Sustainability disclosure and the relationship with board characteristics and assurance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x20242148.ptPalabras clave:
sustainability, disclosure, boards, assurance, stakeholdersResumen
This study aims to analyze the influence of internal factors within organizations, such as board characteristics and the practice of external assurance, on the quality of sustainability reports of Brazilian companies. As a gap, to examine the level of compliance of Brazilian companies’ sustainability reports with the methodology suggested by IR. The objective is to assess the effects of the external assurance variable on the compliance of sustainability information. The relevance of this study is to assess entities’ commitment to socio-environmental responsibility, transparency, and accountability to stakeholders, while fostering sustainable practices and enhancing corporate image nationally. This study provides a discussion on the current state of board compositions, highlighting the high number of directors and the low proportion of women, despite the significant positive influence women have on sustainability disclosure. The results related to the “External Assurance” variable may encourage more organizations to adopt this practice, with the expectation of demonstrating greater alignment with suggested methodologies. An adaptation of the method by Sun et al. (2022) was used, analyzing report quality across nine stakeholder-related topics. An unbalanced panel data analysis was conducted, using random effects estimated by GLS, on a sample of 357 reports from 49 Brazilian companies between 2014 and 2022. The variable “Presence of Women on Boards (PWOB)” was found to be significant in relation to the quality of sustainability disclosures, indicating that diversity contributes to greater prestige and attention to social issues. The variables “Board Committees (BC)” and “External Assurance (EA)” showed a positive relationship, supporting the board’s ability to respond to different pressures and reinforcing transparent and reliable approaches in communication with stakeholders.
Descargas
Referencias
Al-Nasrallah, W. (2023). The decade long story of gender equality and female empowerment: a case study of corporate disclosures in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(1), 216-241.
Arrington, C. E., & Puxty, A. G. (1991). Accounting, interests, and rationality: A communicative relation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2(1), 31-58.
Boiral, O., Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., & Brotherton, M. C. (2019). Assessing and improving the quality of sustainability reports: The auditors’ perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 155, 703-721.
Chouaibi, J., et al. (2022). Do board directors and good corporate governance improve integrated reporting quality? The moderating effect of CSR: An empirical analysis. EuroMed Journal of Business, 17(4), 593-618.
Cooray, T., Senaratne, S., Gunarathne, A. D. N., Herath, R., & Samudrage, D. (2020). Does integrated reporting enhance the value relevance of information? Evidence from Sri Lanka. Sustainability, 12(19), 8183.
Cucari, N., Esposito De Falco, S., & Orlando, B. (2018). Diversity of board of directors and environmental social governance: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(3), 250-266.
D’Apice, V., Ferri, G., & Intonti, M. (2021). Sustainable disclosure versus ESG intensity: Is there a cross effect between holding and SRI funds? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(5), 1496-1510.
Deegan, C., & Blomquist, C. (2006). Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(4-5), 343-372.
Deegan, Craig. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311.
Degenhart, L., da Silva Giordani, M., Piccinin, Y. G., dos Santos Grodt, J. A., & da Silva Zonatto, V. C. (2024). Diversidade de gênero, expertise do conselho de administração e a transparência da divulgação ambiental, social e de governança (esg): evidências do Brasil. Enfoque: Reflexão Contábil, 43(2), 40-56.
Di Vaio, A., Varriale, L., Di Gregorio, A., & Adomako, S. (2022). Corporate social performance and non‐financial reporting in the cruise industry: Paving the way towards UN Agenda 2030. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(6), 1931-1953.
Dwekat, A., Meqbel, R., Seguí‐Mas, E., & Tormo‐Carbó, G. (2022). The role of the audit committee in enhancing the credibility of CSR disclosure: Evidence from STOXX Europe 600 members. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(3), 718-740.
Farooq, Q., et al. (2020). Social and environmental development: Fresh concepts and soft measures towards sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 28(6), 1796-1803.
Freitas, M. R. O., Santos, S. M., & Crisóstomo, V. L. (2019). Nível de abrangência da informação ambiental divulgada nos relatórios de sustentabilidade de empresas brasileiras com potencial de impacto ao meio ambiente. Revista de Contabilidade e Controladoria, 10(3), 143,161.
García‐Sánchez, I. M., Martínez‐Ferrero, J., & Garcia‐Benau, M. A. (2019). Integrated reporting: The mediating role of the board of directors and investor protection on managerial discretion in munificent environments. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 29-45.
