Editorial – Special Issue on Fraud and Corruption: What Do Accounting and Organizations Have to Say?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2019.164441Keywords:
Fraud, CorruptionAbstract
N/A
Downloads
References
ACFE (2014). Report To the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse - Global Fraud Study. Association of
Certified Fraud Examiners.
Bologna, J., & Ross, A. (2015). Corruption and entrepreneurship: Evidence from a random audit program.
Working Paper Series, (15). College of Business and Economics Working Paper Series.
Campos, F. de A. O., & Pereira, R. A. de C. (2016). Corrupção e ineficiência no Brasil: Uma análise de equilíbrio
geral. Estudos Econômicos, 46(2), 373–408. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0101-416146244rpf.
Den Nieuwenboer, N. A., & Kaptein, M. (2008). Spiraling down into corruption: A dynamic analysis of the social
identity processes that cause corruption in organizations to grow. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 133–146.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9617-8.
Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The Regulation of Entry. The Quarterly
Journal of Economics, 117(1), 437–452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753399436.
Ferraz, C., Finan, F., & Moreira, D. B. (2012). Corrupting learning: evidence from missing federal education funds in
Brazil. Journal of Public Economics, 96 (9/10), 712-726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.05.012.
Garcia, E. G. (2015). Auditing vs. Forensics: Eliminating Corruption in Organizations. Disponível em:<
Acesso em outubro/2018.
Gupta, S., Sharan, R., & Mello, L. (2000). Corruption and military spending. IMF Working Paper 00/23,
International Monetary Fund.
Jamal, K., Johnson, P. E., & Berryman, R. G. (1995). La detection des effets de mise en scene dans les etats financiers.
Recherche Comptable Contemporaine, 12 (1), 107-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.
tb00483.x.
Jeppesen, K. K. (2018). The role of auditing in the fight against corruption. British Accounting Review, 51(5). DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2018.06.001.
Keig, D. L., Brouthers, L. E., & Marshall, V. B. (2015) Formal and Informal Corruption Environments and
Multinational Enterprise Social Irresponsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 52,(1). DOI: https://doi.
org/10.1111/joms.12102.
Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and Institutional Work. In: The Sage Handbook of Organization
Studies, 215-254.
Laurinho, Í. S., Dias, L. N. da S., & Mattos, C. A. C. de. (2017). Corrupção e ineficiência em licitações de governos
locais e desenvolvimento humano: novas reflexões. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, (30), 57–70.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/rco.v11i30.134529.
Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (3), 681–712. DOI: https://doi.
org/10.2307/2946696.
MacLean, T. L. (2008). Framing and organizational misconduct: A symbolic interactionist study. Journal of
Business Ethics, 78(1–2), 3–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9324-x.
Neu, D., Everett, J., Rahaman A.S., & Martinez, D. (2013). Accounting and networks of corruption Accounting.
Organizations and Society, 38 (6), 505-524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.01.003.
Ozili, P. (2015). Forensic accounting and fraud: A review of literature and policy implications. International
Journal of Accounting and Economics Studies, 3 (1), 63–68. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2628554.
Power, M. (2000). The audit society—Second thoughts. International Journal of Auditing, 4(1), 111-119. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1111/1099-1123.00306.
Svensson, J. (2003). Who must pay bribes and how much? Evidence from a cross section of firms. The Quarterly
Journal of Economics, 118(1), 207-230. Disponível em: www.jstor.org/stable/25053902.
Transparency International. (2018). Disponível em: < https://www.transparency.org>. Acesso em setembro/2019.
Ugaz, J. (2015). Fighting corruption, demanding justice: impact report. Transparency International Report.
Vecchia, L.A.D., Mazzioni, S., Poli, O.L., Moura, G.D.(2018). Corrupção e Contabilidade: Análise Bibliométrica
da Produção Científica Internacional. Sociedade, Contabilidade e Gestão, 13(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.21446/
scg_ufrj.v13i3.20033.
Wells, J. T. (2014). Principles of Fraud Examination (4th ed.). New Jersey: Wiley.
Wu, X. (2005). Corporate Governance and Corruption: A Cross-Country Analysis. An International Journal of
Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 18 (2), 151–170.
Zyglidopoulos, S., Hirsch, P., Martin, P., & Phillips, N. (2017). Expanding Research on Corporate Corruption,
Management, and Organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 26(3), 247–253. doi: https://doi.
org/10.1177/1056492617706648.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The RCO adopts the Free Open Access policy, under the standard Creative Commons agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The agreement provides that:
- Submission of text authorizes its publication and implies commitment that the same material is not being submitted to another journal. The original is considered definitive.
- Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g. publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with necessary recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on their personal page) before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).
- The journal does not pay copyright to the authors of the published texts.
- The journal's copyright holder, except those already agreed in the Free Open Access Agreement (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), is the Accounting Department of the Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting of Ribeirão Preto of the University of São Paulo.
No submission or publication fees are charged.
Up to 4 authors per article are accepted. Exceptionally duly justified cases may be reviewed by the Executive Committee of the RCO. Exceptional cases are considered as: multi-institutional projects; manuscripts resulting from the collaboration of research groups; or involving large teams for evidence collection, construction of primary data, and comparative experiments.
It is recommended that the authorship be ordered by contribution of each of the individuals listed as authors, especially in the design and planning of the research project, in obtaining or analyzing and interpreting data, and writing. Authors must declare the actual contributions of each author, filling the letter to the editor, at the beginning of the submission, taking responsibility for the information given.
Authors are allowed to change throughout the evaluation process and prior to the publication of the manuscript. The Authors should indicate the composition and final order of authorship in the document signed by all those involved when accepted for publication. If the composition and authoring order is different than previously reported in the system, all previously listed authors should be in agreement.
In the case of identification of authorship without merit or contribution (ghost, guest or gift authorship), the RCO follows the procedure recommended by COPE.
