Sistemas de informação gerencial habilitantes e qualidade do desempenho de servidores públicos

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/

Palavras-chave:

teoria da troca social, sistemas de informação gerencial habilitantes, qualidade do desempenho, comprometimento com a função

Resumo

Este artigo examina a influência de sistemas de informação gerencial (SIG) habilitantes na qualidade do desempenho de servidores públicos, mediada pelo comprometimento com a função. O estudo evidencia, à luz da teoria da troca social, que o uso de SIG habilitantes influencia positivamente a qualidade do desempenho de servidores públicos e que o comprometimento com a função medeia esta relação. A análise multigrupos revela que servidores com vínculo efetivo ou comissionado e com menor ou maior tempo de atuação apresentam efeitos distintos nessa relação. Os resultados apresentam implicações teóricas e práticas, ao apresentar evidências de que aspectos comportamentais, como o comprometimento com a função, ajudam a explicar o efeito de SIG habilitantes na qualidade do desempenho, e que aspectos pessoais, como o tipo de vínculo e o tempo de atuação, impactam de maneiras distintas a qualidade do desempenho de servidores públicos. Esses achados são relevantes para as políticas da instituição e para a qualidade da prestação de serviços aos cidadãos. A pesquisa traz novas evidências, tendo como lócus o setor público, sobre o papel dos SIG habilitantes na qualidade do desempenho dos servidores, com a interveniência do comprometimento com a função. Uma survey foi realizada com 252 servidores de uma instituição de defesa da ordem jurídica do Estado e para a análise dos dados se utilizou a modelagem de equações estruturais por mínimos quadrados parciais (PLS-SEM). 

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Referências

Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 61-89. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393986

Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2004). Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: A field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2), 271-301. https://doi.org/10.1506/VJR6-RP75-7GUX-XH0X

Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x

Andersen, L. B., & Serritzlew, S. (2012). Does public service motivation affect the behavior of professionals? International Journal of Public Administration, 35(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.635277

Baarspul, H. C., & Wilderom, C. P. (2011). Do employees behave differently in public-vs private-sector organizations? A state-of-the-art review. Public Management Review, 13(7), 967-1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2011.589614

Balfour, D. L., & Wechsler, B. (1990). Organizational commitment: A reconceptualization and empirical test of public-private differences. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 10(3), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X9001000303

Bedford, D. S., Speklé, R. F., & Widener, S. K. (2022). Budgeting and employee stress in times of crisis: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 101, 101346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2022.101346

Beuren, I. M., & Santos, V. D. (2019). Enabling and coercive management control systems and organizational resilience. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 30(81), 307-323. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201908210

Bido, D. S., & Silva, D. (2019). SmartPLS 3: Specification, estimation, evaluation and reporting. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 20(2), 488-536. https://doi.org/10.13058/raep.2019.v20n2.1545

Bisbe, J., Kruis, A. M., & Madini, P. (2019). Coercive, enabling, diagnostic, and interactive control: Untangling the threads of their connections. Journal of Accounting Literature, 43(1), 124-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2019.10.001

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.

Burney, L.L., Radtke, R.R., & Widener, S.K. (2017). The intersection of “bad apples” “bad barrels,” and the enabling use of performance measurement systems. Journal of Information Systems, 31(2), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51624

Camilleri, E. (2006). Towards developing an organisational commitment - public service motivation model for the maltese public service employees. Public Policy and Administration, 21(1), 63-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/095207670602100105

Camilleri, E., & Van Der Heijden, B. I. (2007). Organizational commitment, public service motivation, and performance within the public sector. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(2), 241-274. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576310205

Chao, M. C., Jou, R. C., Liao, C. C., & Kuo, C. W. (2015). Workplace stress, job satisfaction, job performance, and turnover intention of health care workers in rural Taiwan. Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health, 27(2), NP1827-NP1836. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539513506604

Chapman, C. S., & Kihn, L. A. (2009). Information system integration, enabling control and performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(2), 151-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.07.003

Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2-3), 127-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7

Cho, K. H., & Lee, S. H. (2001). Another look at public-private distinction and organizational commitment: A cultural explanation. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 9(1), 84-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028929

Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. (1988, 5 de outubro). https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm

Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2002). A daily diary study of affective responses to psychological contract breach and exceeded promises. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.139

Cook, K. S., Cheshire, C., Rice, E. R., & Nakagawa, S. (2013). Social exchange theory. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 61-88). Kluwer Academic.

Coyle-Shapiro, J., & Kessler, I. (2000). Consequences of the psychological contract for the employment relationship: A large scale survey. Journal of Management Studies, 37(7), 903-930. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00210

Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479-516. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099

Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874-900. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602

Emenda Constitucional n. 19, de 4 de junho de 1998. (1998). Modifica o regime e dispõe sobre princípios e normas da Administração Pública, servidores e agentes políticos, controle de despesas e finanças públicas e custeio de atividades a cargo do Distrito Federal, e dá outras providências. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/emendas/emc/emc19.htm

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

Felício, T., Samagaio, A., & Rodrigues, R. (2021). Adoption of management control systems and performance in public sector organizations. Journal of Business Research, 124, 593-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.069

Ferry, L., & Ahrens, T. (2017). Using management control to understand public sector corporate governance changes: Localism, public interest, and enabling control in an English local authority. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 13(4), 548-567. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-12-2016-0092

Gould-Williams, J., & Davies, F. (2005). Using social exchange theory to predict the effects of HRM practice on employee outcomes: An analysis of public sector workers. Public Management Review, 7(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1471903042000339392

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.

