Uniformity and comparability: an analysis of the relevance for the Brazilian capital market
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x202112890Keywords:
uniformity, comparability, relevanceAbstract
This research aimed to analyze the relationship between the characteristics of uniformity and comparability and the fundamental qualitative characteristic of relevance of financial reports for the Brazilian capital market, discussing the possibility of a tradeoff between comparability and relevance, the importance of considering both comparability and relevance to maximize the utility of financial statements, and the gaps regarding the “effectiveness” of uniformity and achieving comparability to the detriment of relevance. It is important to investigate the “effectiveness” of uniformity in terms of the utility of the decision due to the confusion that exists between the concepts of uniformity and comparability. The results will encourage regulatory bodies to reflect on the confusion that exists between uniformity and comparability and on fulfilling the characteristics of relevance and comparability, indicating what the relationship is between these from the viewpoint of the capital market. Uniformity is identified by means of the earnings covariance measure and comparability via the accounting function similarity measure. The relevance models are assessed using panel data regressions covering the period from 2013 to 2018. The sample includes companies from the B3 S.A. – Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão belonging to sectors classified in the Level 2 North American Classification System (NAICS) that comprise at least two companies. The results indicated that uniformity is not relevant for the Brazilian capital market, even when it contributes to comparability. These can be explained by the possible production of superficial comparability. They also revealed that comparability is relevant and positively related to the share price. However, the inclusion of this variable led to a decrease in explanatory power, which may indicate the achievement of comparability to the detriment of relevance. Finally, it is revealed that the Brazilian capital market distinguishes between the concepts of uniformity and comparability when evaluating companies.
Downloads
References
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (1973). Objectives of financial statements. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 159-178.
Barth, M. E. (1994). Fair value accounting: Evidence from investment securities and the market valuation of banks. The Accounting Review, 69(1), 1-25.
Barth, M. E. (2013). Global comparability in financial reporting: What, why, how, and when? China Journal of Accounting Studies, 1(1), 2-12.
Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H., & Landsman, W. R. (2001). The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: Another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 77-104.
Beaver, W. H. (1968). The information content of annual earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 67-92.
Beaver, W. H. (2002). Perspectives on recent capital market research. The Accounting Review, 77(2), 453-474.
Brunozi, A. C., Jr., Ott, E., Coelho, D. M., Menegat, L. A., & Webber, F. L. (2017). Persistência e value relevance dos resultados contábeis com a adoção das IFRS: um estudo em empresas de países do GLENIF. Enfoque: Reflexão Contábil, 36(3), 33-51.
Caylor, M., Chambers, D., & Mutlu, S. (2018). Financial reporting uniformity: Its relation to comparability and its impact on financial statement users. https://papers.ssrn.comsol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3221183 Chartered Financial Analyst. (2007). A comprehensive business reporting model: Financial reporting for investors. CFA Institute Centre for Financial Market Integrity.
Choi, J. H., Choi, S., Myers, L. A., & Ziebart, D. (2019). Financial statement comparability and the informativeness of stock prices about future earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(1), 389-417.
Cole, V., Branson, J., & Breesch, D. (2012). The uniformity-flexibility dilemma when comparing financial statements: Views of auditors, analysts and other users. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 20(2), 114-141.
Collins, D. W., Maydew, E. L., & Weiss, I. S. (1997). Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1), 39-67.
DeFranco, G., Kothari, S. P., & Verdi, R. S. (2011). The benefits of financial statement comparability. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(4), 895-931.
Fávero, L. P., Belfiore, P., Takamatsu, R. T., & Suzart, J. (2014). Métodos quantitativos com Stata: procedimentos, rotinas e análise de resultados. Elsevier.
Fields, T. D., Lys, T. Z., & Vincent, L. (2001). Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 255-307.
Gordon, I., & Gallery, N. (2012). Assessing financial reporting comparability across institutional settings: The case of pension accounting. The British Accounting Review, 44(1), 11-20.