Haji, A. A., & Anifowose, M. (2016). Audit committee and integrated reporting practice: Does internal assurance matter? Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(8/9), 915-948.
Hamad, S., Lai, F. W., Shad, M. K., Konečná, Z., Goni, F. A., Chofreh, A. G., & Klemeš, J. J. (2022). Corporate governance code and voluntary disclosure of integrated reporting: Evidence from an emerging economy. Sustainable Development, 30(6), 1497-1510.
Helfaya, A., & Whittington, M. (2019). Does designing environmental sustainability disclosure quality measures make a difference? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 525-541.
Henriques, R., Gaio, C., & Costa, M. (2022). Sustainability Reporting Quality and Stakeholder Engagement Assessment: The Case of the Paper Sector at the Iberian Level. Sustainability, 14(21), 14404.
Holtz, L., & Sarlo Neto, A. (2014). Efeitos das características do conselho de administração sobre a qualidade da informação contábil no Brasil. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 25(66), 255-266.
Hummel, K., & Schlick, C. (2016). The relationship between sustainability performance and sustainability disclosure quality–hard numbers beat smooth talk. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(5), 455-476.
International Integrated Reporting Council. (2021). International Framework. Disponível em: https://relatointegradobrasil.com.br/home/framework/
Maria, S. C., d’Angelo, M. J., & Borgerth, V. M. D. C. (2021). Lacunas de engajamento e utilização do Relato Integrado no Brasil. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 33(88), 63-80.
Melloni, G., Caglio, A., & Perego, P. (2017). Saying more with less? Disclosure conciseness, completeness and balance in Integrated Reports. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(3), 220-238.
Miles, S., & Ringham, K. (2020). The boundary of sustainability reporting: evidence from the FTSE100. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(2), 357-390.
Mion, G., & Loza Adauí, C. R. (2019). Mandatory nonfinancial disclosure and its consequences on the sustainability reporting quality of Italian and German companies. Sustainability, 11(17), 4612.
Monteiro, A., Dos Santos, T. R., & Dos Santos, G. C. (2020). Índice de sustentabilidade empresarial (ISE) e desempenho econômico-financeiro nas empresas da b3. Ragc, 8(38).
Odriozola, M. D., & Baraibar‐Diez, E. (2017). Is corporate reputation associated with quality of CSR reporting? Evidence from Spain. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(2), 121-132.
Omran, I. I., et al. (2021). Sustainability assessment of wastewater treatment techniques in urban areas of Iraq using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). Water Practice & Technology, 16(2), 648-660.
Ong, T., & Djajadikerta, H. G. (2020). Corporate governance and sustainability reporting in the Australian resources industry: An empirical analysis. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(1), 1-14.
Pistoni, A., Songini, L., & Bavagnoli, F. (2018). Integrated reporting quality: An empirical analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 489-507.
Qaderi, S. A., et al. (2022). Board characteristics and integrated reporting strategy: Does sustainability committee matter? Sustainability, 14(10), 6092.
Ramdhony, D., Omran, M., & Hussainey, K. (2023). Board attributes and corporate social responsibility disclosure quality based on information typology. Review of Accounting and Finance, 22(4), 508-531.
Sun, Y., Xu, C., Li, H., & Cao, Y. (2022). What drives the innovation in corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures? An integrated reporting perspective from China. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(4), 100267.
Tiron-Tudor, A., et al. (2020). The level of European companies’ integrated reports alignment to the framework: The role of boards’ characteristics. Sustainability, 12(21), 8777.
Unerman, J. (2000). Methodological issues‐Reflections on quantification in corporate social reporting content analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(5), 667-681.
Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., Rubino, M., & Garzoni, A. (2020). The determinants of integrated reporting quality in financial institutions. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 20(3), 429-444.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
O conteúdo do(s) artigo(s) publicados na RC&F são de inteira responsabilidade do(s) autores, inclusive quanto a veracidade, atualização e precisão dos dados e informações. Os autores cedem, antecipadamente, os direitos autorais à Revista, que adota o sistema CC-BY de licença Creative Commons. Leia mais em: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/.
A RC&F não cobra taxa para a submissão de artigos. A submissão de artigo(s) à RC&F implica na autorização do(s) autor(es) para sua publicação, sem pagamento de direitos autorais.
A submissão de artigos autoriza a RC&F a adequar o texto do(s) artigo(s) a seus formatos de publicação e, se necessário, efetuar alterações ortográficas, gramaticais e normativas.