Heggen, C., & Sridharan, V. G. (2021). The effects of an enabling approach to eco-control on firms’ environmental performance: A research note. Management Accounting Research, 50, 100724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2020.100724

Hill, J., Kim, M., Oja, B. D., Kim, H. S., & Lee, H.-W. (2024). Innovation is the key: Identifying factors to increase career satisfaction and psychological well-being in millennial and generation Z sport employees. Sport, Business and Management, 14(3), 360-379. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBM-05-2023-0064

Hondeghem, A., & Perry, J. L. (2009). EGPA symposium on public service motivation and performance: Introduction. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852308099502

Jamal, M. (1984). Job stress and job performance controversy: An empirical assessment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90009-6

Johansson-Berg, T., & Wennblom, G. (2023). If managers feel safe, budget control becomes enabling. Evidence from a large local government organization in Sweden. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 35(6), 154-179. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-01-2023-0001

Jolly, P. M., Kong, D. T., & Kim, K. Y. (2021). Social support at work: An integrative review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(2), 229-251. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2485

Juana-Espinosa, S., & Rakowska, A. (2018). Public sector motivational practices and their effect on job satisfaction: Country differences. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 27(2), 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMBE-02-2018-0027

Kim, S. (2005). Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui013

Lei n. 8.112, de 11 de dezembro de 1990. (1990). Dispõe sobre o regime jurídico dos servidores públicos civis da União, das autarquias e das fundações públicas federais. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l8112cons.htm

Leung, V. T. Y., & Lin, P. M. C. (2022). The roles of multiple foci of employee commitments and job satisfaction on creative performance: A study of hotel chefs. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 101, 103107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.103107

Lin, C. P., Liu, C. M., & Chan, H. T. (2022). Developing job performance: Mediation of occupational commitment and achievement striving with competence enhancement as a moderator. Personnel Review, 51(2), 750-769. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2020-0296

Lizote, S. A., Verdinelli, M. A., & Nascimento, S. D. (2017). Organizational commitment and job satisfaction: A study with municipal civil servants. Revista de Administração Pública, 51, 947-967. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612156382

Ministério da Saúde / Conselho Nacional da Saúde (2016). Resolução n. 510, de 07 de abril de 2016. Dispõe sobre as normas aplicáveis a pesquisas em Ciências Humanas e Sociais [...]. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/cns/2016/res0510_07_04_2016.html

Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538

Meyer, J. P., & Morin, A. J. (2016). A person-centered approach to commitment research: Theory, research, and methodology. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(4), 584-612. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2085

Meyer, J. P., Morin, A. J., & Vandenberghe, C. (2015). Dual commitment to organization and supervisor: A person-centered approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.02.001

Oliveira, K. P., Paula, M. T. M. S., Paiva, L. R. O., Andrade, K. O. F., & Coura, E. R. (2021). A estabilidade no setor público brasileiro: O que pensam os servidores públicos? Revista de Carreiras e Pessoas, 11(2), 283-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.23925/recape.v11i2.44754

Oyadomari, J. C. T., Duque, B., Nisiyama, E. K., Dultra-de-Lima, R. G., & Mendonça, O. R., Neto (2018). Use of management reports and performance of sales managers in an insurance company. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 29(78), 343-354. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201805970

Paillé, P., Grima, F., & Dufour, M. E. (2015). Contribution to social exchange in public organizations: Examining how support, trust, satisfaction, commitment and work outcomes are related. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(4), 520-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.654809

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Qi, F., & Wang, W. (2018). Employee involvement, public service motivation, and perceived organizational performance: Testing a new model. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(4), 746-764. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316662531

Santos, V. & Beuren, I. M. (2023). How enabling and coercive control systems influence individuals’ behaviors? Analysis under the lens of construal level theory. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 19(5), 667-688. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-02-2022-0026

Steijn, B., & Leisink, P. (2006). Organizational commitment among Dutch public sector employees. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 72(2), 187-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852306064609

Sungu, L. J., Weng, Q., & Kitule, J. A. (2019). When organizational support yields both performance and satisfaction: The role of performance ability in the lens of social exchange theory. Personnel Review, 48(6), 1410-1428. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2018-0402

Swailes, S. (2004). Commitment to change: Profiles of commitment and in-role performance. Personnel Review, 33(2), 187-204. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480410518040

Taylor, J. (2007). The impact of public service motives on work outcomes in Australia: A comparative multi-dimensional analysis. Public Administration, 85(4), 931-959. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00686.x

Van Triest, S., Kloosterman, H., & Groen, B. A. (2023). Under which circumstances are enabling control and control extensiveness related to employee performance? Management Accounting Research, 59, 100831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2023.100831

Wang, W., & Yang, X. (2015). Does informal participation increase job satisfaction in public organizations? A study on civil servants in Beijing, China. Public Personnel Management, 44(3), 356-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026015586264

Wouters, M. & Wilderom, C. (2008). Developing performance-measurement systems as enabling formalization: A longitudinal field study of a logistics department. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 488-516. https://doi.org/1 10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.002

Yousaf, A., Sanders, K., & Yustantio, J. (2016). High commitment HRM and organizational and occupational turnover intentions: The role of organizational and occupational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(10), 1661-1682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1256905

Publicado

2025-05-26

Edição

Seção

Artigos Originais

Como Citar

da Silva Pereira, B., Beuren, I. M., & dos Santos, V. (2025). Sistemas de informação gerencial habilitantes e qualidade do desempenho de servidores públicos. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 36(97), e2152. https://doi.org/10.1590/