Graner, F. (2020). Recuperação é a mais lenta da história, destaca estudo. https://valor.globo.com/brasil/noticia/2020/02/20/recuperacao-e-a-mais-lenta-da-historia-destaca-estudo.ghtml
Gross, C., & Perotti, P. (2017). Output-based measurement of accounting comparability: A survey of empirical proxies. Journal of Accounting Literature, 39, 1-22.
Hadi, A. S. (1992). Identifying multiple outliers in multivariate data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 54(3), 761-771.
Hendriksen, E. S. (1967). Toward greater comparability through uniformity of accounting principles. New York Certified Public Accountant, 37(2), 105-115.
Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 1-31.
Holthausen, R. W., & Watts, R. L. (2001). The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 3-75.
International Accounting Standards Board. (2018a). Conceptual framework for financial reporting.
International Accounting Standards Board. (2018b). Basis for conclusions on the conceptual framework for financial reporting.
Kim, R., Kim, S., & Musa, P. M. (2018). When does comparability better enhance relevance? Policy implications from empirical evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 37(5), 436-
Kothari, S. P. (2001). Capital markets research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and economics, 31(1-3), 105-231.
Lang, M. H., Maffett, M. G., & Owens, E. (2010). Earnings comovement and accounting comparability: The effects of mandatory IFRS adoption [Working Paper]. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1676937
Macedo, M. A., Machado, M. A. V., & Machado, M. R. (2013). Análise da relevância da informação contábil no Brasil num contexto de convergência às normas internacionais de contabilidade. Revista Universo Contábil, 9(1), 65-85.
May, G. (1938). Uniformity in accounting. Harvard Business Review, XVII(1), 1-8.
Ohlson, J. A. (1995). Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661-687.
Reina, D. R. M., Carvalho, L. N. G., Reina, D., & Lemes, S. (2019). Comparabilidade dos relatórios financeiros e informatividade dos preços das ações no Brasil. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 16(39), 177-198.
Ribeiro, A. M., Carmo, C. H. S., Fávero, L. P. L., & Carvalho, L. N. (2016a). Poder discricionário do gestor e comparabilidade dos relatórios financeiros: uma análise do processo de transição regulatória da contabilidade brasileira. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 27(70), 12-28.
Ribeiro, A. M., Carmo, C. H. S., Fávero, L. P. L., & Carvalho, L. N. G. (2016b). Comparabilidade x uniformidade dos relatórios financeiros: uma análise empírica durante o período de transição regulatória da contabilidade brasileira ao padrão internacional. Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting, 9(3), 262-282.
Santos, S. M., Lemes, S., & Barboza, F. L. M. (2019). O value relevance é relevante? Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 13, Artigo e152518.
Schipper, K. (2003). Principles-based accounting standards. Accounting Horizons, 17(1), 61-72.
Schipper, K., & Vincent, L. (2003). Earnings quality. Accounting Horizons, 17, 97-110.
Scott, W. R. (2015). Financial accounting theory (7a. ed.). Pearson Canada Inc.
Simmons, J. K. (1967). A concept of comparability in financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 42(4), 680-692.
Trueblood, R. M. (1966). Accounting principles: The board and its problems. Journal of Accounting Research, 4, 183-191.
Yip, R. W. Y., & Young, D. (2012). Does mandatory IFRS adoption improve information comparability? The Accounting Review, 87(5), 1767-1789.
Zeff, S. A. (2007). Some obstacles to global financial reporting comparability and convergence at a high level of quality. The British Accounting Review, 39(4), 290-302.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Contabilidade & Finanças
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The content of the article(s) published in the RC&F are of the entire liability of the authors, including with regard to the truth, updating and accuracy of data and information. The authors shall assign the rights in advance to the Department of Accounts and Actuarial Sciences of the FEA/USP, which shall permit the publication of extracts or of the whole, with prior permission, provided that the source is cited (Creative Commons – CCBY).
RC&F shall not charge a fee for the submission of articles. The submission of articles to RC&F shall imply that the author(s) authorizes/authorize its publication without the payment of author’s rights.
The submission of articles shall authorize the RC&F to adjust the text of the article(s) to their publication formats and if necessary, to make spelling, grammar and regulatory changes.
