The state as shareholder and tax authority: Effects of state ownership on corporate tax avoidance

Autores/as

  • Leandro da Costa Santos Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Departamento de Finanças e Contabilidade, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil
  • Héllen Karyne Duarte de Farias Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Departamento de Finanças e Contabilidade, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil
  • Robério Dantas de França Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Centro de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Departamento de Finanças e Contabilidade, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x20262513.en

Palabras clave:

state ownership, tax avoidance, property rights theory, agency theory, transaction cost economics

Resumen

This study aims to analyze the relationship between state ownership (SO) and the tax avoidance practices of firms listed on the Brazilian capital market. The research addresses two gaps in the literature. The first concerns the absence of metrics able to capture the State’s proportional influence within firms’ ownership structures, moving beyond the use of binary variables. The second relates to the scarcity of integrated theoretical approaches that explain the relationship between SO and tax avoidance practices. Ownership structure is central to corporate governance and is especially important in emerging economies such as Brazil, where the State acts as both a policymaker and a major shareholder. This study contributes to the theoretical, methodological, and practical advancement of the tax avoidance literature by providing evidence that state ownership tends to mitigate aggressive tax practices, with implications for managers, investors, and policymakers. Drawing on firms listed on B3 S.A. – Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão over the period from 2010 to 2023, ordinary least squares and quantile regression models were estimated. The State’s presence in firms’ ownership structures is associated with less aggressive tax avoidance practices, promoting more conservative tax management aligned with the public interest. The study offers three main contributions: (i) a methodological innovation that models SO as a continuous component of the ownership structure; (ii) an improved measurement of tax behavior by proposing adjustments to the normalized differential effective tax rate, making it more suitable to the Brazilian context; and (iii) a novel integration of agency theory, transaction cost economics, and property rights theory into a unified framework that explains state influence on corporate tax behavior.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Referencias

Abramov, A., Radygin, A., & Chernova, M. (2017). State-owned enterprises in the Russian market: Ownership structure and their role in the economy. Russian Journal of Economics, 3(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2017.02.001

Adhikari, A., Derashid, C., & Zhang, H. (2006). Public policy, political connections, and effective tax rates: Longitudinal data from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(6), 574-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.07.001

Annuar, H. A., Salihu, I. A., & Obid, S. N. S. (2014). Corporate ownership, governance and tax avoidance: An interactive effects. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.063

Barzel, Y. (1997). Economic analysis of property rights (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Bizerra, H. K. A. I., Abrahim, Y. F., França, R. D., & Lucena, W. G. L. (2024). O fator moderador da reputação corporativa sobre a RSC na agressividade fiscal. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade, 18(3), 407-426. https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v18i3.3444

Bradshaw, M., Liao, G., & Ma, M. (2019). Agency costs and tax planning when the government is a major shareholder. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 67(2-3), 255-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2018.10.002

Clemens, M. A., Radelet, S., Bhavnani, R. R., & Bazzi, S. (2011). Counting chickens when they hatch: Timing and the effects of aid on growth. The Economic Journal, 122(561), 590-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02482.x

Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law & Economics, 3, 1-44.

Colombo, J. A., & Terra, P. R. S. (2022). Interest on equity versus dividends: The role of shareholder identity in corporate tax avoidance. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 24, 175-205. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v24i1.4155

Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis. (2012). Pronunciamento Técnico CPC 18 (R2) - Investimento em coligada, em controlada e em empreendimento controlado em conjunto. http://www.portaldecontabilidade.com.br/legislacao/CPC_18_(R2).pdf

Desai, M. A., Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. (2007). Theft and taxes. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(3), 591-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.05.005

Duhoon, A., & Singh, M. (2023). Corporate tax avoidance: A systematic literature review and future research directions. LBS Journal of Management & Research, 21(2), 197-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/LBSJMR-12-2022-008

Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2008). Long-run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 61-82. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.61

Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121

Fernández-Rodríguez, E., García-Fernández, R., & Martínez-Arias, A. (2019). Influence of ownership structure on the determinants of effective tax rates of Spanish companies. Sustainability, 11(5), 1441. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051441

França, R. D., & Monte, P. A. (2020). Efeitos da reputação corporativa na tax avoidance de empresas brasileiras de capital aberto. Revista Universo Contábil, 15(4), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2019430

Gupta, S., & Newberry, K. (1997). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-4254(96)00055-5

Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3), 127-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.002

Hilling, A., Lundtofte, F., Sandell, N., Sonnerfeldt, A., & Vilhelmsson, A. (2021). Tax avoidance and state ownership - The case of Sweden. Economics Letters, 208, 110063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110063

Huyghebaert, N., Kang, S., Wang, L., & Wu, W. (2024). Multiple large shareholders, identity, and corporate tax avoidance. Management and Organization Review, 20(2), 235-264. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2024.11

Kim, J., & Mahoney, J. T. (2005). Property rights theory, transaction costs theory, and agency theory: An organizational economics approach to strategic management. Managerial and Decision Economics, 26, 223-242. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1218

Lietz, G. M. (2015). Tax avoidance vs. tax aggressiveness: A unifying conceptual framework [Working Paper]. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2363828

Long, W., Wu, H., Li, L., Ying, S. X., & Li, S. (2024). Mixed-ownership structure, non-state-blockholder coalition, and tax avoidance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91, 102988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102988

Mafrolla, E. (2019). Tax avoidance in government-owned firms: Evidence from Italy. Public Money & Management, 39(3), 186-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2018.1516955

Mahenthiran, S., & Kasipillai, J. (2012). Influence of ownership structure and corporate governance on effective tax rates and tax planning: Malaysian evidence. Australian Tax Forum, 27(4), 941-969. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2384718

Martinez, A. L., & Bis, C. (2020). Foreign capital participation and tax aggressiveness in Brazilian companies. Management and Business Research Quarterly, 15, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.32038/mbrq.2020.15.04

Martinez, A., Rodrigues, J. C., Dias, J. M., Filho, & Nakao, S. H. (2023). Agressividade fiscal e financeirização corporativa no Brasil. Revista Contabilidade, Gestão e Governança, 26(3), 378-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.51341/cgg.v26i3.3130

Medeiros, J. T., Soares, R. A., De Luca, M. M., & Teodósio, I. R. M. (2021). Concentração acionária e tax avoidance: E quando o Estado é o maior acionista? Revista Universo Contábil, 17(2), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2021213

Okimura, R. T., Silveira, A. M., & Rocha, K. C. (2007). Estrutura de propriedade e desempenho corporativo no Brasil. RAC-Eletrônica, 1(1), 119-135. https://repositorio.usp.br/item/001597216

Ouyang, C., Xiong, H., & Huang, Z. (2020). Dual roles of government in corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 62, 101355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101355

Pedersen, T., & Thomsen, S. (2003). Ownership structure and value of the largest European firms: The importance of owner identity. Journal of Management and Governance, 7(1), 27-55. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022480016567

Santos, L. C., & Machado, M. R. (2024). A influência da propriedade estatal no desempenho das empresas no mercado de capitais brasileiro. Revista Universo Contábil, 19, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2023112

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x

Solikhah, B., Chen, C.-L., Weng, P.-Y., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2024). Related party transactions and tax avoidance: Does government ownership play a role? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 24(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2024-0003

Tang, T. Y. H. (2020). A review of tax avoidance in China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 13(4), 327-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2020.10.001

Uadiale, O. M., Fagbemi, T. O., & Ogunleye, J. O. (2010). An empirical study of the relationship between culture and personal income tax evasion in Nigeria. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 20, 116-126. https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/18670/1/FullText.pdf

Velte, P. (2024). Ownership structure and corporate tax avoidance: A structured literature review. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 25(3), 696-731. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-10-2022-0259

Wang, W., Wang, H., & Wu, J. (2021). Mixed ownership reform and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence of Chinese listed firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 69, 101648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101648

Wang, F., Xu, S., Sun, J., & Cullinan, C. P. (2020). Corporate tax avoidance: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of Economic Surveys, 34, 793-811. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12347

Xia, F., & Walker, G. (2015). How much does owner type matter for firm performance? Manufacturing firms in China 1998-2007. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 576-585. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2233

Ying, T., Wright, B., & Huang, W. (2017). Ownership structure and tax aggressiveness of Chinese listed companies. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 25(3), 313-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-07-2016-0070

Publicado

2026-10-26

Número

Sección

Artículos

Cómo citar

Santos, L. da C., Farias, H. K. D. de, & França, R. D. de. (2026). The state as shareholder and tax authority: Effects of state ownership on corporate tax avoidance. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 37(102), e2513. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x20262513.en