 2020;37(3):338-48.

20. Ribeiro Neto F, Winckler C, Costa RRG. Origin of impairment and timing of impairment manifestation in Paralympic sport. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2024;103(8). doi:10.1097/PHM.0000000000002474.

21. Patatas JM, De Bosscher V, Derom I, Winckler C. Stakeholders' perceptions of athletic career pathways in Paralympic sport: from participation to excellence. Sport Soc. 2022;25(2):299-320.

22. Patatas JM, De Rycke J, De Bosscher V, Kons RL. It's a long way to the top: determinants of developmental pathways in Paralympic sport. Adapt Phys Act Q. 2021;38(4):605-25.

23. International Paralympic Committee (IPC). Paralympic Games: summer overview [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2023 Aug 30]. Available from: https://www.paralympic.org/paralympic-games/summer-overview.

24. Pilon F, Prince F. Does producing scientific articles lead to Paralympic podiums? Biomechanics. 2024;4(1):123-43.

25. International Paralympic Committee (IPC). IPC Historical Results Archive [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ipc-services.org/hira/countries/profile/code/BRA

26. Morgan DP. The essential guide to SAS dates and times. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.; 2014.

27. Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6(4):284-90.

28. Griffin JE, Hinoveanu LC, Hopker JG. Bayesian modelling of elite sporting performance with large databases. J Quant Anal Sports. 2022;18:253-68.

29. Berthelot G, Sedeaud A, Marck A, et al. Has athletic performance reached its peak? Sports Med. 2015;45(9):1263-71.

30. Dehghansai N, Baker J. Searching for Paralympians: characteristics of participants attending "search" events. Adapt Phys Act Q. 2020;37(1):129-38.

31. Batterham AM, Hopkins WG. Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2006;1(1):50-7.

32. Bernards JR, Sato K, Haff GG, Bazyler CD. Current research and statistical practices in sport science and a need for change. Sports. 2017;5(4):87.

Published

2026-11-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Fonseca, G. C. da, Dorneles, J. R., Veloso, J. H. C. L., Bezerra, S. Állan S., & Ribeiro Neto, F. (2026). Comparative analysis of performance trajectories by age, sex, and bodyweight class in Brazilian and International Para Powerlifting. Brazilian Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 40, e40249541. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-4690.2026e40249541