Misconceptions in YouTube videos teaching accounting concepts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x20262562.enPalabras clave:
misconceptions, accounting concepts, videos, YouTubeResumen
This article aims to identify the types of misconceptions in videos that teach accounting concepts on YouTube. While the literature acknowledges the existence of misconceptions in accounting education, studies investigating this phenomenon in non-formal learning environments are scarce. Students often use YouTube to supplement their accounting education, but the manner in which misconceptions manifest, are structured, and are reinforced in accounting videos on the platform remains poorly understood. This study examines a widely accessible environment that influences the learning process. This environment prioritizes relevance and interaction, and it may favor engaging content, even if it is conceptually inaccurate, by enhancing the pedagogical use of videos. However, this environment also perpetuates misconceptions, which could be reduced by improving the quality of digital content. A total of 108 videos related to seven accounting concepts were selected and viewed. Misconceptions were extracted and categorized from these videos through content analysis of the transcripts. The analysis revealed that 35.2% of the videos contained misconceptions, primarily arising from excessive simplification of concepts such as assets and liabilities, as well as the introduction of inappropriate value judgments. Additionally, characteristics such as short duration and fragmented content were identified as factors that exacerbate misconceptions. The results offer three contributions. First, on a theoretical level, this study advances the discussion of misconceptions in accounting education by situating it within the context of digital environments. This broadens a debate that has thus far focused on formal education. Methodologically, the study proposes a systematic protocol for selecting audiovisual content, thereby contributing to greater rigor in research that uses videos as a data source. Practically speaking, the study provides educators and content producers with guidelines for creating more conceptually rigorous audiovisual materials and encourages students to engage with videos more critically.
Descargas
Referencias
Acar Sesen, B., & Ince, E. (2010). Internet as a source of misconception: “Radiation and radioactivity”. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4), 94-100. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ908075
Ay, M. (2011). Conceptual frameworks of university students regarding accounting. African Journal of Business Management, 5(5), 1570-1577. https://academicjournals.org/journal/AJBM/article-stat/981D44818419
Ay, M., & Altin, U. (2019). Misconceptions in accounting education. Journal of Human Sciences, 16(4), 938-960. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v16i4.5710
Bayuni, T. C., Sopandi, W., & Sujana, A. (2018). Identification misconception of primary school teacher education students in changes of matters using a five-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013, 012086. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012086
Calderari, E. B., Vianna, F. R. P. M., & Meneghetti, F. K. (2022). Professores o tempo todo: um estudo sobre as condições materiais, físicas e psicológicas de docentes no ensino superior durante a pandemia do covid-19. REAd – Revista Eletrônica de Administração, 28(2), 487-524. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-2311.356.112251
Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161-199. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25473477
Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90017-5
Chuan, C. M., & Kaiyrbayeva, A. K. (2024). Factors influencing the decision to invest. Ìzdenìster, Na̋tiželer, 2(102), 566-572. https://doi.org/10.37884/2-2024/55
Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis (CPC). (2019). Pronunciamento Técnico CPC 00 (R2) - Estrutura Conceitual para Relatório Financeiro. http://static.cpc.aatb.com.br/Documentos/573_CPC00(R2).pdf
D’Aquila, J. M., Wang, D., & Mattia, A. (2019). Are instructor-generated YouTube videos effective in accounting classes? A study of student performance, engagement, motivation, and perception. Journal of Accounting Education, 47, 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2019.02.002
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. (2020). Orientações sobre ética em pesquisa em ambientes virtuais. https://propp.ufu.br/sites/propp.ufu.br/files/media/documento/fiocruz_orientaassaues_sobre_actica_em_pesquisa_em_ambientes_virtuais.pdf
Galvão, N. M. S. (2019). O YouTube como ferramenta de estudo para o exame de suficiência em contabilidade. Revista EDaPECI - Educação a Distância e Práticas Educativas Comunicacionais e Interculturais, 19(2). https://periodicos.ufs.br/edapeci/article/view/10738
Gil, A. C. (2022). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 7. ed. Atlas.
Goulart, A. (2002). O conceito de ativos na contabilidade: um fundamento a ser explorado. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 13(28), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-70772002000100004
Grossi, M. G. R., Lopes, A. M., Jesus, P. M., & Galvão, R. R. O. (2014). A utilização das tecnologias digitais de informação e comunicação nas redes sociais pelos universitários brasileiros. Revista Texto Digital, 10(1), 4-23. http://doi.org/10.5007/1807-9288.2014v10n1p4
Hsiao, J., & Casa Nova, S. P. C. (2016). Abordagem geracional dos fatores que influenciam a escolha de carreira em contabilidade. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 27(72), 393-407. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201602980
Hussein, E., Juneja, P., & Mitra, T. (2020). Measuring misinformation in video search platforms: An audit study on YouTube. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392854
Iudícibus, S. (2009). Teoria da contabilidade. (9.ed.). Atlas.
Kemp, S. (2025). Digital 2025: Global Overview Report. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-global-overview-report
Lima Filho, R. N., & Bruni, A. L. (2012). Percepção dos graduandos em ciências contábeis de salvador (BA) sobre os conceitos relevantes da teoria da contabilidade. Revista de Educação e Pesquisa em Contabilidade (REPeC), 6(2), 187-203. https://doi.org/10.17524/repec.v6i2.176
Liu, M., Cardenas, V., Zhu, Y., & Enguidanos, S. (2019). YouTube videos as a source of palliative care education: A review. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 22(12), 1568-1573. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2019.0047
Maia, L. B., Silva, J. P., Souza, M. B., Henscke, N., & Oliveira, V. C. (2021). Popular videos related to low back pain on YouTube™ do not reflect current clinical guidelines: A cross-sectional study. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 25(6), 803-810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2021.06.009
Martins, E., Miranda, G. J., & Diniz, J. (2024). Análise didática das demonstrações contábeis (4. ed.). GEN/Atlas.
Martins, G. A., & Pelissaro, J. (2005). Sobre conceitos, definições e constructos nas ciências contábeis. Revista de Administração e Contabilidade da UNISINOS, 2(2), 78-84. http://www.spell.org.br/documentos/ver/20473/sobre-conceitos--%20definicoes-e-constructos-nas-ciencias-contabeis/i/pt-br
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
O conteúdo do(s) artigo(s) publicados na RC&F são de inteira responsabilidade do(s) autores, inclusive quanto a veracidade, atualização e precisão dos dados e informações. Os autores cedem, antecipadamente, os direitos autorais à Revista, que adota o sistema CC-BY de licença Creative Commons. Leia mais em: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/.
A RC&F não cobra taxa para a submissão de artigos. A submissão de artigo(s) à RC&F implica na autorização do(s) autor(es) para sua publicação, sem pagamento de direitos autorais.
A submissão de artigos autoriza a RC&F a adequar o texto do(s) artigo(s) a seus formatos de publicação e, se necessário, efetuar alterações ortográficas, gramaticais e normativas.


